I'm not familiar with Ride Max itineraries, but is it true they have folks touring for 2-3 hours prior to picking up a FP?
hound
If that is the most efficient way to complete the desired itinerary then yes, it won't have people picking up a FP for 2-3 hours after opening. Keep in mind when the user inputs desired attractions, it gives the most efficient way to complete that list
AND NOTHING MORE. So if the list is light on fast pass attractions, particularly if those attractions do not go through their fast passes quickly, it might indeed not have the first fast pass pick up for 2-3 hours. Adding things to it could change the order of what it just spit out quite a bit, or not at all depending upon what is the most efficient order to complete the new itinerary.
Getting to the OP's itinerary, I can tell you what Ridemax was thinking. I recall a similar itinerary and I gave similar results.
She's got Nemo over on the TL side of the park. It's far more important to get there than to get that first fast pass when you're only doing one fast pass attraction in the itinerary. Once there, she's got Autopia, which can build long waits quickly, is out in the sun, AND the fast pass line itself can fill up and it's right next to Nemo. Can you say spillover? I'd put that second too.
Buzz is normally of lesser importance but it's her last ride over there and there could be some spillover there too.
I would have had her getting the FP for Indy next, but ridemax has the cruise next. The time difference in the return time of the indy fast pass was probably such that it wouldn't make much difference time wise, so it opted to save walking time. The tree house is curious. I'm sure ridemax determined that it wouldn't make all that much difference time wise on the rides placed after it and put it where it was convenient. The rest is pretty straight forward. She's got rides that do build mid day, but don't build long waits quite as quickly.
So yes. I'd agree with ridemax here.