Tigger&Belle
<font color=blue>I'm the good girl on the DIS<br><
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2000
- Messages
- 37,734
Could be worse...everyone could be wearing Crocs..
I guess I think it's tacky not to wear shoes in a grocery store.


Could be worse...everyone could be wearing Crocs..
I guess I think it's tacky not to wear shoes in a grocery store.
That is disgusting! For the people who are wondering what the health risk is, the OP said the girl had the shoes in her hands and then was reaching into candy bins. That's poop in the candy!![]()
That is disgusting! For the people who are wondering what the health risk is, the OP said the girl had the shoes in her hands and then was reaching into candy bins. That's poop in the candy!![]()
That said, I cannot believe the manager could compare that to a person with a service animal.I don't recall losing your sight being a choice.
Was she rubbing her hands all over the bottom of the shoes?
Honestly, while I wouldn't go barefoot in a grocery store, I don't see carrying ones shoes as the ultimate in poor sanitation. I agree with all the others that said there have probably been a lot more dirty hands in those candy bins (and handling the produce as well).
I think the wrong kind of "code" is being discussed..there must be a health code that covers this...
BANNED!![]()
As someone who is actually going blind the comment about the seeing eye dog just pisses me off to no end. There are so many ignorant people out there. I hope you do report her especially about that part.
BANNED!![]()
I have no idea what she was doing with the shoes, I wasn't there. I never said that carrying ones shoes was the ultimate in poor sanitation. I've carried my shoes many times, just never in a store. Please feel free to put words in my mouth.![]()
Well, you said "There's poop in the candy". So, I am was kind of referring to that phrase.
I never put words in your mouth nor did I say you felt it was the ultimate in poor sanitation; that was kind of a general statement.
Oh man you have to go shopping in your underwear now!!!
Then I apologize. I didn't read it that way.
I'd like to just say that the WORST part of this is what the mgr said about the dog (I mentioned that in my post as well). That is just wrong and sad.
And, for me the part about not wearing shoes is just wrong. Not just because I love shoes.I would not allow my child to walk around without shoes in a store. Because it's tacky. I guess I am in the minority that feels that shoes are a bare minimum requirement, and that's ok.
I wish I looked better in them because I definitly would do it!!! But maybe walking around in my skivvies the way I do look would be more than needed to get them to change the policy!!![]()
Well I'm right there with you.I don't want to think about feet and food and whether or not there's pus from a blister on her fingers or whatever. To me it's nasty plain and simple.As for non handwashers I at least don't have to see it--so out of sight out of mind
And, for me the part about not wearing shoes is just wrong. Not just because I love shoes.I would not allow my child to walk around without shoes in a store. Because it's tacky. I guess I am in the minority that feels that shoes are a bare minimum requirement, and that's ok.