mill4023 said:
I think that is true sometimes, but not always. Sometimes, when you spend more money, you do get what you pay for, but what you are paying for is a fancy name. It really just depends on the product.
I've got a Kenneth Cole wallet. I didn't care about the brand name, it's a wallet for God's sake, but I wanted a RED wallet because I could never find my black wallet in my black lined bag. That was the one that best suited my needs at the time. It's wearing well, I expect I'll have it another ten or more years, and it's almost five years old at this point. For the extra $15 it cost over a no-name wallet at a discount store, it was probably worth it as it is holding up so well, and I'll certainly not think twice about replacing it with another Kenneth Cole when the time comes.
OTOH, I bought a few t-shirts (the type that are a little decorated and suitable for busienss casual with chino's) on sale 50% off or BOGO at Penney's. No brand name, and they are holding up as well as my Perry Ellis t's--that I bought on sale at the outlet, so they were quite reasonable. Had I paid full price for both the JC Penney shirts would have been by far the better value.
I do spend a lot on the pants I wear to work most days. There is a certain style by Eileen Fisher that are just sooooo comfy. They are about $100 a pair, but they wash and dry well, never need an iron, and I've worn each pair 50+ times and they still look brand new, so for me it was money worth spending. I expect that I'll wear them at least 100 times before they even begin to look a bit shopworn. Another pair I have by Gap that were about $50 are looking a bit shopworn after 50 washing and dryings--plus need ironing about every other washing, and a $25 pair by Old Navy I finally gave away because they ALWAYS needed ironing. So that shows that sometimes spending more will get you a better deal in the long run.
But to the OP's post, I always bought Stride Rights for my son when he was small, he now lives in Army boots.
Anne