Big government picks on the Scouts

Van Helsing

My glass is half empty.
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Messages
1,390
A Boy Scout troop tried to put a dent in a potential $14 million judgment Friday by selling lemonade -- at $250 a glass.

The federal and state governments earlier this week sued the Boy Scouts of America to recover costs of the 2002 East Fork fire, allegedly started by Utah Scouts.

"C'mon, we need your help!" shouted one Scout to cars whizzing past during morning rush hour.

Troop 347 of Fruit Heights, a suburb north of Salt Lake City, was not involved in the camping trip two years ago that officials say precipitated the fire -- a fact that the boys pointed out to potential donors -- but they still wanted to help their fellow Scouts.

The 12- and 13-year-olds spent two hours hawking lemonade to build up a fund in case the Boys Scouts lose the lawsuit.

But $14 million is a lot of lemonade, so prices were inflated a bit. A sip cost $1, a small glass $3 and for $250, folks could get a large -- about 16 ounces.

"If only one person in 40 in the entire state of Utah buys a large, it's over," said Scott Fisher, a morning radio disc jockey who helped organize the fund-raising event.

Salt Lake City attorney Paul Gotay handed the Scouts a $10 bill for "just a little bit" of lemonade.

Gotay, a criminal defense attorney, said he heard about the stunt on the radio and wanted to come by to support the boys.

"What's more important? Teaching them what they did was wrong by showing them that there's no forgiveness for something they did unintentionally?" he asked. "That's not how the system should work."

They needed more donors like Gotay. After two hours, they had netted only $66.43.

"It's just the beginning," Fisher said, calculating that with 210,000 similarly lucrative lemonade sales, the $14 million would be raised.

The lawsuit filed Tuesday alleges that about 20 Boy Scouts ages 11 to 14 were left without adult supervision for a night outside an approved campground. Some of the boys built fires that were left to smolder and spread across more than 14,000 acres, the lawsuit says.

U.S. Attorney Paul Warner said the complaint seeks $13.3 million for the federal costs of fighting the fire and reclaiming charred land in the Uinta Mountains. The state is asking more than $600,000 for its firefighting expenses.

The Great Salt Lake Council has told state officials it has more than enough insurance to cover the costs, said Assistant Attorney General Mike Johnson.

The fire started June 28, 2002, inside or near the East Fork of the Bear River Boy Scout Camp, about 35 miles south of Evanston, Wyoming. It blackened 14,200 acres of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest and caused an estimated $150,000 in damage within the Scout camp to 12 camping sites, a rifle range, climbing towers, some latrines and several thousand feet of water lines.

Flames forced evacuation of the Scout camp, nearby campgrounds and summer homes, and prompted officials to close most of the north slope of the Uinta Mountains to the public.

The Boy Scouts have not admitted responsibility for the fire. Rob Wallace, a BSA attorney, said Tuesday questions remain about how the fire started, and that it's possible people using all-terrain vehicles were to blame. The U.S. attorney's office said the Forest Service reported no ATVs were in the area at the time.



And just think the U.S Government has just spent only $366 million of the $18.4 billion President Bush and Congress provided last fall for rebuilding Iraq.




Now how much are they after the Scouts for again ???? :mad:
 
Why do I not have you on my Ignore list:rolleyes:
 
I'm more concerned about children being left alone to fend for themselves. Has any adult in the troop been brought up on charges of child endangerment and neglect? If not, why not?

The adults who run the Boy Scouts obviously felt it was appropriate to leave these young boys alone. Therefore, they, as adults, are responsible for any damage caused. In this case, it's millions of dollars in fire damage.

They should consider themselves fortunate that this wasn't worse. Those 20 children could have been seriously injured or worse. I have no sympathy for the Boy Scouts in this case.

And what, exactly, does this have to do with the war in Iraq?
 

Excuse me, but the Boy Scout "Leaders" left these boys unsupervised outside an approved area. They started a fire and didn't properly put it out. Therefore, I believe they are responsible for the damage.

The woman in Colorado who started the fire there is in prison and faces fines. Shouldn't people be held responsible for their actions?
 
My son is a Cub Scout and I don't think it is unreasonable for the people responsible to be asked to pay for their negligence. If my son had been left alone during a Scout sponsored campout in which I thought there was adequate supervision, I personally would have raised you-know-what about it.

VH: I agree that this has absolutely nothing to do w/Iraq. :rolleyes:
 
The Boy Scouts have not admitted responsibility for the fire. Rob Wallace, a BSA attorney, said Tuesday questions remain about how the fire started, and that it's possible people using all-terrain vehicles were to blame.


Even if they did whats 13million to the U.S government - they've just spent $366 million of the $18.4 billion for Iraq.


