So his job is somehow easier because he was the one who was kicked? Your other posts seem to indicate that you're blaming the victim here. Including boycotting any show that he writes. As a Co-Executive Producer I imagine he has input in every episode. I still can't imagine why the end result of kicking a co-worker should end any way but termination.
I didn't say his job is easier. He is probably PLEASED today that Gibson got fired.
I saw this info on the writer yesterday on TMZ. The writer isn't some mild, gentle, dweeby, Beta male. He is trained as a boxer and martial artist.
http://www.tmz.com/2016/08/11/thomas-gibson-writer-kicked-criminal-minds-suspended-fight/
Thomas Gibson The Writer Kicked is an Aggressive Badass
8/11/2016 10:45 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
EXCLUSIVE
The writer
Thomas Gibson kicked on the "
Criminal Minds" set is anything but a nerd ... he's a boxer/martial artist with a super aggressive attitude -- sources connected to Gibson tell TMZ.
Virgil Williams is the writer/co-executive producer who got into it with Gibson when the argument escalated to the point the actor kicked him. But our Gibson sources say Williams escalated the verbal argument by "making a move" toward Gibson in a highly aggressive manner. They say
Gibson's kick was more a reaction to the perceived threat than an aggressive move.
So we don't really know what happened between them
or who started it. All we know is he has worked closely with Thomas Gibson before as Gibson directed two of his episodes. Gibson was directing that episode also. So they had an ongoing work relationship which we don't know anything about. And we know he got kicked.
As Missy said, the person who throws the first punch gets fired. It's also hard to prove self defense in a court of law, when one strikes first. I used to assistant teach a self defense course. Do a DIS search, I mentioned it a few times years ago. Once, while teaching, the teacher had to stop a match as the student hit first. It didn't matter if she was being menaced and threatened and followed by the assailant. That part would be hard to prove in court as she hit first. She was made to re-do the match and wait till the assailant stuck first. And boy, did he take his time, baiting and menacing her, trying to get her to hit first again.
We don't fully know what happened between Gibson & Williams and how much Williams may have contributed to the altercation
too. They probably BOTH could have behaved better. IF Williams "escalated the verbal argument by 'making a move' toward Gibson in a highly aggressive manner," then as far as I'm concerned he should be fired TOO. Not just the one who hit first. That shouldn't be tolerated in the work place either. So, no, I'm not going to support him, until we hear what fully, really happened. If it turns out that Gibson is drinking again, and he seems to be an angry drunk, and the kick was totally unprovoked, then yes, I will be supportive of Williams.