Do you boycott companies?

katerkat

I wine a lot...it makes me feel better
Joined
Jan 20, 2003
Messages
7,381
Just a thought from another website that's encouraging moms to boycott Boppy because the ads show bottlefeeding. They think Boppy is not compatible with breastfeeding ideals and should be boycotted. I :lovestruc my Boppy and Russ and I use it for so much more than breastfeeding, so I'm not sure why the company should be marketing it as just a breastfeeding tool - after all, they're in it to make money, not simply to promote breastfeeding.

What would make you boycott a company? Is it useful?
 
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: Sorry, but what a stupid reason to boycott them. :rotfl: All kinds of mothers (and fathers ;) ) use the product for a variety of reasons, and because they show a bottle in their ads, it's wrong?

I've never boycotted any company -- usually for that very reason, that fact that the majority of boycotts are for stupid reasons. :rolleyes:
 
What would make you boycott a company? Is it useful?

for me it really depends. i would never boycott a company if the ceo or higher up held views different than mine and donated money to that cause (assuming what he/she was doing was legal). i'm anti-union, so i cross picket lines.

actually, it is hard for me to think of a time when i would boycott a company (again assuming they were operating within the law), but maybe there would be a time when i did it.

in general, i do not think boycotts are productive. most of the time it hardly makes s dent to the company people are boycotting. the only time it is really effective is when the boycott is well organized and you can get a significant number of people to buy in to it. i have rarely seen that happen.
 
I don't for something like that. But I was medically unable to breastfeed my children so I tend to look at those types of people as what can be referred to as "**** nazis". :) They only see THEIR way as the right way and how dare this company show any other way. :rolleyes: Now, if the ads showed somebody using a Boppy to hold a child up while they beat them, then I'd be more than just boycotting. So I guess for me it depends on the situations.
 

There are some products I refuse to buy on the basis that I hate their commercials (like Clairol Herbal Essences hair products). However, since a lot of different products are owned by the same company, I'm sure Clairol is getting money from me some way or another.
 
I don't know if this is considered boycotting, but years ago I refused to use any L'Oreal or Lancome products because they did such horrible animal testing. They've since stopped.

As far as the Boppy thing goes, I would definitely NOT boycot them because they show a baby being bottle fed (I don't think they're intended to be used for breastfeeding exclusively - more of a tool to help mom hold the baby more comfortably no matter if she's bottle or breastfeeding). That sounds a little over-the-top, but that's just my humble opinion.
 
One time we'd just purchased a new Ford. It had 2000 miles on it when we made the purchase and never questioned that it was sold under a used title. The car ran great and I can't say that I ever had any problems with it, but one night my husband got a call from a mechanic who worked at the garage where we'd made the purchase. It seems that the man who owned the dealership was dating a woman who also worked there and she was an alcoholic. She was allowed to take cars left and right off that lot for her own personal pleasures. Well, this mechanic told us that this woman had totaled our car and that he was put in charge of fixing it and this included straightening the frame among other things. He also went on to tell us how we weren't an isolated case and put my husband in contact with others who'd had this happen to their automobiles as well.

We took our car to several other dealerships (mechanics) to see if any of this was true. All said that the car was wrecked, but there would be no way we could take on Ford in a lawsuit because it would cost more in legal fees and that they hire the best in attorneys.

We did contact Ford and though Ford eventually closed the dealership down, they did NOTHING to back their product up where we were concerned.

Well, I will NEVER buy another one of their products as long as I live. I don't fault them for what this dealership did, but I do fault them because the dealership represented them, and they did NOTHING!

I also encourage everyone I know not to buy from them and I've lost them several sales via family and friends since that time.

It's the ONLY company I've ever boycotted.
 
We use Boppys in our church nursery, and it's not because we're using them to breastfeed the kids LOL!!!!!!!

I only have one company (that comes ot mind) that I refuse to give business to out of principle and that's Blockbuster. I guess that's boycotting.
 
I might boycott something if I felt very strongly about it, not because I felt my boycott would have any effect on the company, but just for my own peace of mind.

As for Boppy - that is insane. My favorite use for my Boppy was to put it around my kids when they were first learning to sit up. And - God forbid - DH used it when holding the kids, too.

Denae
 
I've boycotted Abercrombie and Fitch because of their advertising. They aren't selling clothes. They're selling sex, and I'm not buying it for my teenager.
 
I will never buy my children anything from Abercrombie and Fitch. I can't stand their advertising.... to me it borders on child porn.
 
I boycotted a local magazine store (known primarily as the "dirty book store" to youth thruout the area because they changed their policy at one point to keep the porn too accessable to children. As soon as they put it back up where the pics weren't in the faces of toddlers, we started shopping there again. (They have the best selection (read only) of magazines and newpapers within an hours drive.
 
