Zippa D Doodah
<font color=red>Suffering from Fairy Alienation.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2003
- Messages
- 16,532
A fascinating issue of Time came out a couple of weeks ago. [I know, I know; I am behind on my bathroom reading
] It was all about the human brain. In one article Steven Pinker interviewed an array of his fellow materialists, getting their insight on the relationship of the brain and the mind. Several of the contributors (most notablly Daniel Denton) put forth the idea that "you" as a person do not actually exist. Whatever concsiousness you experience is nothing other than the result of firing neurons. There is no "you" sitting at the controls of your consciousness taking in all that the senses provide and reacting accordingly. No soul; no individual identity; just chemical reaction in the brain.
Nothing in the article was particularly new; the ideas put forth there have been around for years. I thought it was interesting to see it in a mass forum like time. Anyhow, it got me to thinking again. If there is no "me" aside from the biology of my brain, how am I to account for the choises I make? Or is that a moot point? What of love, hatred, joy, morality, beauty, pleasure, immorality, pain, etc etc? Do they exist? Do they matter?
To start, I do think there is much we have yet to learn about our brains, and how the brain and the mind connect and overlap. Yet such a minimalist view of identity (whether you are a religious person or not) seems too simple. Anybody else spend cold winter days thinking about such things?
] It was all about the human brain. In one article Steven Pinker interviewed an array of his fellow materialists, getting their insight on the relationship of the brain and the mind. Several of the contributors (most notablly Daniel Denton) put forth the idea that "you" as a person do not actually exist. Whatever concsiousness you experience is nothing other than the result of firing neurons. There is no "you" sitting at the controls of your consciousness taking in all that the senses provide and reacting accordingly. No soul; no individual identity; just chemical reaction in the brain.Nothing in the article was particularly new; the ideas put forth there have been around for years. I thought it was interesting to see it in a mass forum like time. Anyhow, it got me to thinking again. If there is no "me" aside from the biology of my brain, how am I to account for the choises I make? Or is that a moot point? What of love, hatred, joy, morality, beauty, pleasure, immorality, pain, etc etc? Do they exist? Do they matter?
To start, I do think there is much we have yet to learn about our brains, and how the brain and the mind connect and overlap. Yet such a minimalist view of identity (whether you are a religious person or not) seems too simple. Anybody else spend cold winter days thinking about such things?

I was just thinking that I am not smart enough to read this thread.

I was thinking the same thing.
<--- I like this little guy
The "I" doesn't really exist.
, I love him. 
