What an inane thing to say. I must have really struck a nerve. I'm sorry that you felt driven to post such an extreme bit of ridiculousness.

I'll make my point very clear, so there is no similar confusion driving you down a similar path:
Medical experts make better medical decisions than random posters on the Internet, like you.
This is exactly what I was trying to help you with. Let me walk you through this...
1. In your previous post(#64) to me you(Bicker) stated, "I think that almost anyone other than you would have no problem granting that medical experts make better medical decisions than random posters on the Internet, like you. Why you cannot admit that is bewildering..."
2. I responded(post #68) by saying that I "would have no problem admitting that medical experts make better decisions than random posters. I merely said that everyone is entitled to their opinion."
3. Now, here's where it gets bizarre. You(Bicker) decide to respond(post #73) by saying, "I'll make my point very clear, so there is no similar confusion driving you down a similar path: Medical experts make better medical decisions than random posters on the Internet, like you."
I had already agreed with you. It seems you are either not reading the posts, or not comprehending them. If a person agrees with your statement, then there is no reason to post a rebuttal. It seems like you are just responding for no other reason than to bicker. Can you see that now?