jsivigny
Earning My Ears
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2010
- Messages
- 47
As noted, there are many variables and different ways to look at this issue. IMO, one should look at it as a stand alone financial issue to get a feel for the overall risks and costs though I'm sure we all realize there's more to it than that such as the investment in family. As for the questions above, one should seriously consider the dues. There is a difference in value to many between say SSR and BLT due to the 11 month window's and the difference in expiration, how much then becomes the issue and is it worth the difference to YOU. Here are a few principles I feel one should consider or at least that I would go by.
Anyway, my list (I'll likely think of others) to get you some additional food for thought. I realize these criteria mean that many here would not have bought DVC.
- I would not finance, no matter what.
- I would not buy owing other debts beyond a reasonable fixed rate mortgage (cars, CC, etc) that was no more than 50-70% of the current home value.
- DVC would need to represent a savings over what I'd spend for similar options and/or a significant upgrade for the same price to the tune of at least a 20% savings taking all reasonable discounts and/or increases into account AND taking into account the time value of the up front money.
- I feel comparing to rack rates is a fools comparison and doubly so using DVC rack rates UNLESS one would routinely pay cash for DVC or suites anyway.
- I would ONLY buy enough points to use at DVC, possibly with a mild cushion of 10-20% depending on specifics. For example, if you're looking at a week in a studio during off season or 5 days avoiding weekends, I'd definitely want a moderate cushion. Not so much if my focus is a week in a 2 BR during Magic or Premier season where you likely don't need a cushion at all.
- Buying to use for exchange options is an extremely poor and risky choice.
- SSR and possibly extended OKW contracts represent the best value at the present time (price vs RTU length and on property).
- BLT vs other dues differential will not last, at least to the degree that it currently is.
- HH & VB are poor choices in spite of the price differentials due to the lack of on property 11 month options, higher dues (esp VB) and risks to those resorts due to mother nature. However, there comes a price difference where the risks are worth it.
- I consider where I want to stay most trips but unless one will stay at a given location around 80% of the time OR one must routinely have a very difficult option (3 BR, concierge, BWV standard, AKV value, etc) it's likely best to buy the least that you're comfortable with which generally is the cheapest WDW option assuming mostly for WDW.
- DVC needs to pay for itself within NO MORE THAN 20 years taking into account reasonable worst case scenarios. Not the bogus calculations ignoring the time value of money and assuming inflation adjusted rack rates.
I was going to post, read this and decided that I couldn't have said it any better.