Casey Anthony Civil Trials Discussion

Very interesting, thanks for sharing!
Ditto! Thanks! I'm at the hairdresser, processing. :teeth: Enjoyed the update. Would love to be at that conference in person! Bet Baez isn't there because he'd rather face wishy washy media like BW than his fellow bar members. Wonder what Cheney Mason has to say.
 
#lindadraneburdick most difficult thing for me was being a single mom and away from my third grade daughter. (She got emotional discussing).

#CaseyAnthony Prosecutors have concluded to applause-Many stood.

#cheneymason now answering questions. Mason: we would not allow a rush to judgement. #CaseyAnthony.

Jeff Ashton says going to Pinellas county to pick jury wasn't far enough. He's also not sure if the moon would have impartial jury#Casey

#cheneymason pretrial release of discovery evidence: "this case took as long as it did because of media." First is not only amendment.

#cheneymason #CaseyAnthony jury reversed the media's conviction of Casey Anthony.

Mason says pre-trial evidence should not be available to public #caseyanthonytrial
 
#cheneymason calls it the "Nancy Disgrace show." Chastised other lawyers who quit and "left us in a lurch." #CaseyAnthony.

#cheneymason #josebaez would not quit." He walked the walk that's for sure." #CaseyAnthony.

Mason worked pro Bono on #caseyanthonytrial. He says he lost out on $600,000

Orange county bar meeting praising judge Belvin Perry for work on #caseyanthonytrial

#cheneymason People threatened to kill me and my family thanks to ignorant pundits on tv. "That's why #CaseyAnthony is in hiding."



Ok , Im outta here to head home.. Ill post more later , if there is more!
 

Ditto! Thanks! I'm at the hairdresser, processing. :teeth: Enjoyed the update. Would love to be at that conference in person! Bet Baez isn't there because he'd rather face wishy washy media like BW than his fellow bar members. Wonder what Cheney Mason has to say.

I'm imagining a computer "processing, processing...." :rotfl:

You should also be cleaning out your PMs. :rolleyes1



* Jovi - you rock! Thanks for sharing.

It's very interesting. This case could actually lead to some changes in procedure. Some good can come from it. I still think there should be no such thing as an opening argument. It's just an opportunity for the lawyers to taint the jury, just like the media does. And we see how it worked in this case. :mad:
 
I'm imagining a computer "processing, processing...." :rotfl:

You should also be cleaning out your PMs. :rolleyes1


* Jovi - you rock! Thanks for sharing.

It's very interesting. This case could actually lead to some changes in procedure. Some good can come from it. I still think there should be no such thing as an opening argument. It's just an opportunity for the lawyers to taint the jury, just like the media does. And we see how it worked in this case. :mad:
I agree with ALL your statements! :blush:
 
All welcome!

Nothing really else was tweeted (is that the right word?) Just that Baez didn't even respond to the invite... whatever.

I , too hope some change can come from all this mess , or at least, that we learn from it!

Now, just waiting for Ashton's book. How awesome is it to see no decent publisher wants to go near a book by Casey!
 
I am pleased she nor Baez are making a dime. I cant wait for Ashtons book. Thanks for sharing.
 
Okay, not sure what to make of this, but in my email I got a notification that Cassey anthony was following me on twitter! :eek:
 
When I clicked on the facebook account it was there as well with her name and picture. I am just wondering if someone else had made this account.
 
Hey, anyone who hears from CA, invite her to join the thread! :teeth:

Casey Anthony takes Fifth 60 times in civil suit deposition

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/01/justice/florida-casey-anthony/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

(CNN) -- Attorneys representing Casey Anthony invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination 60 times during a deposition given in a civil suit against her, according to a transcript of the proceedings.

In addition, Anthony's attorney Charles Greene asserted he would also invoke the Fifth Amendment on her behalf if questioning delved into the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee.

Anthony, who was acquitted in July of murder charges in Caylee's death, is being sued in civil court by a woman named Zenaida Gonzalez.

When Caylee was reported missing in July 2008 -- a month after she was last seen -- Anthony maintained she had been kidnapped by her nanny, Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez.

Authorities were never able to find the nanny. But they did find Gonzalez, who claimed she never met Anthony or her daughter.

Gonzalez's attorneys claim, according to questions asked of Anthony in the October 8 deposition, that Gonzalez was questioned by the police in Caylee's disappearance, was kicked out of her apartment complex, lost her job and that she and her two daughters received death threats as a result of media attention in the case.

