Disney Names Ex-P&G Chief As New Chairman

Status
Not open for further replies.

crazy4wdw

Moderator - Restaurant Board
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2001
Messages
9,289
Disney Names Ex-P&G Chief As New Chairman

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Walt Disney Co. said Thursday that it has named former Procter & Gamble Co. Chairman John E. Pepper Jr. to succeed Sen. George J. Mitchell as nonexecutive chairman effective Jan. 1.

Mitchell was named chairman in 2004. He had planned to retire at the company's 2006 annual meeting, but last December was asked by the board to postpone his plans. With Pepper now named to the post, Mitchell will retire from the board Dec. 31.

Mitchell became chairman after a 2004 shareholder's meeting at which 45% of Disney voting stockholders withheld their votes for the re-election of then Chairman and Chief Executive Michael Eisner.

In a statement Thursday, Disney President and Chief Executive Robert Iger praised Mitchell as an extraordinary leader.

Mitchell said in a statement that the board went through a "thoughtful and deliberate" approach to finding a successor. "With the election of John as Chairman, Disney will benefit from his outstanding leadership skills and unique experience in cultivating global brands," he said.

Alan Gould, an analyst with Natexis Bleichroeder Inc., said Pepper's consumer products background will help him contribute at Disney. Consumer products accounted for 7% of Disney's revenue in the six months ended April 1, and 13% of its segment operating income.

"A large portion of Disney's profit have come from the consumer products," Gould said.

Pepper was one of the most popular executives at Procter & Gamble. One reason: he emphasized career development programs and leadership training, considered soft in the often cut-throat environment at P&G. One of his colleagues referred to him as "Jiminy Pepper," the conscience of the company.

He became chairman and chief executive of Procter & Gamble in 1995 and retired from the company in 2002.

"It's interesting that it's not Steve Jobs," Gould said, referring to the Apple Computer chief executive. Jobs joined Disney's board after the entertainment giant bought his other company, Pixar Animation Studios, for about $7.4 billion in stock.

Shares of Disney closed down 3 cents, or 0.1%, at $29.38 Wednesday. They are up 13.6% over the past year.

-By Dwight Oestricher, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5266;
 
So te Eisner era is officially over. Can we now admit that Iger is his own man?
pirate:
 

Wonder what Roy thinks about this? :confused3 He has been suspiciously silent since his return to the fold, as it were. Both of the people he was after are now gone, or in Mitchells case, has one foot out the door.
Hey George, don't let the door hit you in the a_ _ on the way out! :wave:
 
DVCconvert said:
He is very happy with this change! :)

Just wondering, have you read something somewhere regarding this info? Since Roy closed SaveDisney.com, I have not read a thing about what he has been doing.
 
Who really cares what Roy thinks?

Mitchell had to go, but I think he gets a bid of a bad rap. If you read between the lines, I think he was instrumental in getting Eisner to step down early, and he kept his promise to only stay in the chairmanship for a transitional period.

And, while the jury on Iger is still out, it seems clear that he's not just Eisner's puppet, as suspected when Mitchell et. al. picked him.
 
DancingBear said:
Who really cares what Roy thinks?

Mitchell had to go, but I think he gets a bid of a bad rap. If you read between the lines, I think he was instrumental in getting Eisner to step down early, and he kept his promise to only stay in the chairmanship for a transitional period.

And, while the jury on Iger is still out, it seems clear that he's not just Eisner's puppet, as suspected when Mitchell et. al. picked him.

Uh, it's not so much that I particularly CARE about what Roy thinks. {sorry if I offended you} I'm just WONDERING what he thinks.
Also, I'm not sure I understand your last sentence. :confused3
 
Roy thinks that living in Castles and Sailing boats and very very ocassionally caring about his family's legacy is pretty awesome. I'm more interested in what Walt's family thinks.



Oh, and Iger being his own man may or may not be true. There are a few offices that still need to be cleaned out, but either way, the question now is, even if he had a good idea, could he actually get it implemented?
 
Ha ha, that's funny.
As everyone knows, Roy gave Walt's side of the family the finger 20+ years ago. They don't get along. So, again, I'd like to know what Walt's family thinks.
 
Well, I had no idea we had a member of the family on this board. Owns DVC too. Seems a little ridiculous, that one might have to, but what do I know.



20 years of anger and distrust don't change overnight as it were.
 
but what do I know.

Good Point YoHo!

Ya know (or perhaps you don't?) as folks grow older -- they tend to have an improved sense of their own mortality. When that happens -- alot of human beings find it easier to forgive and forget -- and to move on in a larger sense to appreciate 'family' ( something you can't pick-unlike you're friends ). But a family has a shared history that isn't easy to dismiss (dispite some bumps in the road of life).

In your first post you asked (stated) "who cares what Roy thinks'?) I suppose it's justifiably equal to ask/say 'who cares' what you or I think?

The possible exception to this, by virture of Roy's nearly lifetime of involvement with the company and it's feature animation division specificially, seems to present an ethical problem when one asks why should one care what Roy thinks.
 
That's a whole lot of words to convey the message "nu-uh."

The fact that literally until Eisner was removed from office the two sides of the family did not get along with each other at all, suggests that any reconcilliation is for show. It sounds nice, but is irrisponsible to make such an assumption.

And Roy did very little realistically except when he was forced to. This was about getting back at the people who called him the idiot nephew. Any other interpretation is romanticizing the situation.



Ignoring all that, nobody needs to care what I think, but I am allowed to think it none the less. And regardless of this pointless bickering, my question stands.

What does Walt's family, Walt's direct family think about this?
 
DVCconvert said:
In your first post you asked (stated) "who cares what Roy thinks'?)
Nope, that was me. It's a shorthand version of saying that I don't think Roy did much of anything except protect his personal interests. He didn't take any real action until he was shoved off the board. When Iger intervened and gave Roy a meaningless honorary title, Roy dropped the lawsuit against Mitchell, et. al. (which claimed Iger never should have been named CEO) and went back to his sailing.

The possible exception to this, by virture of Roy's nearly lifetime of involvement with the company and it's feature animation division specificially, seems to present an ethical problem when one asks why should one care what Roy thinks.
An ethical problem?

DVCconvert said:
He is very happy with this change!
Care to tell us the basis for this statement?
 
Kudos! An actual name of an actual person! So tired of the "I know someone but can't reveal any information" posts. Thanks.
 
And Roy did very little realistically except when he was forced to. This was about getting back at the people who called him the idiot nephew. Any other interpretation is romanticizing the situation.

Despite what you may wish to believe -- that is simply not true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE


New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom