I'm not going to spoil it..but the Village ending might have you demanding your money back.Originally posted by Planogirl
I hope that The Village is good because I've really been looking forward to it! I've heard that King Arthur is pretty good too.
Originally posted by KNWVIKING
***"I'm not going to spoil it..but the Village ending might have you demanding your money back."***
Sounds like you just did.
OH please give it up...nothing has been spoiled by someone telling you they think the ending of a movie sucks. If so you should never listen to criticism or leave the house again.Originally posted by KNWVIKING
***"Great now tell us all what the ending is now that I've spoiled it for you."***
Well, lets see..... I'm sitting in the theater watching a movie that I'm enjoying when I suddenly remember that Phoebesaturn say's I'll be disappointed in the ending. While you haven't actually told us the ending, you kinda said " great restaurant,but you'll be disappointed with the food".
Originally posted by MPLsDad
I though the end of The Village was awesome - I hope there is a sequel!All better now? Let's play nice!
Originally posted by jarestel
For people who know the Arthur story, the movie is a BIG disappointment. It's like they just took the names and made up a completely different plot. I'm not surprised if this thing is a bust.
Originally posted by mickey4ver
I didn't see this as making up another plot, it supposedly happened in 459 a.d. which is way before other King Arthur tales, so perhaps this is based on some new evidence of his tale and this is how it is being interpreted. I even think if I remember at the beginning of the film, this is stated, based on new historical findings. JMHO![]()
I don't agree at all! I very much enjoyed King Arthur. I know the Arthur stories and Camelot backwards and forwards -- read them all a hundred times. (And I can sing the entire score of Camelot, although I'll save that for another time.) Yet I truly enjoyed this version of it and the new historical context. Of course, if you believe that the Camelot version is the one and only absolute truth of the Arthur legends and you're not intrigued by the thought that there could be a different take on it all, then I could understand your disappointment. But I thought it was great fun, with some wonderful scenery, a lot more humor than I'd expected, and it made me want to take another look at that part of England and who Arthur was. Oh ... and who knew Galahad was that hot?Originally posted by jarestel
For people who know the Arthur story, the movie is a BIG disappointment. It's like they just took the names and made up a completely different plot. I'm not surprised if this thing is a bust.
1 1 Spider-Man 2 Sony $46,000,000
2 N Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy DW $28,000,000
3 N King Arthur BV $15,155,000
4 2 Fahrenheit 9/11 Lions $11,000,000
5 6 The Notebook NL $6,525,000
6 3 White Chicks Sony $6,500,000
7 4 DodgeBall: A True Underdog Story Fox $5,400,000
8 5 The Terminal DW $5,000,000
9 8 Shrek 2 DW $4,500,000
10 N Sleepover MGM $4,200,000