Yes I am aware of that and I still say no.
And if a kid isn't performing well enough to keep a scholarship, they'd be the first one fired in a "paid athlete" scenario.
And if a kid isn't performing well enough to keep a scholarship, they'd be the first one fired in a "paid athlete" scenario.
Were you an NCAA athlete? Because you're typing quite a bit of information that's inaccurate.
First of all, yes, scholarships can be pulled - but NOT if the coach "doesn't like you". It has to do with your performance on the field as well as your performance in the classroom as well as your conduct when not in school or on the field. In addition to being reduced, they can also be INCREASED each year if your performance improved. It's not as fragile as you make it seem.
Also, the school absolutely pays for medical costs. I was injured while competing and required months of rehab, expensive massage and training treatments, electric stim treatments, prescription medications, all of which were paid for by my school. I never paid a dime. And I was just a lowly swimmer! And to revisit your point before - even when injured, scholarships were not taken away. When a star football guy blew out 3 of his 4 knee ligaments and was told he might never play again, he still didn't lose his scholarship.
And regarding your final comment about abolishing athletic scholarships and having people only play sports via intramurals, are you therefore saying that you no longer want there to be NCAA athletic competition at all?
The coach needs no reason to pull a scholarship. If decides to changes his offense and the player no longer fits then the coach can let him go.
Let's not kid ourselves, college football and basketball is all about the money.
The kids see their head coach pulling in millions each year and would like some of that action. The athletes are risking life and limb, not the coaches. But wait -- the guys also get mega training, improve their skills, and if it weren't for the university, how would the pro-scouts know they exist?
As a PP mentioned, I'm concerned about how much each player would get paid and how much of it would be under the table (like it is today) from wealthy alum. Would there be a salary cap?
I don't think they should get paid, but not all college players are on scholarship. Many are walk ons that get no scholarship for at least the first year and maybe not at all. Others may be getting scholarships for academics or alumni scholarships to help but not athletic scholarships and even then very few are full rides.
There was a basketball player (can't remember his name) complaining during March Madness that he goes to bed "starving" some nights. He said he goes to class and then works his butt off for basketball and can't even afford food while the college and the NCAA are making money off of him. While I absolutely feel sorry for him in the same sense I would feel sorry for anyone who can't afford to eat, I had to wonder who he thought paid for the food college kids eat. If he couldn't afford college after receiving his free tuition scholarship for playing a sport, maybe he should have gone to a community college like thousands of other kids have to do.
All of this. I DID get paid to play sports in college - it's called an athletic scholarship. And if you're going to go dollar for dollar - I made more money swimming in college than I'm making right now! It's hard work but that's what the scholarships are for. Swimming isn't a big money-maker for the school but we still trained 30 hours a week (according to the NCAA some of those practices were 'voluntary' - yeah right). Nobody even came to our meets, so there's no revenue to be generated, but if you're going to pay the baseball/basketball/football guys then I'd expect kickback too lol. And do you only pay in the years that your team is winning? Because folks don't fill the stands the same way if you have a losing record. Talk about a can of worms.... To be honest, I was very, very close with a lot of the football players when I was there because the student athletes tend to stick together. The ones that are good - the ones that are pushing to have agents and be paid while still in college - are the ones that will probably be drafted anyway. How about just shut up and wait until you can get some millions. In the meantime just be happy that you're getting your tuition, housing, and food paid for (again, TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS). K? An exception is the Ivy Leagues who don't give athletic scholarships or the DIII schools that also do not, but when I was being recruited by colleges, including a couple of Ivies, it was made very clear to me that "academic monies could be made available to help out"....
The vast majority of coaches aren't pulling in millions. There was a basketball player (can't remember his name) complaining during March Madness that he goes to bed "starving" some nights. He said he goes to class and then works his butt off for basketball and can't even afford food while the college and the NCAA are making money off of him. While I absolutely feel sorry for him in the same sense I would feel sorry for anyone who can't afford to eat, I had to wonder who he thought paid for the food college kids eat. If he couldn't afford college after receiving his free tuition scholarship for playing a sport, maybe he should have gone to a community college like thousands of other kids have to do.
He is a Uconn player and is on the "all-you-can-eat" meal plan (free with his scholarship).



While athletics are wonderful, I truly do not understand why it is necessary for universities to have sports programs that require millions of dollars of support. College should be about academics, not athletics. I realize that there are many students who get to college because of athletic scholarships, but in the long term I would love to see a cultural shift to stressing academics over sports at schools, so that more students get to college on academic and not athletic scholarship.
The schools that require millions of dollars of support are the minority, same with the students on athletic scholarship. The athletic numbers are small compared to overall scholarships.
I think there is too much emphasis placed on athletics at certain schools, but they also make a lot of money off those sports. It's a win-win for the school (and community) in most (big school) cases.
The schools that require millions of dollars of support are the minority, same with the students on athletic scholarship. The athletic numbers are small compared to overall scholarships.
I think there is too much emphasis placed on athletics at certain schools, but they also make a lot of money off those sports. It's a win-win for the school (and community) in most (big school) cases.
The coach needs no reason to pull a scholarship. If decides to changes his offense and the player no longer fits then the coach can let him go.
Let's not kid ourselves, college football and basketball is all about the money.