I just want to chime in that before disney implemented an age cutoff at V&A I was there one night when a family showed up with two children under the age of five. The little girl was fine but her younger brother was disruptive in the extreme - luckily the parents realized they were in the wrong environment and they left after about 30 minutes and two courses of food.
So there are people out there, especially at Disney, who will push the envelope and seem to think that their kids belong everywhere. I've lost count of how many times over the years that I've seen parents with children in bars at WDW, including places at Pleasure Island before all the good stuff was closed and even at La Cava in Epcot. I must be showing my age but when I was a wee lass this wasn't generally accepted behavior.
It's unfortunate that Disney has to put an age limit in place that penalizes some because of the lack of consideration (or common sense) of others, but I applaud them for recognizing the need to do so. As someone else stated earlier,
DCL has adults only dining on their ships and it works quite well - and they have far fewer options overall for people to choose from. Maintaining two upscale dining establishments with age limitations for children out of hundreds of possible resort choices doesn't strike me as unreasonable.
I expect children at WDW and for the most part enjoy watching them experience all that Disney has to offer. But I also enjoy the opportunity to have a quiet, intimate meal with my husband and / or friends without having it interrupted by screaming tantrums and romper room antics, both of which we have experienced at Bistro in the past two years.
At any rate, this is one of those discussions where we are all going to have to agree to disagree. I promise never to attend the princess meal in Norway and disrupt the antics there with demands for Aquavit ever again if we so-called grown-ups can have dinner at Bistro with the certainty that there won't be any small children running around with badly behaved parents.
