I guess this is a question we can pose to the Disney community! Traditionally, large structures with visual appeal are typically referred to as "weenies" - but could the popularity of a single attraction, in this example an animal, be considered a weenie (maybe a sub-category) as well? Taking this beyond Animal Kingdom, we could look at popular attractions, such as Sorin' or Haunted Mansion, that have a large fan base and are generally well known among those going to Disney, would they be considered "weenies" - as they are magnets that draw guests further into the park.
I agree with
@ZooNerd1 especially if you think in terms of AK as being a zoo. If you ever go to SD Zoo, you’ll see the similarities in the park entrance and the trails; not to mention Disney gleaned the Flights of Wonder Imagineer from SD.
Zoos do have “flagship attractions” (animal species), so in that regard an animal exhibit inside a Disney park could qualify?
I will continue to disagree ... I do not believe an animal or having animals on exhibit fit the definition of a "
Disney Weenie". The buildings, the layout to impact movement, the placement of special attractions, even the architecture design items on the animal trails .. it is often the Disney imagineering that make those trails special from a traditional zoo.
Yes the Safari ... as an attraction is a draw so it could be a weenie due to it's architecture both hardscape and landscape, the upside down trees, the bridges, the waterways.... Augustus is popular because he's a baby but in two years you won't even know which hippo he is in the crowd. He does not fall into the definition of a weenie. I could give other business comparisons but seeing Augustus is just a moment in time. You could equally go direct there and ride the safari and not see him, or elephants or giraffes etc. I rode twice in a week; one time I had a great view of Augustus, the next time he was along the wall under us and no one saw him. Not a weenie.
I think there is a difference between going to a zoo in hopes to see and enjoy a particular animal ......... and going to a Disney park and seeing the Hat, the Tree of Life, Everest, Pandora, the Castle .... and all the imagineered items that are there to see. Animals are not imagineered. Yes, AK is approved of a zoo, it has areas that function as a zoo and it's an important part of the conservation process ... but I would venture most folks (and often reflected here) look at it as a theme park with Pandora, Dinosaur, Everest, Lion King Show, Nemo Show, Kali .... and the animals are often completely ignored by many.
To an individual, yes an animal might be their most important thing to see, but I don't believe a living, moving, changing animal is what is defined as a "Disney weenie" - which I see as always described as ... my best one word is
hardscape.