- Joined
- Feb 6, 2000
- Messages
- 30,789
Remember, though, DVC is supposed to be policing commercial renters, with the policy of no more than 20 rental in a period of time (a year I think). Given that, one single company can't be monopolizing all the availability, the deeds would have to be registered under many different owners/memberships (Mother, Mother and Son, Mother and Daughter, Dad and son, Dad and Daughter, Dad, Dad and Mom, and so forth) If a family owns a lot of memberships in that way, and the individual memberships are not hitting DVCs yearly limit, what do you think could be legally done that wouldn't have a very negative impact on the DVC members that rarely rents their points? DVC could set the threshold lower, say 10 rentals, but even myself, who rented out just 100 point last year, had 4 or 5 seperate renters wher they were just 1 or 2 night rentals. If I had 200 or so points to rent, and they were short stays, I'd probably be close to hitting th threshold.Except demand in the case of a company now means trying to get ALL of the cheapest studio rentals and trying to resell them. Trying to maximize reselling dvc rentals was never supposed to be part of the original point and rule structure.
There is 0 reason I shouldn't be able to get a single random day in a Studio in January out of 22 potential dates at 11 months out.
Last edited: