Yes, we are already well aware of the limitations and decided to purchase. I'm not complaining, but it seems as though you are not happy.No, my point is that it is the CL lounge, not the DVC lounge - if it was the latter, all DVC members would be allowed to use it. And, yes, I know it is a dollars thing - WDW wouldn't do it if it didn't think it would make more money for the company. You all are likely underestimating the number of AKV CL rooms - they are converting those rooms on the 5th floor too, many of which were AKL CL rooms. I'm guessing that what this does for WDW is get more people to stay there at non-peak times plus of course, it gets lots of money up front. Look at how many people on these boards jumped in to buy a ton of points the very first day they could without even knowing all the details yet.
As for the 11 month window, it is your choice to buy the points so you have to accept that limitation. We have stayed in villas before but decided we preferred the greater flexibility of renting whenever and wherever we choose. I expect there will be AKV villas for non-members to rent too.
I'm really not sure. I'm just going by the "One 2br = three hotel room" formula.How many concierge rooms are being taken out to make the 5 two bedroom units for DVC? Is it 15?
It is interesting to hear from someone on the other side of this issue. As happy as we are that DVC members will have access to concierge level for the first time, it means loyal AKL CL fans are losing the convience of having a room close to the lounge, giving up the larger rooms at AKL, and competing for fewer CL rooms. I can certainly understand why you would be disappointed over these changes.As a long time fan of AKL, especially its CL, but not a DVC member, I have to say it is very interesting to read the DVC thread on this and compare it to the Resort Board threads on our wonderful AKL CL. The 6th floor lounge is CL's space and it is being taken over by DVC - we long-time AKL CL'ers are terribly upset about it. The AKL CL and IPO staff are the absolute best in all of WDW and we all sure hope the service doesn't suffer due to its change in management to DVC. We were devastated to learn that our access is being limited and our room choices downgraded to "standard" rooms because of DVC. CL access has always been limited and it is a "lottery" now in many ways. You guys just have to join the rest of us who want CL access and have to book it far in advance to get it. As for those who only want it to do the Safari, join the other non-DVC owners who want the same thing and think the safari should be open to anyone staying at AKL.
Nice.MG - you may want to go read this thread to get some background:
http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1349889
You can reserve them at 11 months, guaranteed.
Don't give me that typical BVC condescending attitude!
Let me know how booking a Grand Villa works at 11 months for you........oops that's right, there are none!
Not that I want any but I can book any room at SSR at 7 months. You are making my point...and I don't own BCV it was just an example. Any resort other than SSR has a booking advantage for it's owners. I guess you should have researched this a bit more before your purchase.
Not that I want any but I can book any room at SSR at 7 months. You are making my point...and I don't own BCV it was just an example. Any resort other than SSR has a booking advantage for it's owners. I guess you should have researched this a bit more before your purchase.
we long-time AKL CL'ers are terribly upset about it.
And I only see one or two people in that thread that are "terribly upset" about it.Apparently not so much...there are all of five (including you) non DVC people on that thread. In the scope of things that's not very many upset people.
And I only see one or two people in that thread that are "terribly upset" about it.
MG
And only 1 upset enough to compare us to animals!![]()
I love when I read ignorance of others, especially when they try to pass off thier opinion as facts. SSR is large, but to state that all rooms types are always available at the 7 month mark is rediculous. You are pulling that out of your........thin air. When is the last time you called and asked about room availability at SSR. Probably never, but that's just a guess on my part. I know what amenities and features each resort has and does not have. Apparently more then you, since you were not aware of the dedicated 2 bedroom at SSR. What about the Grand Villa situation. Three replies to my posts, but you skip over that aspect.
Humor me and list what you apparently feel is the home booking advantage at each resort, that SSR does not have.
And reread my last post, I didn't write that you owned at BCV. Just had the attitude, which you do!
You know this is one arguement I have no desire to really get into, as I have no desire to stay at AKL.
But I can see both sides. Those that are DVC and think it is no big deal, have you stayed at AKL concierge before? If not, not sure you can state whether or not it will have an adverse affect as you will have nothing to compare with.
Personally even though I enjoy my DVC I think DVC when it was added to BC and WL brought some negatives to a resort we had enjoyed many times prior to DVC. Again unless you were frequent guests at BC and WL prior to DVC, not sure you would understand.
As to the animal reply if you go back and read the entire thread, a DVC member stated that many DVC members are territorial and hence the comment about animals, as many animals are territorial also.
Mainly time will tell if DVC can provide the same quality experience at the AKL concierge as it has in the past when Disney resorts had it.
Um, SSR has Dedicated 2 bedroom and grand villas! BCV does not have any Grand Villas. So I think there is advantages at SSR for home booking.