disneygal66 said:
I know that this has only been FDA approved for autistic kids since October.
I just wanted to mention something about 'medication approval'. I'm a nurse and may not understand or be able to explain this as well as a doctor or pharmacist since I can't prescribe any drugs.
It is good to be cautious, but I want to assure you that having a drug only approved for autistic childen for a short while doesn't necessarily mean it has only been used for a short while.
Each drug in the US has specific things/conditions it is approved to treat. These are the things that the drug manufacturer has done scientific studies to prove that the drug is both safe and effective for. The drug manufacturer decides which conditions to do/submit studies on to the FDA.
Once the manufacturer has enough studies to prove to the FDA that it is safe and effective for that thing/condition, that can be listed as an 'indication for use' that it is approved for. When the drug is used for one of the listed 'indications for use', using it for that condition is called an 'on label use.' Because most drug studies start out on adults, drugs are usually approved first for use on adults and the drug is advertised for those uses. Use/studies with children usually come after the drug has been approved for adults for a while. Depending on the condition, drug and whether or not the manufacturer decides to pursue approval, it may never be actually approved for use with children.
After it has been in use for a while, doctors start using it for similar conditions (that is called 'off label use'), because, even though they might be very similar, they are not the exact condition the drug is approved to treat. The manufacturer may decide not to do studies to get that condition listed as an indication (drug studies are expensive and it may not be cost effective to do).
As some people mentioned here, their children were on the drug before it was officially 'approved' for that use in children. That frequently happens, as doctors see studies (often not done by the drug companies) or talk with their peers about use in different ages and different conditions.
That happened with one of the drugs my DD is on; there were some studies of using the drug for some children/adults with cerebral palsy who had shakiness or muscle tremors. One of her doctors read the studies and suggested we try the medication, which was helpful to her. The only approved indication for the medication is Parkinson's disease. I don't see that they will ever go thru the hoops to approve it for other conditions (too few to really study well) or to get it approved for children (not many kids out there with Parkinson's).
She is also on Lamictal, used for seizures. Even though when she started it, it was approved for use with children, it was approved as a medication to use with other anti-seizure medications, not all by itself. It has since been approved as monotherapy (a drug used alone) for seizures, but for many years, she was using it 'off-label'.
Anyway, I just wanted to assure you that 'just recently approved' doesn't necessarily mean it hasn't been used for a while for that condition/age group.