I am a hybrid owner, roughly 50/50 resale and developer. My resale points are resort-restricted.
There are very few situations in which one can justify a direct purchase on dollars-and-cents terms. I can tell you that there is no way I will ever recover the difference in cost by value of perks. So, why did I do it? I figured I was going to spend at least mid-five-figures on a
DVC ownership that would cover my expected trips to WDW. If I am spending that much, there is no reason to buy the thing I
almost want instead of the thing I
actually want. And, becuase I had the cash on hand (thanks to some savings plus the proceeds of downsizing my house) it was a thing I could buy as a
the divorce is final gift* to myself.
So, if what you want is to have direct benefits and future-proofed points, and you have the cash on hand to buy them, then just buy them. Money is for spending**. If among the currently available resorts you have a strong preference--
for whatever reason--then that's the one to buy. You don't need us to justify your preferences for you to feel good about it. Just do it.
-------
*: It was that or a Mustang convertible, and that's too cliche even for me.
**: One big caveat: If you have to finance the purchase for any non-trivial amount of interest, that's a different thing entirely. For me, money is for spending only if it is
my money, not the bank's.
DVC was at 1.7M sales for 2025 as of November, which does not match their pace of construction.
That sounds a lot more grim than I think the data justifies.
Since very late 2019, DVC has opened three resorts: RIV, GFV-2, and PIT. The next resort (Lakeshore) is going to open in early 2027. So, those three buildings all consume about six years worth of sales time: 2020-2026, inclusive.
The points in RIV + PIT are about 6.8M (RIV) and 3.6M (PIT), or a total of 10.4M. If you scale that 1.7M through December, you get roughly 1.85M/year. Over six years, that comes to 11.1M. GFV-2 was 1.8M, but it was also a very cheap flip, so the "construction pace" is somewhere
between 10.4M (ignoring GFV) and 12.2M (if you count it as stick-built.) My guess is that the Disney accountants probably value it somewhere in the middle---and at 50% that puts it almost smack dab equal to the current pace.
In other words, I don't think they are
that far off in their pace of construction vs. pace of sales. It looks close enough to me. And the evidence is that Disney's financial people believe that as well, else they would have kept Lakeshore on the back burner a little bit longer. I can't think of a reason why they
had to re-start construction when they did, which suggests to me that it was a very intentional decision.