lookingforward
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2001
- Messages
- 3,065
Denine, I've posted before that the same thing happened to me - after I just ended treatment. The first mamm afterward on the non-BC breast showed a spot. In fact, my surgeon told me, "I'm sorry, it looks like a new cancer". I was devastated, and thought, if this cancer grew through all this chemo I had, I'm a goner.Biopsy was negative, but they wanted to go ahead with an excisional biopsy to be absolutely sure. I waited several weeks because I just wanted to enjoy my kids' birthday, and it was agonizing. I showed up for the excisional biopsy and the spot was gone. My surgeon then and there gave me the option of taking the whole area out, but I decided to wait 3 months for a re-check. The spot has never returned. We think it was a premenstrual change. I was p'd at my surgeon for scaring me like that (and the original radiologist at my medical practice). I now get all my mamms and MRIs at the hospital (mine).
An MRI is actually not definitive. Only a biopsy is - because a pathologist examines the actual tissue under a microscope. There are many false positives with MRI, which then get biopsied. In your case, it's difficult and unreliable to biopsy an area you can't definitively find. I'd probably compromise and ask for a 3 month re-check, and/or get another opinion, possibly an MRI (which may or may not be helpful). Scar tissue can be tricky.
Good advice. I had a reduction and the thing that got me really angry was the fact that they kept attributing slight changes to "surgical changes" simply because I had the breast surgery years ago. (1996). I learned later that many of my fellow survivors were MRI'd early on when I wasn't because they thought they had an explanation for my areas of concern. SO...the women who were MRI'd right away were stage 1 and I found myself at stage 2b. The mammo had been showing two areas of calcification for years but they appeared unchanged. Surprise, surprise when they estimated tumor size on digital mammogram at 1 cm...and up until the biopsy came back my not so brilliant surgeon kept saying it was surgical changes/scar tissue.... and the MRI showed it to be over 2.5. It turned out to be 3 cm. Scary.
Another issue is dense, larger breasts. They are harder to read, right? Oh well, I wish I had had the MRI sooner, but at least it was still on the cusp of "early stage". GAGWTA!