Can it get any worse??? Britney Spears...

poor thing..she has had nothing but negative publicity lately...yes that is the most horrific outfit i have seen but thats her...that is what she likes..what she is comfortable in...there is no doubt she loves that little boy though..
 
I can't believe I'm going to comment Britney Spears? Then don't do it? Nope, I will do it anyway.

Yes. It is her good right to be overwhelmed by the baby and the new pregnancy (didn't know that, don't read the gossip magazines, am busy enough by reading the DIS). Many people are. Nevertheless, she has the money to do something about it. And NO, I don't mean getting rid of the unborn child :rolleyes:
I mean, she has the money to afford a nanny, a nurse, a housekeeper, heck, she's rich enough to afford hiring Mary Poppins!

No. It's no fun to be followed by paparazzi all day everyday. But how come you don't get to see that many pictures like that from catherine zeta jones? Gwyneth? Or so many other celebrities? Because the have some class and decency left!
If Britney would only stop to come out dressed like a sl*t and stop the drama of crying in front of the paparazzi, they would loose interest in her.
Get a stylist, get someone who will shop for you, get a babysit when you want to go out for lunch, stay inside if you feel depressed and need to cry, get a shrink, ...

I'm sorry for her and I'm not. It's not easy being a young mom, but she should also stop putting herself in the middle of the drama.
 
SandraVB79 said:
heck, she's rich enough to afford hiring Mary Poppins!
LOL! :thumbsup2

SandraVB79 said:
But how come you don't get to see that many pictures like that from catherine zeta jones? Gwyneth? Or so many other celebrities? Because the have some class and decency left!
I don't know if I agree with this, my first thought is that those pics just wouldn't generate the income, interest and gossip that the britney pics do. :confused3
 
Obi-Wan Pinobi said:
That's weird. When I right click on it, I don't see photoshop mentioned anywhere in the properties :confused3

Honestly? I think she brings the attention on herself and likes it. I think she's playing the media and keeping them interested in her until she is ready to get back into singing. They say there is no bad publicity, and lets face it, she's not fading into the background at all so it's working like a charm. If she truly wanted to be able to get out without being embarrassed in public by paparazzi she would be able to find a way. Other famous mothers like Catharine Zeta Jones, Denise Richards, Brooke Shields, Gwenyth Paltrow - they all seem to be able to go out in public with their children without creating a media circus out of the event.
DING DING DING DING! We have a winner! :thumbsup2
 

I don't know if I agree with this, my first thought is that those pics just wouldn't generate the income, interest and gossip that the britney pics do.

I have NEVER seen a picture of Catherine wearing something out of the sl*ts-r-us collection Britney seems to like.
Heck, even her costumes in Chicago were covering up more than that!!
 
I didn't sift through the pages of responses to find if anyone else made note of this. The picture was actually taken after she tripped and nearly dropped the baby. There's a horrendous picture the papparazi (or however you spell it!) got with his arms curled into his chest and his spine bent straight back. She was wearing a ground-sweeping skirt and platforms when it all happened.

There's a a series of 3 pictures in this week's US Weekly that shows her leaving with him, nearly dropping him, and then in this smae restaurant (which I think was a McD's) looking at the camera crying.

I feel sorry for her at this point. I do believe she's trying her best, but it's incredibly difficult living life under a microscope. And it's not as though the papparazi, her husband, or the media outlets are making things any easier on her. Yes, when you become famous, this is part of the deal, but where do you draw the line and say enough is enough?
 
Obi-Wan Pinobi said:
Other famous mothers like Catharine Zeta Jones, Denise Richards, Brooke Shields, Gwenyth Paltrow - they all seem to be able to go out in public with their children without creating a media circus out of the event.
I don't know if Denise Richards is a good example right now! What with all that's surrounding her and Richie Sambora, they are trailing her, too. The other one that turns up regularly in US Weekly as out with baby is Gwenyth Paltrow. She usually looks POed that theyh're tkaing pictures, too. But, I agree, they don't create the circus (except Richards right now) that Britney consistently makes.
 
