FantasiaMagic
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2012
- Messages
- 2,522
Yes! That would be very nice and I agree w/ pp one that fits 5 adults! There are only 4 mods (5 counting FWL), but I would like to see another mod! 

Missytara said:You cannot design a resort with all the rooms for 5 adults at a standard design with two beds, one bathroom and one door. 5 adults in an entire resort cannot safely evacuate in one corridor without going to large suites.
As an architect, this cannot be done.
Also, to the OP, you can wish all you want, but it can no longer be a moderate if you accommodate larger parties. Then it becomes a deluxe, with larger spaces, more exits, and larger corridors to accommodate adults, not a combo of kids ans adults.
You. Can ask the question 60 days to Sunday, but it is still the same. Design of a hotel/resort falls to the mass market and any other party size does not make money for the stockholders. This is not a Motel 6.
Yes! That would be very nice and I agree w/ pp one that fits 5 adults! There are only 4 mods (5 counting FWL), but I would like to see another mod!![]()
The Holiday Inn we stayed at two weeks ago was almost entirely made up of rooms that slept six adults (two queens and a sleeper sofa, one door, one normal sized bathroom). Slightly larger than a regular room but not suites by any means. It surely can be done and I don't think anyone would consider a Holiday Inn to be up to deluxe standards. Disney could easily copy the floor plan of the hotel I stayed at, slap a theme on it and call it a mod that sleeps up to six adults in a non-suite room. How can you say it can't be done? It's done all the time everywhere but at Disney.
Whether or not it would be profitable to Disney as a mod is a different question. Disney would likely call it a deluxe and charge as much as possible even though it could easily be done at a mod level of amenities.
It surely can be done and I don't think anyone would consider a Holiday Inn to be up to deluxe standards. Disney could easily copy the floor plan of the hotel I stayed at, slap a theme on it and call it a mod that sleeps up to six adults in a non-suite room. How can you say it can't be done? It's done all the time everywhere but at Disney.
She said it couldn't happen from an architectural standpoint due to evacuation needs. And I said that doesn't make any sense because there are plenty of hotels with one bathroom and one door that open into an inside corridor and sleep six that obviously meet evacuation requirements. That is what I questioned. Not the cost. It won't happen as a mod because WDW is never going to reasonably price a room that sleeps more than four.
AoA is a supposed value category with lower end deluxe prices. I don't think people are annoyed at the prices so much as they are at Disney calling it a value hotel. We have two rooms at POR for cheaper than one room at AoA. Some "value". Based on that, If Disney ever created a mod that slept 5 or 6 adults with mod level amenities, I could see it being as pricey as a Poly theme park view.
The "value" for many are not having to get two rooms and having to worry about not getting connecting rooms. They can keep the whole family in one spot. They have a dining table etc. You are not getting that with two rooms at a value or mod.
ETA I think you should think aboout it in terms of flying say SW, you can get a cheaper flight but you dont get to choose your seat, for some this is no big deal and the price is just right. For others they do not like to "risk" not being able to pick their seat so they pay more for this service. You are paying to have the security of having your family all together.
Even though there are more deluxe resorts, there are more moderate rooms to be had.![]()
True, but I was referring to selection. For each individual family, people don't care about the number of rooms but which resort they want to try. You could stay at a different deluxe resort every trip for years but for the mods, there's only 4 to rotate between and if you are like me and not fond of CBR or POFQ, then that really limits selection![]()