But, wasn't it a practice game? If that is the case, then they wouldn't have a place for another coach to take those kids to and sometimes watching other kids playing IS the teaching technique being used.
I don't think its the sign of a bad coach. Every kid is not going to play every position. There may be 2 or even 3 first basemen. If the play being practiced is involving first base then those kids need to be involved in the practice along with the first string other players--but not every kid who plays 3rd base.
Sorry this is long.
Seriously your 7 year old team right out of tee-ball has 2 or 3 first baseman and they don't play any other position? How many children are on the roster?
I think we are speaking of 2 different things...I think. One I am speaking strictly of young children U8 and even U10 to some extent. At 9 and 10 they are starting to get more focused and more mature and are starting to understand more of the game.
Also what a practice game is seems to mean something different to me than to you, but I am not sure.
If its a practice game where there is an umpire or a coach that is playing as an ump against another different team, I would call that a scrimmage.
With a paid umpire during a scrimmage, I would think most game rules would be applied with some changes probably for more position changes to try things out.
If its a coach as an ump, then its even more free form but again if its considered a scrimmage then game rules apply.
In both situations the scorecard maybe kept. But the score may or may not be offically recorded with the league. And although I think all kids should get a chance to play, if their rules says they don't have to, then they don't have to.
If its a game situational practice with just the 1 team then its just that; a practice. One that focus's on game situations.
And if its a game situtional drill targeted for 1st base and all the other 1st string players are playing plus the other 2 or 3 first baseman umm what are the other players doing? They are 7 years old? They are goofing off for a good portion of the drill. Maybe not running around but certaintly not focused on the the drill for the whole time.
And that 1 drill lasted an hour or more? They didn't change the drill to focus on the 2nd baseman at any time? or the 3rd baseman? See if they did that, then 1 kid wouldn't be sitting on the bench for an hour during practice. He may sit sometimes but not an hour.
And if the coach does want to focus on the 1st baseman for the whole hour, you wouldn't expect the coach to rotate the second string team players in for 15 minutes? It is a team sport, and the second string players are a part of team. And when the first string players aren't there for whatever reason that second string player needs to peform too. Line them up, first string players in front, second string in back and make 10 plays and then switch or some other varient to get them all playing.
Children will never improve game play unless they play in games or game situations and at 7 they are all still learning the game situations. He can't learn simply by observing, it simply is not the same. Its easy to say this is what he should have done but doing it is a whole different matter.
I agree that watching a situational drill can be used as a teaching method but I don't think it works well for young children. It works reasonably well for adults and older children that have the necessary maturity to follow along, have the fielding skills and throwing skills etc, but I can't imagine this working well for 7 year olds. They don't have all the skills neccessary. They may have some but not all. They especially lack maturity and focus. So I don't think watching the drill isn't the best teaching method for anyone but especially not young children.