SandraVB79 said:
I have NEVER seen a picture of Catherine wearing something out of the sl*ts-r-us collection Britney seems to like.
Heck, even her costumes in Chicago were covering up more than that!!
True!
12.gif
 
Other famous mothers like Catharine Zeta Jones, Denise Richards, Brooke Shields, Gwenyth Paltrow - they all seem to be able to go out in public with their children without creating a media circus out of the event.

See, the thing is, Britney is in her early 20s, right? Catherine is in her late 30s, and Denise and Gwenyth are in their 30s. Brooke is over 40. With age comes experience, and one would hope, wisdom. All the people on here slamming Britney apparently were as wise right out of the womb as they are now, but most people learn with age.

Beside Catherine is married to the crypt keeper so her circus days are behind her. JUST KIDDING. :thumbsup2
 
alright, i get the having a bad day, everyone's entitled to it, and all of that, but what ever happened to the 'bad day' baggy tshirt and sweats????
 
SandraVB79 said:
I can't believe I'm going to comment Britney Spears? Then don't do it? Nope, I will do it anyway.

Yes. It is her good right to be overwhelmed by the baby and the new pregnancy (didn't know that, don't read the gossip magazines, am busy enough by reading the DIS). Many people are. Nevertheless, she has the money to do something about it. And NO, I don't mean getting rid of the unborn child :rolleyes:
I mean, she has the money to afford a nanny, a nurse, a housekeeper, heck, she's rich enough to afford hiring Mary Poppins!

No. It's no fun to be followed by paparazzi all day everyday. But how come you don't get to see that many pictures like that from catherine zeta jones? Gwyneth? Or so many other celebrities? Because the have some class and decency left!
If Britney would only stop to come out dressed like a sl*t and stop the drama of crying in front of the paparazzi, they would loose interest in her.
Get a stylist, get someone who will shop for you, get a babysit when you want to go out for lunch, stay inside if you feel depressed and need to cry, get a shrink, ...

I'm sorry for her and I'm not. It's not easy being a young mom, but she should also stop putting herself in the middle of the drama.

I haven't seen a picture of Catherina Zeta Jones wearing something like that in public but I have seen a picture of her smoking while pregnant with her daughter. I'd much rather see Britney wearing clothes like that than smoking while pregnant.
 
marymrg said:
If it was just a genuine bad moment(s), I would probably lay low for awhile so that the tabloids could concentrate on someone else. But,that's just me. I would be embarrassed and would want to regroup.

She hasn't been photographed in public since this incident. The only "story" about her in the last week is that she's mad at K-Fed about a $30,000 watch and kicking him out. Nothing baby-related, no pictures of her thong.
 
Brutie said:
If shes overwhelmed so WHAT? She should of thought about that before she got pregnant the first time.

Its hard to feel sorry for stupid.

Well said. It's also hard to feel sorry for her when she stays with that wanna-be rap star LOSER she married.
 
:sad2: Can't say it suprises me. But then again she is not the brightest bulb so maybe she is clueless to just how much of a slob she is becoming
 
poor girl can't do crap without those people on her butt. say let her be a mother and leave her alone.
 
Maybe Britney needs to invest in a stroller to prevent any mishaps in the future if she's going to be wearing 3 inch heels under jeans that drag 2 inches on the ground.

On the subject of strollers vs carrying - Angelina Jolie - why is it she is ALWAYS carrying her kids? Man, that woman must has some intense arm muscles because she has always got a good 20+ pounds strapped to at least one arm.
 
momof3disneyholics said:
Forgetting to wear her shirt into the restaurant, and having to follow the "No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service" rule, Brittney borrowed the tablecloth to wear instead.
 
Daxx said:
Forgetting to wear her shirt into the restaurant, and having to follow the "No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service" rule, Brittney borrowed the tablecloth to wear instead.

Speaking of forgetting to wear a shirt.. true story, happened to DW Lauri today.

She had a young girl come in her store today wearing red short shorts and a bra. Thats it. No shirt, nothing.

She came in to fill out an application for employment. :sad2:

The highlights of her application? Under special interests of hobbies? I don't kill people and I don't steal anymore.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer

New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top Bottom