Since when is it the counselors job to supervise the teens after they leave common grounds or to keep them from smoking on the ship? Have you heard about PARENTAL responsibility?? There is no smoking in Common Grounds, but there are no rules that prohibit smoking by minors in the smoking acceptable areas on board. It isn't the job of the counselors to "rat out" smokers, for all they know the parents know that their kid smokes and either condone it or feel that there are bigger battles to fight. As far as the smoking goes, it's none of your business, so butt out. (No pun intended)
Personally had my child been 13, I wouldn't have let them stay out until 2:00am regardless! I do agree, they should have a seperate group for 13 and 14 year olds, most 13 year olds are not mature as, nor do they share the same interests as a 16 or 17 year old. And a lot of 13 year olds are not mature enough to handle themselves appropriately in a minimally supervised setting, sounds like your daughter might have been one of those based on the fact that she couldnt' obey curfew.
We were on the Magic last summer, when my son was 16. I set my alarm each night when I went to bed before him so I knew that he was back in the cabin by curfew, which varied from night to night based on scheduled activities and shore excursions. I took an active role in parental responsibility. If you think 2:00am is too late for your child, give them a curfew. Don't impose your values on all the other teens on board.
You didn't "hand your kids over" as they can come and go as they please in and out of CG. If they wre uncomfortable, they should have left and told you so immediately so you address your concerns. It sounds to me like first off, your child probably knows a lot of things and is doing a lot of things that you aren't aware of. If they were concerned or offended, they would have said something to you, rather than your finding out by eavesdropping on their conversation. If this isn't the case, then perhaps your child should have been stepped down to the 10-12 year old group which might have been more to their maturity level. Just because a child reaches 13, doesn't mean they have the maturity level of a "teen".
Now, IF what your are describing did actually happen, then yes, it was inappropriate. However I wonder how much of it was quite embellished on...
Anne