Bush give the kids a break :mad:
 
pleeease...the kids started the fire so the kids pay for the damage...makes sense to me. what the heck does bush have to do with anything.
 
"The lawsuit filed Tuesday alleges that about 20 Boy Scouts ages 11 to 14 were left without adult supervision for a night outside an approved campground. Some of the boys built fires that were left to smolder and spread across more than 14,000 acres, the lawsuit says."

Sorry, Bush should NOT cover this!! :rolleyes: What idiots were responsible for the scouts and left them alone? OVERNIGHT? They should be paying a loooooooooooooooooooooong time!! After them, or along with them, the families of the boys! :rolleyes:
 
According to what I read in the original post. There is no proof as to who or what was responsible for starting the fire, only speculation that it was started by the boy scouts.
 
pleeease...the kids started the fire so the kids pay for the damage...makes sense to me.

Wow where you there :crazy:

Sorry, Bush should NOT cover this!!

So why pay ( $18.4 billion ) for rebuilding Iraq - how about rebuilding America - better schools - better housing - better hospitals - better transport....
 
Now how much are they after the Scouts for again ????

that is horrable :(

VH: I agree that this has absolutely nothing to do w/Iraq.


well we are too busy helping everyone else in far away countries that we are taking money from our own children and their well being. I mean I am a vet and fully support our country, but it just doesn't seem right that we are taking from our kids and giving to Iraq? if we can spend billions there then we can help the scouts that are here.

people keep asking what does it have to do with Iraq? well what doesn't have to do with Iraq?All Money in our government has been affected by Iraq. You know what? There are three cities that I know of in minnesota that can't have fireworks this year? One right here on the Iron range. They had a decission to make .. cut a job or the fireworks! they chose to cut the fireworks. All because of state cuts that in effect were because of the big spending in Iraq. They have to take the money some where. Lucky 2 cities raised the money to get them but one city is out. Ya see there is a trickle affect. Everything is affected. Hubby was not able to get a school grant at the last semester because there were cuts. He had been able to get it all throughout school years. But the gov. was then saying they are going to cut all grants to those who absolutely need them. sense the VA was paying we didn't need them. Well it was nice to know beforehand. :rolleyes: when we counted on them. It was explained that the gov. needs to recoop it's money somehow. I dunno....I support the troops and even the pres at times lol... but this money thing is way out of hand.... so many things are being cut to support the war. I guess this is the price we pay? It will get better I know...
 
Originally posted by Van Helsing
So why pay ( $18.4 billion ) for rebuilding Iraq - how about rebuilding America - better schools - better housing - better hospitals - better transport....
Iraq has nothing to do with this. And I would much rather see a country be rebuilt than cover irresponsible kids.
 
Originally posted by Van Helsing
I think ginna74 post above proves your wrong Pin Wizard :rolleyes:
Oh, really!! :rolleyes: I don't think so. :) That's strictly her opinion you are getting. Personally, I've been applying for federal jobs, and thanks to the war, there are freezes. Haven't see a new job posted in my area in a couple weeks at least. It's not just certain things being cut. Where's her "documentation"? :teeth:
 
Originally posted by Van Helsing
I think ginna74 post above proves your wrong Pin Wizard :rolleyes:
Oh, really!! :rolleyes: I don't think so. :) That's strictly her opinion you are getting. Personally, I've been applying for federal jobs, and thanks to the war, there are freezes. Haven't see a new job posted in my area in a couple weeks at least. It's not just certain things being cut. Where's her "documentation"? :teeth:
 
Originally posted by Van Helsing
I think ginna74 post above proves your wrong Pin Wizard :rolleyes:
Oh, really!! :rolleyes: I don't think so. :) That's strictly her opinion you are getting. Personally, I've been applying for federal jobs, and thanks to the war, there are freezes. Haven't see a new job posted in my area in a couple weeks at least. It's not just certain things being cut. Where's her "documentation"? :teeth:
 
Originally posted by ginna74
that is horrable :(




well we are too busy helping everyone else in far away countries that we are taking money from our own children and their well being.
This discussion is about the scouts. They were irresponsible in their actions...period. Bush shouldn't cover their butts. Kids and adults responsible for it should be paying one way or another if anyone. Community Service for quite a while would be a great beginning.
 
But I don't see anywhere where they have positive proof who or what started the fire.

They say the scouts "allegedly" started the fire. How can they blame them without proof.

Just because they were camping alone does not mean they necessarily are irresponsible or started the fire.
 
Just because they were camping alone does not mean they necessarily are irresponsible or started the fire.


I agree ::yes::


Give the kids a break and take the money out of the Iraqi slush fund :mad:
 





New Posts










Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top