DisneyAlly
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2002
- Messages
- 221
I'd like to give my opinion on this ordeal.
Wouldnt you think:
.....it would be reasonable to say that Disney should know within a day or so that their server that controls bookings (which obviously is directly connected to a large chunk of revenue) went down? If the server that controls production in my company went down, I WILL know about it within a day.
....And if that were true, wouldnt you feel that there would be some due diligence performed to look into it further to determine whether an over-booking condition occurred because of this downed server?
....And if it was determined the problem caused an overbooking, wouldnt you think that Dinsey should have contacted the people effected immediately?
....And if those people who were contacted immediately and notified of the error didnt already book airfare, put in notice to their jobs for vacation, cancel daycare/childcare for the week, etc, that they be given a chance to re-book on a different date or decide just to cancel altogether?
I'm a huge fan of Disney, but in this case, it does seem there could have been some "bait and switch" activity. If they truly discovered the error this late, then more the reason to award a true upgrade due to their mistake. Do they NEED to do it, No, apparently legally not, but should they? In my opinion yes. Disney branded itself on delivering "magic" and they receive a good price for it. For this reason, when they fall short on delivery, they should make good for the people who really feel that they were cheated for whatever reason. It's just not the same to go to check in to the Holiday Inn, and get walked to the LaQuinta across the street, so IMHO, the defense that Hotels overbook all the time should not apply here.
BTW, I travel frequently on business and only had to be moved to a hotel once due to what was explained to me as a unforeseen maintenance problem in the room, and without asking for anything, was given a suite in a hotel down the street which was much nicer than the room I would have stayed in. Their response is that they valued my business and didnt want to lose me as a customer. So go figure.
John
You made a lot of valid points. They had to know this problem earlier and should have contacted affected parties much sooner.
Seems to me they were waiting till 5 days before check in to see if guests on room only rate will cancel before they decide if they are truly overbooked.