It doesn't change the facts of consumer law.
It often doesn't accurately state them, either. I'll keep my Toyota, it's still better built than a Cobalt or a Focus.
It doesn't change the facts of consumer law.
Seems you missed the point of my post, which wasn't about what kind of car you or I like.It often doesn't accurately state them, either. I'll keep my Toyota, it's still better built than a Cobalt or a Focus.
If the spring on the gas pedal is faulty, why are the adding a metal piece to the pedal instead of replacing the faulty spring?
If the spring on the gas pedal is faulty, why are the adding a metal piece to the pedal instead of replacing the faulty spring?
http://www.whotv.com/news/who-story-toyota-recall-020310,0,7257181.story
...Service Manager Scott Westercamp says the problem lies with a small spring in the gas pedal assembly. He says, in some cases, the spring does not offer enough pressure to return the pedal to its original position.
"It will progressively catch. There's a good chance the customer will actually feel it not releasing and it's not necessarily going to rev up to a full throttle situation as much as it would be a not return to idle position," Westercamp says.
The fix is quick and simple. Westercamp says technicians remove the gas pedal and place a small metal plate near the faulty spring to increase the tension. The whole job takes about an hour and there is no charge...
I'll keep my Toyota, it's still better built than a Cobalt or a Focus.
I agree. The emotions on this thread, though, are a good reflection, from what I read, of emotions globally about this recall.I'm shocked at how people's opinions of this recall vary - it is a major recall - I don't remember a previous recall when vehicle sales were stopped.
Opinions are beginning to filter in on how badly this was handled. It might wind up being an example for years to come on how not to handle a crisis.Does Toyota make a great product? Yes, but they dropped the ball on this.
Toyota's no-show leadership
By Alex Taylor III, senior editorFebruary 4, 2010: 12:26 PM ET
NEW YORK (Fortune) -- The last time anyone looked, Toyota was a Japanese company controlled by a Japanese family. But during the entire accelerator recall crisis -- now complicated by brake problems with the Prius -- they have been all but invisible.
These are no absentee owners. The Toyoda family built Toyota Motor (TM) into the largest auto company in the world and the leader of its third generation, Akio Toyoda, is president. His father, Dr. Shoichiro Toyoda, who turns 85 on February 17th, is the company's honorary chairman and, according to associates, he remains deeply involved in the company's operations.
So with this rich history behind them, who did Toyota send out this week to answer questions about the accelerator recall? An American sales executive named Jim Lentz.
Now Lentz is one of the smartest and most capable executives in the auto industry, but he isn't even Toyota's number one executive in the U.S. Nor is he an engineer, which makes him less then perfectly qualified to answer technical questions about how an automobile starts and stops.
But what's really worse is that he is not a member of the Toyoda family. Akio Toyoda has strongly held views about the importance of quality and reliability in Toyota's history, and the role of his family in the company's success. But neither he nor his father has confronted the recall problem head on in public. The younger Toyoda has even gotten the nickname "no-show Akio."
It is frankly surprising and hard to explain. In a good year, North America provides the bulk of the profits for Toyota and is a major contributor behind Toyota's enormous market capitalization. But now, at a time of its biggest crisis, when the flow of those profits is threatened, Toyota has allowed America to fend for itself.
One senses a deep debate going on inside the company. On one side is the American operation arguing for Japan to get significantly involved in the recall in a way that the public can see. But America has always had a difficult time making its opinions heard on the other side of the Pacific. That difficulty has been exacerbated because of the retirement at year's end of a senior California-based public relations operative.
Back in Japan, executives are struggling to come up with an answer to public doubts about Toyota cars and trucks. But they are traditionally slow to act and their sense of how to communicate with American audiences is not well-developed.
Keep in mind that Toyota is a company run by engineers who like definitive answers to even the most complex problems. They are uncomfortable with softer subjects -- especially in different cultures -- that aren't easily understood through a root-cause analysis.
It is likely that Japan is all too mindful of the drubbing that Ford CEO Jac Nasser took a decade ago when he become the automaker's spokesman in the Explorer rollover crisis. Nasser became something of a laughingstock because of his thick Australian accent, and there were predictable references to Crocodile Dundee.
