DisneyMomOK
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
- Messages
- 3,242
We still have this Ronald Reagan:
![]()
There is nothing more impressive!
We still have this Ronald Reagan:
![]()
SD - I am sorry to hear about all that. Good grief! But it is a good thing you kept persisting....I would have been too intimidated. I'll keep praying...
How could I have forgotten PB! Not to mention the Williams Sonoma outlet next door [that is where I can really spend some money].
Hey, TL - thanks for the ribs recommendations. I'm a pulled pork girl myself so I don't know much about ribs.
And, more about old movies, TCM is showing "The Great Escape" right now.young James Garner in a turtleneck
![]()
![]()
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, RONNIE!
![]()
We miss you, we really really really miss you...
Hey, Lib's! We got the message: you're stalking Wonder.
She might be able to report you for that.
OK. So, they want to put us in debt to create new jobs. BUT, that's a short-term solution. If our economy is still tanked - and putting us further in debt vs. stimulating the economy to actually drive us out of the recession - which is the only thing this bill will do - will not create the money to keep these jobs long-term. Eventually there will have to be mass lay-offs once again when the companies run out of the hand-out from the Gov. for the created job positions.
Heads up PR its not alllll about you. One comment, out of everything I said in that post was about you but none of it was directed towards you. But, since you brought it up, and everything I posted apparently hit a nerve, now Ill tell you: stop lurking. Oh, wait, you cant help yourself. Eh, then you and your friends need to learn to deal with it if youre going to lurk over here. I disagree with 99.99999% of the stuff on your thread and Ive seen several of you post things that I find very vile; but I dont invade your thread. I just deal with it. Like a big girl.
now about that hanging. You want Obama hung? Because when did I ever say that I wanted Obama hung? I was just agreeing that Obama is showing more sympathy towards terrorist right now with how hes handling Gitmo and giving the prisoners American rights they dont deserve. Youre the one brining up hanging.
But, seriously, these are prisoners of war not American citizens. The dont get any citizen rights from our country anymore than any of our US Soldiers ever captured and taken as prisoner overseas get from the countries that capture them. Thats why there are military courts. But you and your Obama want these men brought on US soil and given American rights. They dont deserve American rights. Theyve tried to kill us; once free theyll still try to kill us. You too. Voting for Obama doesnt give you a free pass from not getting killed by a terrorist that hates America. They hate Obama too. Every one of them that has been released has returned to a terrorist cell that wants us dead.
Now Ill have to worry about them being my neighbor. Now Ill have to worry about them having legal rights to live on US soil as they continue to plot and attempt to destroy this country. Because if theyre brought on US soil, and if they are given citizens rights for a trial, and if my taxpayer money goes to pay for the trail and if they get off on a technicality or whatever they will have legal right to stay in the US if their country will not accept them back.
You may want to rethink moving back to the United States now that Bush is out of the White House. (Or are you staying in PR and you consider that the US?) Bush made this country safe. You can hate him all you darn well want; but he kept this country safe. Obama, in two weeks, is already making this country vulnerable for attack again. Mark my words; there will be another terrorist attack on US soil under an Obama reign because Obama is making it easy for one to occur.
Now my post here; it not open for a debate. You invaded a click thread and not one of the debate threads on the main CB. Take it out onto the main CB and if I feel like arguing with you; I'll find you.
Like the sig.
![]()
I'm sorry for your husband.
yeah...a mite sounds about right. the bee thing is pretty serious.
we're also in yet another year of drought here, and things are getting pretty tough. i even saw on the news that people are starting to use divining rods to find underground water sources.![]()
Teresa, that Minnie is adorable!
And, another reason to celebrate....
Move over Detroit and Chicago, my hometown was just given the dubious honor of being the second most miserable [yes, Forbes used that word] place to live in the US. The most miserable? Stockton, CA....
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/06/mo...usiness-washington_0206_miserable_cities.html
Forbes used factors such as crime, corruption, tax rate, pollution, sports teams[?], and weather [????]...
Ironically that the likes of a Daley, Blago, and Granholm weren't enough to unseat good ole Memphis....
This will be exciting to our hockey fans -- the success of MI's pro teams was what propelled them [Flint and Detroit] to a respectable 6 and 7 in the miserable factor. Chicago, alas, is only 3rd.
Sooooo, this great news allows me bragging rights to one-up anybody who complains about their own city, at least until Forbes comes out with another list next year.
And, it is interesting -- government corruption and taxation - the two big factors in determining misery....from these first two weeks, it sounds as if we have a good long four years of just that coming up....![]()
Thanks! She is cute, isn't she?
We had a thread on that. It got pretty nasty.glenn was talking about that man whose daughter disappeared in mexico...he interviewed the guy, but it seemed as though he was crying because the law(or whoever) has given up. glenn promised that his network would not give up. her father, who glenn interviewed, thinks she was given as a "gift" to a drug cartel. heinous.
but we do have
![]()


Hey, Elvis belongs to everybody.![]()
![]()

