I-95 south from DC to at least Fredericksburg and often as far as Richmond is a parking lot Saturday and Sunday mornings in the summer. It's mainly traffic going to the Outer Banks and it's bumper to bumper. People around me leave (VA suburb west of DC) at 5-6am to try and get ahead of it, and are only partially successful. The worst of it is late June thru August, Late May through June is busy but not as bad.
I live in CT and my family and I were seriously considering driving down to Disney World before we found a good deal for airfare. We were going to take the "scenic route" and avoid Philly and DC via I-81 and I-77. Although it's a longer drive in terms of distance, we were told by friends who regularly drive south from CT that it's less stressful.
I live in CT and my family and I were seriously considering driving down to Disney World before we found a good deal for airfare. We were going to take the "scenic route" and avoid Philly and DC via I-81 and I-77. Although it's a longer drive in terms of distance, we were told by friends who regularly drive south from CT that it's less stressful.
I have heard of that route. I was told that route adds 1.5-2 hours more to the drive. Hope someone from DIS can share some insight regarding that route.
From the Tappanzee Bridge to WDW is @ 1128 miles, if you went down to 95 and took that to I-4 in FL. Going the 'inland route', it's 1226. That's the Tappanzee to 78-81-77-26-95-I4. Inland, there is 1 toll both at the NJ/PA line, I think it was $1.00 last time we drove there. Returning, the only toll is at the Tappanzee Bridge.
When I drive from NC to MA, I have went this 'inland' route for the last 12+ years. Too many big city traffic issues on 95, aside from the fact you have to stop at toll booths frequently. As best I can recall, the last time I took 95 from Richmond up to MA, we paid @ $26 in tolls.
The biggest downside I read about going 'inland' is the increase in large tractor trailer trucks. I prefer driving inland with a higher % of professional drivers on those roads, rather than the 95 route and the inexperienced drivers on that route. The lack of tolls is a plus, as is the lack of stopping to pay tolls.
Time wise, mileage says it 1.5 hours longer. In reality, it's quicker, if normal traffic applies on both routes, and definitely cheaper.
That's my info on the 'inland' route.
@monorailsilver
Haha... oh my... I'm sorry that drive was so miserable for you!
Our upcoming trip consists of all adults - my parents, my older sister, and me. I'm pretty sure I was the reason why we never considered driving down to Disney before. As a child, I would have been miserable driving through rural Virginia. I remember being miserable on trips to Vermont... "Mom, are we there yet?" "I'm bored!" "I think I'm carsick!", etc.
Thankfully, I've matured a lot, and as an adult, I was actually looking forward to the drive through the Appalachian mountains. Go figure!