JeanfromBNA
"Just keep swimming, swimming, swimming!"
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Messages
- 1,184
I always thought that a National Park themed resort in the Western U.S. would be an awesome DVC.
The North side of Houston is pretty much the only one of these rumors that makes sense. Both north-south and East-west interstates passes thru, 2 airports, two cruise terminals, large cheap work force availability, ~20 million people within a 6 hour drive, relatively plentiful water, far enough inland that a tropical storm is only a one day event, gets 1-3 freezes year, already a Latin American tourist destination, etc.
Didn't Houston Poop can their cruise terminal? Now I hear Corpus Christi is getting delusions of grandeur.
Count Missouri on the long list of states that have had rumors of Disney buying up lots of land there too.
Galveston has grown rapidly as a cruise terminal the last few years. It is almost entirely supported by Texas and connecting states.
If there was any truth to mid America Disney Land, I think it would go into Houston, San Antonio or somewhere in between. Oklahoma gets too cold in the winter for a year round park. Houston would have no competition also, while San Antonio has Six Flags.
Paris, Tokyo, and Shanghai say you are wrong on the cold thing.
Six Flags and Sea World are unimportant to Disney cause Disney.
I doesn't really make sense for Disney to build another DL/WDW style resort in the US. The two existing resorts are convenient to most of the US population and most international destinations. A new park in the middle somewhere wouldn't dramatically increase the number of people who are going to US Disney parks.
They could have used a DL style park in mid-America but there is no reason to copy WDW.
I agree it probably will never happen because of DVC sales at WDW.
When I lived in Houston I dreamt of a DCL route between Port Canaveral- Houston. 3 days to PC, 5-8 days at WDW and 3 days back to Houston. Stop at Key West one way and Castaway Cay the other way.
It would be easily solved stopping at Castaway Cay in both directions, or Castaway and Freeport. Or Mexico one direction, Castaway the other. Or if the politics ever get cleared up, Castaway and Cuba. I think it's a clever idea, I just wonder how many people would be interested in taking a 6 day cruise broken up into 2 choppy pieces. Let alone everyone has to be at WDW the same amount of time.Too bad they would have to Flag in the US to do a Galveston to PC one-way, with visiting a far away port first. They also can't do an all US itinerary unless they flagged in the US.
Too bad they would have to Flag in the US to do a Galveston to PC one-way, with visiting a far away port first. They also can't do an all US itinerary unless they flagged in the US.
It would be easily solved stopping at Castaway Cay in both directions, or Castaway and Freeport. Or Mexico one direction, Castaway the other. Or if the politics ever get cleared up, Castaway and Cuba. I think it's a clever idea, I just wonder how many people would be interested in taking a 6 day cruise broken up into 2 choppy pieces. Let alone everyone has to be at WDW the same amount of time.
I've always thought the better idea was 4 days at WDW, a week or 10 days to transit the Panama Canal with a stop, and 2 days at DLR. Then they send the boat back the other way. I'm sure Disney could work with an airfare partner to make the two required one-way tickets work for those needing them.
Run it each way every 3-4 days so people can decide how long they want to stay at WDW. It would be ~6 days apart with only one ship on the route. Also, you'd have a lot of people fly one way and take DCL the other way. You'd also pick up some cruisers just taking it round trip without going to WDW.
It would be easily solved stopping at Castaway Cay in both directions, or Castaway and Freeport. Or Mexico one direction, Castaway the other. Or if the politics ever get cleared up, Castaway and Cuba. I think it's a clever idea, I just wonder how many people would be interested in taking a 6 day cruise broken up into 2 choppy pieces. Let alone everyone has to be at WDW the same amount of time.
I've always thought the better idea was 4 days at WDW, a week or 10 days to transit the Panama Canal with a stop, and 2 days at DLR. Then they send the boat back the other way. I'm sure Disney could work with an airfare partner to make the two required one-way tickets work for those needing them.
That would only clear the all US ports requirement. To do a one-way between US ports you have to visit a "Distant" foreign port. The only islands in the Caribbean that meet that requirement are the ABC islands (Aruba, Bonaire and Curacao). That is why almost all Eastern US repo cruises hit the ABC islands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_Vessel_Services_Act_of_1886
It would be easily solved stopping at Castaway Cay in both directions, or Castaway and Freeport. Or Mexico one direction, Castaway the other. Or if the politics ever get cleared up, Castaway and Cuba. I think it's a clever idea, I just wonder how many people would be interested in taking a 6 day cruise broken up into 2 choppy pieces. Let alone everyone has to be at WDW the same amount of time.
I've always thought the better idea was 4 days at WDW, a week or 10 days to transit the Panama Canal with a stop, and 2 days at DLR. Then they send the boat back the other way. I'm sure Disney could work with an airfare partner to make the two required one-way tickets work for those needing them.
Castaway cay twice? I looked at shipping lane maps and had no idea you pretty much have to have to sail south to the Mexico border before turning east to clear all the oil rigs.
A sidenote to this, is that Viking Cruise Lines wants to start river cruising on the Mississippi. They have to have their type of boats built I the US. They can't find anyone that can that can build it close to the cost they need on this side of the pond.
Huh. Didn't know the distant part. Nice to learn something new. Thanks!
A sidenote to this, is that Viking Cruise Lines wants to start river cruising on the Mississippi. They have to have their type of boats built I the US. They can't find anyone that can that can build it close to the cost they need on this side of the pond.