- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
I’m not disagreeing they shouldn’t suspend ap I’m saying if they suspend it they need to reflect that in the language of the closing documents. How long do you feel they should be able to continue falsely advertising a benefit they aren’t currently offering? Can this continue for 10 years? Can they make up other benefits with no intention to offer and just say “subject to change” when people try to get the benefit? Where do you draw the line between saying it’s okay becuse it’s unprecedented times? For me over a year is no longer an excuse. They need to offer the benefit or change language to accurately reflect what’s being offered.
The way I see it though is that it is still a benefit for DVC members but suspended due to the pandemic, The program itself has not been discontinued.
It may be semantics, but to me saying it’s gone is not accurate either. It’d be the same to say that all the language regarding spa or dining discounts at closed places need to be changed too because I cant get those either.
Personally, I think the fact that it hasn’t been removed is a good indication that DPEP will be reinstating APs as soon as they can.