Most Toyota executives speak excellent English, though they often prefer to have interpreters translate for them. They are doubtless concerned about the impact of their accents on Toyota's image. Still, they would likely win points for sincerity and conviction were they to speak for themselves when appearing before the American public.
Prolonged media appearances in times of crisis by top executives may not be not the Japanese way. But it is the American way and, increasingly, the global way.
Toyota has struggled for years to shed its conservative habits and to become more of a global company. But the slow progress it had been making in this direction has been reversed by its handling of the current crisis.
There is a Japanese expression: genchi genbutso, meaning "go see for yourself." It is an integral part of the renowned Toyota Production System. For any problem to be solved, it has to be inspected first at the place where it has occurred.
It is time for the Toyoda family and their associates to go and be seen at a place where Toyota cars are designed and built so they can face the public, explain what has gone wrong and lay out how it plans to fix them. Such a simple act will go a long way toward defusing the current crisis -- and enabling Toyota to keep growing as a global company.
http://money.cnn.com/2010/02/04/autos/toyota.fortune/
There was a big outcry only after many people died. The outcry wasn't immediate, just like the Toyota outcry wasn't immediate. Ford and Firestone knew about the problem long before the media got ahold of it. That recall was issued in Aug 2000, ironically days after the Firestone CEO denied that there was any problem with their tires. The NHTSA came to Firestone in May of 2000 with concerns about the tires on the Explorer. Ford had brought the issue up to Firestone in 1995 and again in 1997. Ford began issuing free replacement tires on the same exact same Explorers in Venezuela 3 months before the US recall. No, Ford and Firestone knew nothing about it and issued the recall immediately with no delay.
Do you actually believe that? The US companies are some how more honorable than foreign companies? These are ALL money making businesses their entire purpose is to make money and everything the do is with that in mind. ALL businesses operate this way.
Point me to a news story about people dying with floor mats in the trunk. This is a separate different recall on a different issue than the floor mat recall anyway. Toyota has made is clear that these are 2 different things. And the only death we are hearing about is the Lexus in California. And yes I understand that Lexus is a Toyota division.
Me thinks someone works for Toyota.Every Dodge and Ford vehicle I have ever owned has had hard to use gas pedals. Hard to get started, slow to release. Every one. But, they are American. The big bad foreigners came in here and out-sold the Americans. Even cash for clunkers was better for Toyota than Dodge.
Next recall hype from Detroit: Toyota seat belts could lock up on you while you are trying to put them on. It must be a defect in the way the belt unrolls. Goverment officials will recommend you burn your Toyotas immediately.
Me thinks someone works for Toyota.![]()
I agree!I think the point that Toyota has made a lot of really reliable cars in the past is certainly true.
But they are botching this is a big, big way. When you have a public 911 tape chronicling the last moment's of a family's life because of YOUR product and your arrogance, you are in serious trouble.
I think the point that Toyota has made a lot of really reliable cars in the past is certainly true.
But they are botching this is a big, big way. When you have a public 911 tape chronicling the last moment's of a family's life because of YOUR product and your arrogance, you are in serious trouble.
As for more power, I'd like to compare somone's Fusion to my truck and compare power.
I don't work for Toyota, I just drive one. As for more power, I'd like to compare somone's Fusion to my truck and compare power. Ford and Dodge may have come a long way, that just means that they had a long, long way to come- just to get even.
As far as Toyota "botching" it, most of the hype on this issue is coming from the U.S. 3. They can easily blow it way out of proportion. And they have. They are good at gathering the emotions on this and running with it. They would have more respect if they competed with their product, not their PR machine.
I As for more power, I'd like to compare somone's Fusion to my truck and compare power.
Why would you compare a compact car with a truck? Compare like models and you will see that they DO compete with their product. As for your truck, Toyota doesn't have anything that can compete with the Duramax/Powerstroke/Cummins. You are blinded by your hatred for American cars that you can't admit anything good about them. In fact you are trying to blame the "Big 3 Hype Machine" for this issue with Toyota. The facts are:
-The blame lies completely on Toyota and it is their responsibility to fix it.
-American cars on the same level as foreign cars, different companies are better at different things which gives people the option to choose one based on their preference (comfort, performance, aesthetics, public opinion, etc)