It wasn't work-related. It was something else. Though work was a bit
, but I love it. I'll just remember to start bringing a jacket on days when I work stocking the cooler.
Hi all, happy Saturday. Bit of an update on the $4,000 test front...
After speaking with additional folks in these offices, something is rotten in Denmark IMO. My mom talked to a person in the company itself about the cost, and they're who got the financial info from her. I thought it was to make sure she could pay since insurance likely would not cover it. Remember also I found that odd because we have good insurance. It was explained as they don't think it's necessary. Well, I'm a questioner by nature and something didn't seem right to me. So, some further chatting and we find out that the financial info was asked for because if insurance won't pay, as long as our household total income was under a certain number and we had a house payment, the company would eat the entire $4,000 cost for the test. And that's when I knew something was not quite right here. What company just says "If your insurance doesn't pay, we won't make you pay. We'll eat the cost!" A company is going to absorb a $4,000 bill like that? Hmm. Being a Psych. major in college myself, my mind immediately turned to "They want it for research purposes."
Well, turns out this is the only lab in the entire COUNTRY that does this specific test. It's still very new and, ding ding ding, We have a winner!, they eat the cost because they want as much data as they can get while they try this new test out.So I don't particularly find comfort in the fact that whether or not she gets chemo will be based on the results of a test NO ONE ELSE in the U.S. does that's still in the "new" stages. Apparently this chemo doctor is in with this lab company on this new testing for research purposes, so he recommends most of his patients have this test done because he's excited about its promise.
I'm just very bothered by this. If it's that new, and this lab in this city is the only one that does that test, and a handful of doctors in this area (possibly only him) are the only ones who use it, who's to say these results will mean anything or even be accurate? Again, they already knew the cause, already knew the % chance of it coming back, and yet the chemo decision will be made based on this data? From this new test no one else in the country does?
I ain't happy. At all.![]()
I said a prayer, and will continue to do so.![]()
Prayer said.![]()
Prayer said.![]()
everyone.
Prayers being said.
![]()
Debbie, you forgot that wonderful mayor of yours....![]()
I love St. Jude. Several of my wish kids have been there and it is really impressive.
Mphs does have a ton of great places to eat, too.
As for entertainment, we still like the zoo and the Red Birds. Everyone should go to Graceland at least once, don't you think?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
At least we'll be rid of her here.
I need a valium. Where can I get a valium? Anyone got one? Gah.

I have always worried that limited water resources will be a crisis for which there is no easy solution.
Hi all, happy Saturday. Bit of an update on the $4,000 test front...
After speaking with additional folks in these offices, something is rotten in Denmark IMO. My mom talked to a person in the company itself about the cost, and they're who got the financial info from her. I thought it was to make sure she could pay since insurance likely would not cover it. Remember also I found that odd because we have good insurance. It was explained as they don't think it's necessary. Well, I'm a questioner by nature and something didn't seem right to me. So, some further chatting and we find out that the financial info was asked for because if insurance won't pay, as long as our household total income was under a certain number and we had a house payment, the company would eat the entire $4,000 cost for the test. And that's when I knew something was not quite right here. What company just says "If your insurance doesn't pay, we won't make you pay. We'll eat the cost!" A company is going to absorb a $4,000 bill like that? Hmm. Being a Psych. major in college myself, my mind immediately turned to "They want it for research purposes."
Well, turns out this is the only lab in the entire COUNTRY that does this specific test. It's still very new and, ding ding ding, We have a winner!, they eat the cost because they want as much data as they can get while they try this new test out.So I don't particularly find comfort in the fact that whether or not she gets chemo will be based on the results of a test NO ONE ELSE in the U.S. does that's still in the "new" stages. Apparently this chemo doctor is in with this lab company on this new testing for research purposes, so he recommends most of his patients have this test done because he's excited about its promise.
I'm just very bothered by this. If it's that new, and this lab in this city is the only one that does that test, and a handful of doctors in this area (possibly only him) are the only ones who use it, who's to say these results will mean anything or even be accurate? Again, they already knew the cause, already knew the % chance of it coming back, and yet the chemo decision will be made based on this data? From this new test no one else in the country does?
I ain't happy. At all.![]()
I said a prayer, and will continue to do so.![]()
Prayer said.![]()
Prayer said.![]()
everyone.
Prayers being said.
![]()
Debbie, you forgot that wonderful mayor of yours....![]()
I love St. Jude. Several of my wish kids have been there and it is really impressive.
Mphs does have a ton of great places to eat, too.
As for entertainment, we still like the zoo and the Red Birds. Everyone should go to Graceland at least once, don't you think?
SD, from my perspective, and this is coming from someone with a rare disease who fights every day for better and more accurate tests for diagnosis...
Don't discount new tests. Give it a shot. Even if it is for research purposes. Someone had to test all the tests that we have nowadays, a long time ago, even things as simple as a blood count were unreliable tests.
Several of my tests are only processed at one lab in the country and only a handful of doctors use, but that's just protocol for my disease.
I honestly would give the whole left side of my body to be involved in something like that for my disease. New things come out everyday and it just may be the thing that saves your mom's life.
But remember, this is coming from someone who's diagnosis is going to take a year + to get and is very rare (I knew I was special, just never knew how special...)