Oh for the LOVE of God...Give me a break. That was the whole reason I got my Boppy in the first place and when I didn't end up breastfeeding, I never used it. It's at my inlaws right now collecting dust.
I'm putting on my flame suit but I'm thinking that some people have absolutely nothing better to do with their time than be **** zealots...So WHAT if they show someone bottle feeding? Don't they also show moms breastfeeding? I feel like I've seen countless ads for the boppy with a mom and baby breastfeeding. Besides, can the zealots prove that that's formula in the bottle and not pumped breastmilk?
Will this bottle vs **** argument ever end?
 
Yep, I've been known to boycot in my day. Most recently, I refused to patronize Cracker Barrel and any of their subsidiaries because of their discriminatory hiring policies. They instituted a company policy that called for terminating employees "whose sexual preferences fail to demonstrate normal heterosexual values, which have been the foundation of families in our society." As a result, eleven employees were fired. Enough for me to refuse to spend my money on them.

Although it took 10 years, they have since changed their position and added sexual orientation to the company's nondiscrimination policy in December, 2002. That said, I'd gladly dine at Cracker Barrel now.
 
That's the silliest thing I"ve heard all day long. I love my Boppy (even though it kinda needs to be washed cuz it's FILTHY at the moment).

Darn b00bnazis...they are at it again. It has to be their way or the highway because as well know, formula causes your children to grow up to be drooling, mindless idiots who will need special care the rest of their lives. All because YOU YOU YOU were selfish enough not to use your b00bs for their intended purpose.Nope..don't care if there was a 'medical' reason. YOU should've breastfed! I don't care if it hurt, if you didn't make any milk, if you thought it was not fun. YOU still SHOULD have breastfed. There are those of us who have SUFFERED through the thrush, cracked nipples, relactating and forcing extended breastfeeding on our kids and we survived. YOU are a BAD PARENT! :rolleyes:***



***Note...that entire rant was intended to be sarcastic. It is the POV I've gotten from a lot of b00bie bullies. I do not hold any of the above views at all. I, in fact, formula fed DS and he's just fine. While breast is best, formula won't kill your child. Nor will it make them drooling mindless idiots. Breast may be the best, BUT formula is an acceptable substitute.***

*dons flame suit*

TOV
 
katerkat said:
Just a thought from another website that's encouraging moms to boycott Boppy because the ads show bottlefeeding. They think Boppy is not compatible with breastfeeding ideals and should be boycotted. I :lovestruc my Boppy and Russ and I use it for so much more than breastfeeding, so I'm not sure why the company should be marketing it as just a breastfeeding tool - after all, they're in it to make money, not simply to promote breastfeeding.

What would make you boycott a company? Is it useful?
Its's not a company but I will not buy or listen to anything by the Foo Fighters..They advertize and support groups that teach that AIDS is a myth and does not really exist. They even link to them on their web-sites
The site says among other things

AIDS is a toxic disease caused by either long-term recreational drug abuse or short-term anti-HIV medications," writes a 22-year-old member of the Alive and Well-affiliated Students Reappraising AIDS on the Foo Fighters' Web-based message board. "HIV is not spread sexually, nor is it the cause of any disease
 
JennyMominRI said:
Its's not a company but I will not buy or listen to anything by the Foo Fighters..They advertize and support groups that teach that AIDS is a myth and does not really exist. They even link to them on their web-sites
The site says among other things

AIDS is a toxic disease caused by either long-term recreational drug abuse or short-term anti-HIV medications," writes a 22-year-old member of the Alive and Well-affiliated Students Reappraising AIDS on the Foo Fighters' Web-based message board. "HIV is not spread sexually, nor is it the cause of any disease

Holy CRAP! I have to look into this now! Thanks for the heads up!
 
And, how do these people know that it's not breastmilk in that bottle!?

Totally stupid boycott.
 
RickinNYC said:
Holy CRAP! I have to look into this now! Thanks for the heads up!
Here is one article

News: A platinum-selling alt-rock group may be endangering their fans by promoting a dangerous myth.

By Silja J.A. Talvi

February 25, 2000





Some rock stars want to free Tibet. Others want to save Mumia. The Foo Fighters, on the other hand, want their fans to ignore accepted medical wisdom about AIDS.

The multimillion-album-selling alternative rock outfit has thrown its weight behind Alive and Well, an "alternative AIDS information group" that denies any link between HIV and AIDS. In January, Foo Fighters bassist Nate Mendel helped organize a sold-out concert in Hollywood to benefit the group. Foo fans were treated to a speech by Alive and Well founder Christine Maggiore, who believes AIDS may be caused by HIV-related medications, anal sex, stress, and drug use, and implies that people should not get tested for HIV nor take medications to counter the virus. Free copies of Maggiore's self-published book, "What If Everything You Thought You Knew About AIDS Was Wrong?," in which she declares "there is no proof that HIV causes AIDS," were also passed out to the concert-goers.