Anthony herself said little in the deposition, but did acknowledge she was aware she was being sued by Gonzalez.

She also said she has not spoken to her brother, Lee, in the past six months, and has not spoken to her parents, George and Cindy Anthony, since October 14, 2008.

However, Greene did not permit her to answer questions including whether she had ever met Gonzalez; whether a person named Zenaida was ever a nanny to Caylee; or whether defense attorney Jose Baez's assertion during Anthony's criminal trial, that Zenaida Gonzalez was one of Anthony's "imaginary friends," was true.

She also was not allowed to answer questions about whether she considered herself a good mother to Caylee; the last day she saw the 2-year-old alive; and whether she drowned in the Anthonys' pool in June 2008, as the defense claimed during Anthony's criminal trial.

Asked why he was invoking Anthony's right against self-incrimination, Greene said, according to the transcript, "I need not explain our factual basis other than to tell you that it could tend to incriminate and provide a link in the chain of evidence that could be used against (Anthony)."

Asked by Gonzalez's attorney John Morgan what pending criminal case that applies to, Greene said, "We made our objection and that's all I'm going to state."

Morgan told Greene he anticipates a hearing before a judge on a motion to compel Anthony to answer some of these questions. Greene said that taking it to a judge is "the best thing to do."

While Anthony was acquitted on murder charges in Caylee's death, she was convicted on four counts of lying to authorities investigating the child's disappearance. She was given credit for time already spent behind bars, however, and was released from jail July 17.

She has remained in seclusion since then, although a judge ruled she must serve a year of probation stemming from her 2010 conviction on check fraud charges. The transcript of the deposition notes that Anthony participated via videoconference from "an undisclosed location."

"I hope that you and your counsel understand that we did not ask questions that many people may have wished we did concerning your employment history then or now, where you live, where you stay," Morgan told Anthony as questioning wrapped up. "... We did this, this deposition, in pursuit of truth and not in pursuit of sensation."

Anthony has also been ordered to repay more than $217,000 to authorities for the costs of investigating Caylee's disappearance.
 
Asked why he was invoking Anthony's right against self-incrimination, Greene said, according to the transcript, "I need not explain our factual basis other than to tell you that it could tend to incriminate and provide a link in the chain of evidence that could be used against (Anthony)."



This is the part that confuses me. She was acquitted - she cannot be tried again. Why is she taking the 5th? Evidence that could be used against her how? In the civil trial? Then she might as well admit she's guilty and let that trial end.
 
This is the part that confuses me. She was acquitted - she cannot be tried again. Why is she taking the 5th? Evidence that could be used against her how? In the civil trial? Then she might as well admit she's guilty and let that trial end.

I'm confused by that too. The only thing I can think of would that maybe there are some federal charges that Casey could still be tried for and that's why her attorney wants her to keep quiet.
 
While Casey could shout it from the rooftops that she killed her daughter and not be charged again, I assume doing so would impact the outcome of the Zanny case.
 
I also think that Casey doesn't want the truth out there because she's hoping that someday, everyone is going to forget all about what they think of her, and then she can get on with her life. She thinks.
 
I also think that Casey doesn't want the truth out there because she's hoping that someday, everyone is going to forget all about what they think of her, and then she can get on with her life. She thinks.

Sure, I forget all the time which of my friends killed someone. Why just the other day I was having lunch with Charles Manson and OJ and asked, "Which one of you guys killed someone?" OJ said, "Not me!" and Charles just laughed and laughed.


Good times. :goodvibes


So I see her taking the fifth as not wanting to help the Zanny case - which to me is already a slam dunk. Casey has no money to give the woman, and no amount would make up for it.
 
Sure, I forget all the time which of my friends killed someone. Why just the other day I was having lunch with Charles Manson and OJ and asked, "Which one of you guys killed someone?" OJ said, "Not me!" and Charles just laughed and laughed.


Good times. :goodvibes


So I see her taking the fifth as not wanting to help the Zanny case - which to me is already a slam dunk. Casey has no money to give the woman, and no amount would make up for it.
Well, I kind of meant the general public. That she thinks that someday, this will blow over to the point where she can have a life and go out in public, and altho she can't be tried for murder again, she doesn't want to be giving out any "facts", whether there's the Zanny case or not. :confused3
 








Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom