max'sdad
Earning My Ears
- Joined
- May 10, 2010
- Messages
- 53
I listened to the podcast on free dining and was surprised the podcast crew was so quick to dismiss the quick service dining plan.
On our trip last year, we did the regular dining plan (which we paid for), this year, we're doing free dining with the quick service plan only.
Though we enjoyed many of our meals last year, particularly Boma, Ohana, Chef Mickey and Rose and Crown (which we liked better than Le Cellier), We don't feel it's worth the extra expense and time.
First, you not only have to factor in the $10 price difference per adult, but you also should factor in $5 to $7 per adult for tip. So that's $15 to $17 to replace a counter service with a table service meal - which is reasonable, but you also lose one snack per day (QSDP gives you two snacks per day) and don't get the refillable mug. You can equate the value of those at maybe $4 or $5 a day, so essentially, you're now at a $20 per day price difference in the plans when you factor everything.
So from a value standpoint, I don't think it's necessarily a no-brainer to upgrade. Particularly after listening to the podcast crew mention the crowds at the restaurants and the dumbed-down menus.
After listening, it sounded like they had a lot more complaints about sit-down restaurants than they did about counter-service. We really enjoyed many of our counter-service meals. I can note in particular the sandwiches at Starring Rolls in DHS, the African Stew at Mara in AKL, the flatbread pizza and rosemary chicken at Wolfgang Puck Express in downtown Disney and the incredible selection at Sunshine Seasons in Epcot. We didn't get a chance to try the counter service in World Showcase, so that's something that's on my list.
I guess what decided things for us, is that last year a sit-down meal typically meant a 2 to 2-1/2 hour time commitment. Though we enjoyed our meals, it was time away from touring the parks. Plus, our 8-year-old is not the most patient kid when it comes to sitting down and waiting for meals, which is why the one table service we're going to pay out of pocket for is the buffet Chef Mickey's, which was our son's favorite.
So less expense, more time in the parks, the flexibility to be in whatever park we want, not being tied down by an ADR, and still being able to find a good selection of quality food that goes beyond burgers and hot dogs is the reason we're not upgrading to the regular dining plan.
Am I alone in thinking this way?
On our trip last year, we did the regular dining plan (which we paid for), this year, we're doing free dining with the quick service plan only.
Though we enjoyed many of our meals last year, particularly Boma, Ohana, Chef Mickey and Rose and Crown (which we liked better than Le Cellier), We don't feel it's worth the extra expense and time.
First, you not only have to factor in the $10 price difference per adult, but you also should factor in $5 to $7 per adult for tip. So that's $15 to $17 to replace a counter service with a table service meal - which is reasonable, but you also lose one snack per day (QSDP gives you two snacks per day) and don't get the refillable mug. You can equate the value of those at maybe $4 or $5 a day, so essentially, you're now at a $20 per day price difference in the plans when you factor everything.
So from a value standpoint, I don't think it's necessarily a no-brainer to upgrade. Particularly after listening to the podcast crew mention the crowds at the restaurants and the dumbed-down menus.
After listening, it sounded like they had a lot more complaints about sit-down restaurants than they did about counter-service. We really enjoyed many of our counter-service meals. I can note in particular the sandwiches at Starring Rolls in DHS, the African Stew at Mara in AKL, the flatbread pizza and rosemary chicken at Wolfgang Puck Express in downtown Disney and the incredible selection at Sunshine Seasons in Epcot. We didn't get a chance to try the counter service in World Showcase, so that's something that's on my list.
I guess what decided things for us, is that last year a sit-down meal typically meant a 2 to 2-1/2 hour time commitment. Though we enjoyed our meals, it was time away from touring the parks. Plus, our 8-year-old is not the most patient kid when it comes to sitting down and waiting for meals, which is why the one table service we're going to pay out of pocket for is the buffet Chef Mickey's, which was our son's favorite.
So less expense, more time in the parks, the flexibility to be in whatever park we want, not being tied down by an ADR, and still being able to find a good selection of quality food that goes beyond burgers and hot dogs is the reason we're not upgrading to the regular dining plan.
Am I alone in thinking this way?