HIV experts are alarmed by the possible impact of the Foo Fighters' embrace of Maggiore's theories on their potentially gullible young fans.

"Clearly, more research is needed on the factors that contribute to HIV infection and the development of AIDS," says Dorcus Crumbley of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention. "However, the conclusions of more than two decades of epidemiologic, virologic, and medical research are that HIV infection is transmissible through sexual contact, injecting drug use, perinatally, and from receiving blood or blood products ... (and) the scientific evidence is overwhelming that HIV is the cause of AIDS."

Adds Crumbley: "The myth that HIV is not the primary cause of AIDS ... could cause (HIV-positive people) to reject treatment critical for their own health and for preventing transmission to others."

"When it comes to such a complex health topic, it behooves the band to have really researched what they are endorsing," says Diane Tanaka, an attending physician at the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, where she works with a large population of high-risk and HIV-infected low-income youth. "(The Foo Fighters) have a big responsibility in terms of (their) public role and the impact that they can have on young people. Is this band willing to take responsibility for a young person engaging in risky, unprotected sex because of information they've gotten from the (Foo Fighters) or from Alive and Well?"

Alive and Well is one of several fringe groups that deny a link between HIV and AIDS. Similar theories have been put forth over the years by various far-right groups and anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists, and other so-called "HIV-refuseniks."

"Your risk of being hit by lightning is greater than that of contracting HIV through a one-time random sexual contact with someone you don't know here in America," says Maggiore, an HIV-positive Southern California resident with no formal training in medicine or the sciences. "And if (a young person) were to get a positive diagnosis, that does not mean they've been infected with HIV." The HIV-AIDS connection, maintains Maggiore, has been promoted by greedy drug companies.

Mendel says he was won over by Maggiore's book, and passed it around to the rest of the band, which includes former Nirvana drummer Dave Grohl. Mendel says that he would steer anyone considering an HIV antibody test toward Maggiore's group.

"If you test positive, you are pretty much given a bleak outlook and told to take toxic drugs to possibly ward off new infections," says Mendel.

With the other band members on board, Mendel aims to use the Foo Fighters' celebrity to get the message out to a broad audience. The Foo Fighters plan additional benefit shows, and have placed a banner ad on their Web site linking to Alive and Well. Mendel says that he does not have HIV, nor does he have any friends with HIV besides Maggiore, who has remained asymptomatic.

The most recent numbers from the Joint United Nations' HIV/AIDS Program estimate that 16.3 million people worldwide have died of AIDS-related causes since 1981. Medical research in the United States indicates that as many as 25 percent of the nation's estimated 40,000 annual HIV infections occur among 13- to 21-year-olds. Maggiore, however, maintains that worldwide HIV infections and AIDS deaths are exaggerated by the CDC and the World Health Organization, even in regions like sub-Saharan Africa, where two-thirds of the world's HIV-infected people live.

Maggiore's message has apparently penetrated the minds of at least some Foo aficionados. She says she has heard from many Foo fans since the show -- one of whom, she says, now works at the Alive and Well office.

"AIDS is a toxic disease caused by either long-term recreational drug abuse or short-term anti-HIV medications," writes a 22-year-old member of the Alive and Well-affiliated Students Reappraising AIDS on the Foo Fighters' Web-based message board. "HIV is not spread sexually, nor is it the cause of any disease."

Other fans are less impressed. Damian Purdy, a 21-year-old Winnipeg, Canada resident and devoted Foo Fighters fan, is outraged by the band's position. "By supporting this, the Foo Fighters have entered an arena that they have no business being in. The truth is that a rock concert is not the appropriate platform for these views to be expressed. I think the Foo Fighters have more influence than they realize," he says.

For his part, Mendel remains convinced that the media and the medical establishment are keeping the truth about HIV and AIDS from the public. The Foo Fighters, he insists, will continue to use their celebrity to bring "light to the issue."

Is he worried that the group might be endangering the lives of some of its listeners?

"I'm absolutely confident that I'm doing the right thing," Mendel answers. "No, I wouldn't feel responsible for possibly harming somebody. I (feel) I'm doing the opposite
 
WTH?? :confused3 AIDS doesn't really exist? Where on earth did they get THAT idea?

They must be from outer space if they think that AIDS doesn't exist. :teleport: :rolleyes1 :rolleyes2 :eek: :crazy2:

TOV
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer

New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom