MickeyMinnieMom
If you ticket it, they will come... ;)
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2007
- Messages
- 10,996
First, there is nothing there that suggests that Disney was one of only two sources that the Federal Government consulted. Just saying that out loud shows how nonsensical it is. Really? The U.S. Government looked to only two sources for assistance on security issues after 9/11? No way.
Second, consulting on biometrics (finger print scanners and facial recognition) is not really the same thing as consulting on how to avoid and react to a terror attack. It certainly feeds into the overall plan. But the original post that cited to this point made it sound as if we are all safer at WDW because WDW has some great anti-terror plan in place that was better than the government's. Reading the fingerprint on your index finger is not exactly the equivalent of warding off a terror threat. It's great to know that Disney has highly sophisticated technology in place. But let's not make it sound as if their technology is unique to the point of being ahead of the NSA, CIA and FBI when it comes to overall terror profiling.
I'm not going to get into some massive debate over this -- silly, IMO. I just shared a link I found after two seconds of Googling the topic.
Take out the "one of two sources" piece, let's say -- I agree there had to be more -- or at least I sure hope so (!!) -- but look at the US government even just YESTERDAY on the issue of the terrorism threat -- who knows how much advice they sought?!?

I don't think PP suggested that WDW was "ahead of the NSA, CIA and FBI" -- what I extracted was that the government had sought Disney's advice after 9/11 on security issues -- which they did -- and that you're likely safer there than many other places on 9/11 or any other day.
I don't think anyone was suggesting that Disney specializes in terror profiling. I mean, how would they make the MASSIVE PROFITS off of that?!?
