Celebrity Family Fued

DISNEY1975

DIS Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2008
Please tell me there are other families out there who sat their kids in front of the TV last night to watch Celebrity Family Feud, thinking it would be something fun to watch as a family.

Ughhhhh....Im disgusted.
 
Um....did not watch but had to Google it. WTH? The question was just plain stupid!!! :rolleyes:

Family Feud
is an endless, magical, wonderful source of comedy, so the celebrity version of the show has the potential to be so much more. And during its season premiere Sunday night it did NOT disappoint.

In a question for Anthony Anderson’s mother, Steve Harvey got to say the following sentence on television:

“Name something a nude magician pulls a rabbit out of?”

Wait, what?! Yes, that was a 100% legitimate question on this “family” program as Anthony Anderson would remind his mother after her response was “his nuts.” Everyone was laughing at her answer but seriously, what was she supposed to say instead? As she pointed out, he’s naked. Nobody asked the more important question: Why do we live in a world where nude magicians are apparently prevalent enough to be a question on Family Feud?
 
Family Feud always asks loaded questions. I have told my teenager who enjoys it, that he cannot watch the show when his little sister is awake. He had it on and she started repeating somethings a preschooler shouldn't say.

It's not really family programming.
 
Totally agree! It has been this way from the very beginning of the show's existence.

I used to watch as a child (Im sure Im order than you) and the questions were NOTHING like that. They were questions like, name an Olympic Sport, What is something you would find in your living room etc....

I was excited to see this show air in prime time. Sunday night, 8pm, ABC, right after Americas Funniest Videos.

First question:
Name something a naked magician would pull a rabbit out of
First answer:
His ***.

Then his nuts was an answer that was wrong and other stuff NOT appropriate for a child to be watching.

Second question was something about what an ex wife would not want her ex husband buying right after the divorce...house, car boat. OK, we're doing OK now. NOT...Lola the street Ho was on the board.

Next question:
100 men surveyed...name an animal better endowed than you are.
Answers: Hung like a horse, some comment that went over a minute about a Walrus' ***** and a couple more.

Next game even had a nice question: something like name something you wouldnt want to accidentally put in the collection basket at church.
Answers...too much money, a credit card, your wallet. All good answers, but the # 1 answer that took about 4 people to get to was condoms.

And they show went on and on and on with this filth.

ABC owes all parents an apology. They should have thrown something up there stating "May not be appropriate for children" It was really terrible that they would bill this as a family show.
 
I just posted above and even this site had the decency to bleep out my words. THANK YOU DISBOARDS :love:
 
I would have assumed it wasn't appropriate for kids, just the way it's always been. For the PP saying the questions were name an Olympic sport.. Those were the fast money questions at the end. The shows always been raunchy. That one host used to kiss all the ladies for pete sakes.
 
I actually like Steve Harvey as a comedian and even his talk show is O.K. at times, but that Family Feud show last night was ridiculous. There is no place for those questions and answers on prime time television.
 
Richard Dawson was the kissing host back in the day, but the questions were not as suggestive as they are now. Even the non celebrity version that is on in my area (7pm-730pm & 730pm-8pm) has suggestive inuendo bounced around. Agree it's now anything little kids should watch but what really gets me is the fact that Steve Harvey claims to be a Christian. I would think he would set a better example.
 
Richard Dawson was the kissing host back in the day, but the questions were not as suggestive as they are now. Even the non celebrity version that is on in my area (7pm-730pm & 730pm-8pm) has suggestive inuendo bounced around. Agree it's now anything little kids should watch but what really gets me is the fact that Steve Harvey claims to be a Christian. I would think he would set a better example.


Oh boooooy

*off to find the eyes that rolled right out of her head*
 
I used to watch as a child (Im sure Im order than you) and the questions were NOTHING like that. They were questions like, name an Olympic Sport, What is something you would find in your living room etc....

I was excited to see this show air in prime time. Sunday night, 8pm, ABC, right after Americas Funniest Videos.

First question:
Name something a naked magician would pull a rabbit out of
First answer:
His ***.

Then his nuts was an answer that was wrong and other stuff NOT appropriate for a child to be watching.

Second question was something about what an ex wife would not want her ex husband buying right after the divorce...house, car boat. OK, we're doing OK now. NOT...Lola the street Ho was on the board.

Next question:
100 men surveyed...name an animal better endowed than you are.
Answers: Hung like a horse, some comment that went over a minute about a Walrus' ***** and a couple more.

Next game even had a nice question: something like name something you wouldnt want to accidentally put in the collection basket at church.
Answers...too much money, a credit card, your wallet. All good answers, but the # 1 answer that took about 4 people to get to was condoms.

And they show went on and on and on with this filth.

ABC owes all parents an apology. They should have thrown something up there stating "May not be appropriate for children" It was really terrible that they would bill this as a family show.
Where was this promoted as a family show? The only commercials I saw for the show were during episodes of black-ish, which is definitely not an appropriate show for young kids. I only watch a few shows on ABC, but I don't recall any shows having a disclaimer like that. Parents are responsible for previewing shows before letting young kids watch them. ABC doesn't owe anyone an apology. Lol
 
No, Family Feud was NOT always this risqué. Maybe occasionally there would be some mild innuendo, whether intentional or not, but nothing close to what was apparently shown last night. However I've noticed even from watching reruns of the "daytime" Steve Harvey version on GSN that there are a lot more "loaded" questions that are not even remotely family friendly compared to the good ol' days.
 
I would have assumed it wasn't appropriate for kids, just the way it's always been. For the PP saying the questions were name an Olympic sport.. Those were the fast money questions at the end. The shows always been raunchy. That one host used to kiss all the ladies for pete sakes.

I assumed it would be somewhat family friendly because of the time slot.
 
No, Family Feud was NOT always this risqué. Maybe occasionally there would be some mild innuendo, whether intentional or not, but nothing close to what was apparently shown last night. However I've noticed even from watching reruns of the "daytime" Steve Harvey version on GSN that there are a lot more "loaded" questions that are not even remotely family friendly compared to the good ol' days.
You have to compare what was considered risqué at the time for TV back in the day and now. Just as with the Newlywed game back when it was on tv. Innuendo has always been a part of the show, but times have changed and so have the words used. I totally agree that it was over the top and unnecessary, but to think an apology from ABC is warranted when A) no one was forced to watch, and B) everyone had the ability to turn the channel once the first question revealed the direction the show was going, is just silly.
 
In the late 80s/early 90s when I was a kid, Ray Combs was the host. Family Feud was advertised as a prime time family show, and I distinctly remember the commercials showed the whole family watching and playing along including young children. Sometimes the questions and answers might have gone a little "south", but nothing so blatantly inappropriate (not even for "those days") that you would not let your kids watch it. The Newlywed Game however, I don't think that was ever intended for the whole family to watch since it was all about couples and marital relationships.

I don't think ABC owes anyone an apology for it, they can do whatever they want. I was just pointing out the differences between then and now.
 
lola the street ho? come on. I am no prude, but if that is what they have to come up with to make people watch the celebrity version, I will stick to the celebrity version of jeopardy.
 
Where was this promoted as a family show? The only commercials I saw for the show were during episodes of black-ish, which is definitely not an appropriate show for young kids. I only watch a few shows on ABC, but I don't recall any shows having a disclaimer like that. Parents are responsible for previewing shows before letting young kids watch them. ABC doesn't owe anyone an apology. Lol

It was advertised all during the NBA playoffs. Also, on the news where I live as a Patriots player and family are suppose to be on an upcoming episode.

Also... below is another reason why I thought it was family programming..... 8pm Sunday night


The Children’s Television Act specifically regulated children’s television.[3]

Safe Harbor Hours
The term "safe harbor" refers to the hours during which broadcasters may transmit material deemed indecent for children. This "safe harbor", enforced by the Federal Communications Commission, extends—legally—from 10 PM to 6 AM and was established by the US Supreme Court case FCC v. Pacifica.[4] This "safe harbor" is based on evidence that children 17 years of age and under are less likely to be in the audience during these hours. Sexual content and foul language are lawfully channeled to times of the day when children are less likely to be in the broadcast audience. Paradoxically according to some[citation needed], viewing televised violence is perceived to have a more harmful effect on children than fleeting expletives or brief nudity. With respect to violent program content, the research suggests that younger children are most at risk, possibly requiring a different conclusion as to the ages of children to be protected, the appropriate "safe harbor" hours.[5][6]

The Law

What are the statutes and rules regarding the broadcast of obscene, indecent, and profane programming? Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1464, prohibits the utterance of any obscene, indecent or profane language by means of radio communication. Consistent with a subsequent statute and court case, the Commission's rules prohibit the broadcast of indecent material during the period of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. FCC decisions also prohibit the broadcast of profane material between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Civil enforcement of these requirements rests with the FCC, and is an important part of the FCC's overall responsibilities. At the same time, the FCC must be mindful of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 326 of the Communications Act, which prohibit the FCC from censoring program material, or interfering with broadcasters' free speech rights.

What makes material obscene? Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and broadcasters are prohibited, by statute and regulation, from airing obscene programming at any time. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, to be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test: (1) an average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest (i.e., material having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts); (2) the material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law; and (3) the material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. The Supreme Court has indicated that this test is designed to cover hard-core pornography.

What makes material indecent? Indecent material contains sexual or excretory material that does not rise to the level of obscenity. For this reason, the courts have held that indecent material is protected by the First Amendment and cannot be banned entirely. It may, however, be restricted to avoid its broadcast during times of the day when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience. The FCC has determined, with the approval of the courts, that there is a reasonable risk that children will be in the audience from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., local time. Therefore, the FCC prohibits station licensees from broadcasting indecent material during that period.

Material is indecent if, in context, it depicts or describes sexual or excretory organs or activities in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium. In each case, the FCC must determine whether the material describes or depicts sexual or excretory organs or activities and, if so, whether the material is patently offensive.

In our assessment of whether material is patently offensive, context is critical. The FCC looks at three primary factors when analyzing broadcast material: (1) whether the description or depiction is explicit or graphic; (2) whether the material dwells on or repeats at length descriptions or depictions of sexual or excretory organs; and (3) whether the material appears to pander or is used to titillate or shock. No single factor is determinative. The FCC weighs and balances these factors because each case presents its own mix of these, and possibly other, factors.

What makes material profane? Profane language includes those words that are so highly offensive that their mere utterance in the context presented may, in legal terms, amount to a nuisance. In its Golden Globe Awards Order the FCC warned broadcasters that, depending on the context, it would consider the F-Word and those words (or variants thereof) that are as highly offensive as the F-Word to be profane language that cannot be broadcast between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

What is the safe harbor? The safe harbor refers to the time period between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., local time. During this time period, a station may air indecent and/or profane material. In contrast, there is no safe harbor for the broadcast of obscene material. Obscene material is entitled to no First Amendment protection, and may not be broadcast at any time.
 
















GET A DISNEY VACATION QUOTE


Our Dreams Unlimited Travel Agents will assist you in booking the perfect Disney getaway, all at no extra cost to you. Get the most out of your vacation by letting us assist you with dining and park reservations, provide expert advice, answer any questions, and continuously search for discounts to ensure you get the best deal possible.

CLICK HERE




facebook twitter
Top