pooh'smate
Stuck in the Middle
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 4,579
Can always count on you for info! TY!
But, the body was out in the woods, and there had been a ton of water at some time. Obviously, parts of her body (bones) were moved by animals...why is it so unbelievable that the skull would move, by an animal, or water movement? BUT...when her body was found, didn't whoever called it in say that someone might have kicked the skull? That makes me wonder if they're providing an explanation before the question has really been asked, KWIM?
If the area where the skull was found was under water for a while isn't it possible it could have "moved" that way. And who isn't to say some animal ran over it or by and kicked it or knocked it so it moved then. Isn't it possible that since it was in the elements for some time that there could be sediment in several places depending on how long it laid a certain way.![]()
I see we were thinking along the same lines.
Also why does the defense keep asking if they cut the skull? Was the skull cut or sawed into at some point?