I would really like to try OOP on our next trip, but my husband much prefers the convenience of pre-paid meals. When we went last June, we actually had several QS credits and a ton of snack credits left over at the end of the trip (I made sure we used all of the TS credits!) - I think it was just too hot to eat so much food!Of course we bought meals from the resort before checking out and took them with us to my mother's house for the kids to eat (we visited her after our Disney vacation), but they wound up going to waste in her refridgerator!
I wish I could convince my husband that it would make more sense to pay OOP. He wants to get the DDxDP this year - which means even more food that will go to waste. Oy vey.![]()
Throwing this question to all who pay OOP...
Do you still do a table-service meal each day?
I think I would still want to. Only thing about DDP is that I just know that my DH would go back to the mindset of ordering something cheaper from than menu as opposed to if we were on DDP & he knew it was already paid for.
I did the math for an upcoming trip for my daughter (6) and I. We are eating 3 buffet meals over a 6 day trip and I come out $100 ahead on the ddp. If it weren't for all the buffets I don't think it would be worth it.
My goal wasn't to save money, rather do what we wanted and eat where we wanted. Rather not be bound by using credits because you paid for them and didn't want to waste them. Granted we didn't purchase meals for my son at every dinner nor did we eat two desserts at every lunch. The last several times we went on the DDP we left several CS behind and I still have bags of lollipops and jellybeans in my pantry.
You have to remember that two of the meals that we did enjoy were signatures and we would have been short dinners two nights on the DDP.
Also granted we didn't get two adult desserts per meal, but we always got an appetizer and a dessert. If you remember from my post the app at the California Grill was a $20 Sushi app that was awesome btw.
The only night we ate two desserts was the night at Kouzzina where we had a $10 app and then two $8.00 sundaes at Beaches & Cream (which I didn't count toward against my paid snacks). I put up the sundaes at B&C against any other dessert.
And our snack count was only 4 short for 8 nights which isn't bad. I know people leave that many snacks on the table all the time. And we weren't bound by what Disney calls a snack. We had several items that were not approved DDP snacks.
So yes, we spent slightly more but I feel that we ate so much better. Plus my meals were portable (LegoLand & SeaWorld). And God forbid one night someone isn't feeling well and wants to skip a dinner, you are not out a credit. You can also share a meal. Eating 8 nights like that you tend to get stuffed.
Even if we weren't going back this summer and didn't get to use the TIW again, I would still do it again. Overall the extra $133 spent was well worth it. I don't know what I would do for a single shorter trip.
We did not deprive ourselves in any manner.
Using the DDP is an exercise in constantly trying to beat the system by eating the most expensive meal all the time and using all of your entitlements. On OOP I can still eat dinner at Le Cellier without using a signature![]()
If I read the OP correctly, they would have needed to pay for one of the signature meals (or 2 other meals), if they had DDP. Also, they would still have had to pay for the food at Legoland & Sea World. These meals seem to be added to the OOP cost, but not added onto the DDP estimate. If that is the case, they really saved quite a bit by paying OOP.
Even if a signature meal, or two cheap meals, were paid for OOP had they done DDP, it wouldn't have totaled the difference. Plus OP said they still ate at WDW on Legoland and Sea World days so that's a non issue. If OP's objective was to save money, that was not successful. But since OP clarified that their goal was not to save money, then it's sensible for them.
OP's experiment is a good example to show the different sides of DDP - you can be "restricted" of sorts to what the DDP offers you, or you can spend more and do what you want. It's like park hopper - restrict yourself to one park per day or spend more and do what you want. Worth it to some, but not to others.
The OP said they spent $133.31 more than if they'd used DDP. It would be difficult to feed a family of three (if their son didn't usually eat) 2 meals or a signature meal for that at WDW. They did say they had dinner at WDW the nights they went to SW & LL, but the other meals those days were eaten off property. I think it's a safe bet that they spent more than $133.31 on all those meals. I'm not advocating whether anyone should or shouldn't use DDP. It does appear the OP saved by paying OOP, unless I misread the original post.