bcla
On our rugged Eastern foothills.....
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2012
- Messages
- 25,760
Sounds kind of strange. Traditional DSL has gotten faster over the years, but it still isn't the greatest. It's basically trying to squeeze data through an inherently noisy connection. I had it for a while, and I dealt with slow speeds along with an ancient modem (it was paid for) that topped out at 2 Mbit/sec. The big advantage to traditional DSL was that it worked over traditional copper phone lines and basically you just needed a phone line. I had a setup for my folks, but they ended up getting VoIP thinking they would still have the line for Internet. Once their traditional phone line was disconnected, the DSL (EarthLink) was cancelled. They couldn't get AT&T to connect a "dry line", so they went with U-Verse internet.
That kind of DSL connection just plugged in the phone line to an Internet circuit. Sounds like they don't intend on adding any more locally (the waiting list). The speed depends on how long the line is. A longer line means more noise and slower speeds. Cable internet over coax doesn't have that issue.
U-Verse uses a DSL connection to a neighborhood box on a fiber network. They try to keep the length of the line really short. But they have to determine if it makes sense to have that box in a neighborhood. If it's not a very populated neighborhood, they won't do it.
That kind of DSL connection just plugged in the phone line to an Internet circuit. Sounds like they don't intend on adding any more locally (the waiting list). The speed depends on how long the line is. A longer line means more noise and slower speeds. Cable internet over coax doesn't have that issue.
U-Verse uses a DSL connection to a neighborhood box on a fiber network. They try to keep the length of the line really short. But they have to determine if it makes sense to have that box in a neighborhood. If it's not a very populated neighborhood, they won't do it.