Interesting to note is the tone of their repsective posts. Nathan seems to be kind and helpful and welcoming. Amanda seems to be angry and defensive.
ETA: I googled it. It was Amanda's husband that said they carry $35,000 in insurance for JUST the stockpile. That's not somebody that does a good deal of donating. How much would that extra coverage cost compared to to the savings?
I do think Amanda has issues.
By regarding The $35K insurance. Let's pretend she got her stockpile at a 75% savings. That means she spent no more than $8750 for what is in there. Let us assume it is 2 years of stockpile. That is less $400/mo avg for groceries.
Now let us assume their house burns down tomorrow. They lost $35,000 worn of food, health and beauty aids and cleaning supplies.
Say they have a power outage over the summer for several days and it ruins their fridge and freezer full of food? That could be Hundreds in there alone.
We have food spoilage on our insurance for something like that.
Also--what they have is likely a rider. On our insurN e that is necessary for anything of value. No insurer is likely going to write a check for $35,000 retail of groceries. That (to them) is no different than you mentioning you lost a $35,000 work of art or diamond ring or whatever. Retail grocery prices prevail, so the replacement value is insured even though they did not spend that much getting the items.
That being said--it is indeed a huge stockpile. It does boggle my mind. And I do realize she had enough TP for decades. I was beig kind with the 2 year estimate.
We are a family of 6, though one kid is still an infant. Our stockpile is still small---but it is lasting a while. I don't get how they figure they require as much as they do for a year.
Least coupon lady had. One year stockpile did her family and it took up much less room (perimeter of her 2 car garage) than the couples. That confuses me.