I see you are from Indiana...so am I...Welcome!!!
Right- rules are made to be followed and that is why I am sure no one in here that is bashing others decisions have ever broken the rules or let their children slide on some things...
And again I will say- no one here is BREAKING any rules. They are letting a child ride a ride that they are tall enough to ride based on the written height restriction.s
Good for you mom. She will also learn to that rules are made to be followed.
If my child were plenty tall and a CM told my child he couldn't ride when clearly he's tall enough, I would teach my him to be assertive and stick up for himself, not in a rude way, but just to prove what's right and true. They know just b/c someone is an adult, doesn't mean they are always right and know everything, we're all human. It's the same principle that I teach them to count their change when buying something. If the cashier was wrong, he should speak up, even if he got extra money back.
No way would would I sit there quietly like a putz unless the stick clearly showed he's not tall enough.
If my child were plenty tall and a CM told my child he couldn't ride when clearly he's tall enough, I would teach my him to be assertive and stick up for himself, not in a rude way, but just to prove what's right and true. They know just b/c someone is an adult, doesn't mean they are always right and know everything, we're all human. It's the same principle that I teach them to count their change when buying something. If the cashier was wrong, he should speak up, even if he got extra money back.
No way would would I sit there quietly like a putz unless the stick clearly showed he's not tall enough.
True, no one is breaking any rules that you know of.
I purposely made a very generic comment to a different poster based on her decision to not fudge rules when it comes to her OWN child. In a subsequent post I started off by saying my comments were not directed to the OP, directly, since I don't know her, but rather my comments were meant to be very general in nature.
On the flip side, you are defending someone you don't even know. For all you know, she knows fully well her child is only 39 inches and she's looking for a way around the rules. Probably not. But you don't know her motives any more than I know her motives.
Also, like another poster mentioned. doctors and nurses who measure do sometimes make a mistake.
Whatever the case, I find it odd that if this is height problem that big an issue at the park, it has not been corrected yet. I don't think Disney has a morning staff meeting and reminds all the CM to be sure to ruin the day of any little kids that are 40-41 inches tall.
Why would a CM tell your child he is not tall enough if he is "clearly" tall enough?![]()
I agree with a PP...I have a DD and she is 41" tall but if they tell us she is not tall enough to ride then so be it...I want her to be safe. It may not make her happy at the time but at least she will be safe...
I guess I'm a fudger then. I think anything less than 1/4" is no biggie. I just don't see how that tiny amount would suddenly make the ride not safe for one child, but safe for another who is 1/4" taller.Good for you. But I thought the issue here was whether a parent, meaning any parent, should look for extra thick shoes and/or jam extra socks inside their small child's shoes to sidestep the rules. Some of us would fudge it. Some would prefer to not take any extra measures and would abide by the park rules. If that makes me a putz than so be it. I've been called worse. Note the screen name.
I don't know if this has been mentioned yet, but make sure that you "coach" your child on his posture when being measured. My DD tended to slouch down a bit when standing underneath the measuring post. I think she was afraid to hit her head? I taught her to stand up nice and tall and make her neck look like a giraffe's and it worked. She was 40" at the time, according to us and her doctor, but I agree that Disney's measuring posts are a little off. But teaching her to stand up tall (not on her tiptoes, though), gave her that little "boost" she needed to ride the rides.
It also depends on the CM. Some CMs are very critical and will really get down to your child's level to see if the are hitting that post or not. Other CMs just kind of glance quickly and let them go.
I firmly believe that all the height restrictions are higher (by several inches) then they NEED to be. Disney is not going to get itself sued over something dumb. I'm also sure that the Imagineers factored in the height of moderately large shoes. Your child will be fine as long as they're not wearing stilts to make the height requirement.
The Disney measuring sticks are not 41 inches tall. Height is subjective. Like a man with two watches never knows the correct time.
Your doctor may say your child is 40 inches tall. Your kitchen wall may say he's 40 inches tall. But if you take him to my doctor, that one might not say he's 40 inches tall.
BOLOGNA!!! Measurement is regulated! You can make certain that your doctors instruments are identical to mine or hers. Time is a different story but there is an offical time!
I was responding to the PP who praised this comment:
I was just stating if my child were 41" when the requirement was 40" and a CM wouldn't allow him to ride, I would speak up. Not to make my child happy but a matter of speaking up for what's correct and true. Why suffer in silence if you know you're right?![]()