Everything I described describes California too. It's even worse out there because they have an agribusiness organic lobby that defends these practices with an almost religious ferver.
Raw Milk? Yet another scam.
The facts.
1. Pasteurization does not eliminate or destroy any nutrient that milk is a good source of.
Fats, lactose. These are unaffected.
Proteins and minerals, these are unaffected.
Vitamin A. Actually increased by pasteurization.
Vitamin's B1, B12, C, and E are indeed reduced by pasteurization. But no matter. Milk is not a good source for these to begin with.
Vitamin D, contrary to myth of the raw milk advocates, it was never in there to begin with. Pasteurization did not eliminate it. It was fortified along with several other things way back because of rickets.
Lactobacillis. Our bodies produce it naturally. We don't need to get it from Milk.
2. Without qualification, Raw Milk is more dangerous than is Pasteurized. About 80% of reports of tainted milk caused sicknesses, hospitalizations, and death to the CDC involve Raw Milk or products made with it. Just 20% involve Pasteurized. And Pasteurized share of the market dwarfs that of raw. It isn't a huge risk., nor even a big one. It has been so far a small one. Will it remain so if raw milk gains any sort of share in the market though? Anyway it's a risk that doesn't have to be taken given virtually no benefit. T
3. Raw milk has not been scientifically shown to prevent, nor cure any disease. None.
This whole idea that exposing one to more stuff makes the body immune is well not a good one. That is essentially what Vaccines do. If Raw milk truly inocculated against the things its advocates say it does, some enterprising company would have made a vaccine with it long ago.
If you’ve ever been to a dairy farm you’d never, ever drink raw milk.