Unless DVC reclassified them, there are also some SV rooms to the far left in the image above. My understanding is they were classified as SV due to the old tent-like building that was part of the sales facilities. Those rooms had virtually no view when the tent was still up.
We were on the 3rd floor--room 3001.
![]()
Looks like you might have a canal view if you happen to be at the very end of the standard view room hallway.
3002 maybe? The odd numbers are across the hall and BW view.
Don't these once standard view rooms now overlook a croquet lawn, therefore making DVC able to classify them as "garden-view?"
I doubt DVC could simply re-classify rooms at will and start charging more points. Ownership in any given resort is based upon the premise that the point chart is set at a certain level with little flexibility to change.
All "views" will see subtle changes over their useful life. I don't see that as valid justification for re-classifying sections of a resort that have already been added to the condo association inventory.
Crisi's post suggests that DVC may have done a swap--moving an equal number of rooms from SV to PV and vice-versa. That seems like a more sensible (and legal!) approach to take.