I never noticed a change in my take home but I also had a lot of changes thoughout the year like flexible spending account, 401K adjustments, etc.
. Since when is 17 yrs old no longer a child? He lived in my house the entire year. He won't graduate until summer 2011 at the age of 18 1/2 so I will be caring for him 100% this year and 1/2 of next year and all of last year. BS!! If he had turned 17 on January 1st, I would have an extra $1,000 in my bank account which is huge for this single mom, one income family.TT told me I am going to owe about $7K-$8K this year, when last year we got a small refund! Same jobs, income about $15K higher. How can we owe half the increase in taxes?!?! We didn't change our witholding, and I didn't think the one they did automatically would change things THAT much!
So yes, getting less back - as in OWING TONS instead!!!
TT told me I am going to owe about $7K-$8K this year, when last year we got a small refund! Same jobs, income about $15K higher. How can we owe half the increase in taxes?!?! We didn't change our witholding, and I didn't think the one they did automatically would change things THAT much!
So yes, getting less back - as in OWING TONS instead!!!
That was us last night too...we went to have our taxes done and I am still in shock! I picked up an extra job, gave more than we usually do, and thought we would get less back...never thought we would owe for at least another 3-4 years as we start losing deductions for the kids. The tax guy we have used for the last 12 years looked miserable as he told us. Told us we were in the majority of middle class that gets...well you know the word I am looking for!!!
I just did my taxes last night and I owe $2k. I thought I would break even or get a little back. I just don't get it. Last year I owed 1500, but that situation was unique, but still to owe this year. We have worked so hard to build up a little savings now that DH works minimal hours and out the door the WHOLE thing will go. It's very frustrating. We were moved into the next tax bracket by $1400. That was my summer work last year. I just shouldn't have worked, we would have owed less.

Depending on your income level, that could have thrown you into AMT range.
Or, if you were right on the edge of one tax bracket and got bumped up to another, your going to have a HUGE tax jump.
Also remember if you haven't yet put money in IRA's you can still do that until April 15 and still claim it on last years taxes.
The AMT thing I can't figure out, but I can't see how the increase in income could have such a huge effect...maybe that's it.

Or, if you were right on the edge of one tax bracket and got bumped up to another, your going to have a HUGE tax jump.
Count me in for the "getting a lot less" this year club. I owe over $2,000 compared to my $2,600 refund last year.
1st, my payroll screwed up my W-4 withholdings about 1/2 way thru the year = they stopped taking federal taxes out mid-year!!I never noticed a change in my take home but I also had a lot of changes thoughout the year like flexible spending account, 401K adjustments, etc.
2nd, my son turned 17 on December 26 = I lost the $1,000 tax credit for him. Since when is 17 yrs old no longer a child? He lived in my house the entire year. He won't graduate until summer 2011 at the age of 18 1/2 so I will be caring for him 100% this year and 1/2 of next year and all of last year. BS!! If he had turned 17 on January 1st, I would have an extra $1,000 in my bank account which is huge for this single mom, one income family.
3rd, I missed the earned income credit by $462 for our family of 3.
So, my taxes have been shoved in a drawer and I will revisit them sometime on April 15.
After doing a little reading, the above is evidently NOT how the AMT works. And next year, when the AMT threshold will apparently be lowered (2010 tax year) - I don't even want to THINK about what we're going to owe in taxes. It's just icky.No you aren't, that's not how our tax system works. To keep it simple, let's say there were 3 tax brackets: 10%, 20% and 30%, 3 income brackets: $10,000, $20,000 and anything over $20k, and no deductions. So pretend you made $21,000. You would pay:
10% of $10,000 - $1000
20% of $10,001 to $20,000 - $2000
30% of $1000 - $300
So by making that extra $1000 your effective tax rate would jump from 15% to 16.5%
Our taxes seem all messed up in Turbo Tax. We seem to be getting back way more than we should be. I'm half tempted to try another software or H&R Block to double check TT!
I think you are confusing things. A refund is an overpayment of tax. To compare apples to apples you need to look at your tax bill (Line 44 on a standard 1040) from 2008 and 2009. If your income is exactly the same last year as this year these two numbers should be similar. You adjusted yourNothing changed here and we are getting about 40% less back and we did adjust our withholdings.
I think you are confusing things. A refund is an overpayment of tax. To compare apples to apples you need to look at your tax bill (Line 44 on a standard 1040) from 2008 and 2009. If your income is exactly the same last year as this year these two numbers should be similar. You adjusted your
withholding, so you paid less towards your tax bill over the year. Why would you expect your refund to be the same if you adjusted your payments?

Your tax bill is your tax bill. How much you pay towards it is a separate issue. If your tax bill is $3,000 and you pay $4000 over the year thru payroll deductions then you get $1,000 back. If you only pay in $2500 via payroll deductions you owe $500.I don't understand how that would work either??![]()
After doing a little reading, the above is evidently NOT how the AMT works. And next year, when the AMT threshold will apparently be lowered (2010 tax year) - I don't even want to THINK about what we're going to owe in taxes. It's just icky.



and now we will just be paying it back to the government.
there was a thing they did where they gave everyone an extra about 10 dollars per pay period but really they were giving you a bit of your tax refund in incrememnts a little early... it accounts to about 750$ i believe could that have affected any of you?
It sounds like you qualified for the first time home buyers tax credit hence the big refund. That is a one time rebate. It is all about the math, if you bought a small dollar low value house then your interest deduction still may be less than the standard deduction. You should have run the numbers before adjusting your withholdings. Also, you should verify that you didn't tick the box that said "take the itemized even if lower" on the tax software. Buying a house doesn't always guarantee that your tax bill will be lower.We are in the same boat as the PP who is paying in a ton this year
Our income hasn't changed but we did change our withholdings thinking that since we bought a house we would get more back this year (itemizing rather than standard deductions). The difference in our withholdings amounts to $1050 a year, I would be fine with owing that $1050 back but no... we owe more like $2-4K depending on which tax software we used
We were able to get the $8K back with our taxes last year since we bought our house early enough in 2009 we were able to claim it on 2008's taxes. We finally got the refund in October of this past yearand now we will just be paying it back to the government.
So much for tax breaks![]()
Your tax bill is your tax bill. How much you pay towards it is a separate issue. If your tax bill is $3,000 and you pay $4000 over the year thru payroll deductions then you get $1,000 back. If you only pay in $2500 via payroll deductions you owe $500.
The poster did not give us this information. Let's take a simple example of someone whose AGI stayed the same. In 2008 AGI was 50,000 hence the tax due would be $6701Sure, that's a no brainer. If the PP adjusted her witholding so that more was taken out, if her tax rate stayed the same, and she paid in more, then why would her obligation to the IRS be larger?
Perhaps fewer deductions?
If the income and tax burden remained the same, and the witholding was changed to send more in with each pay period, then other than fewer deductions, why would the tax bill go up?
That's why I don't understand.