Snake drops out of a tree, bites boy on finger (how does a snake drop out of a tree and bite somebody on the finger?), family gets treatment for kid AT THE PARK, the nurse cleans the bite and puts a bandaid on it (this was obviously not a venomous snake), the family goes back to the park for the day. Apparently they are claiming that grandma suffered a heart attack due to the stress of seeing a snake bite her grandson. When exactly does the trauma of seeing the snake incident do in Grandma? The way this story is being reported, most who comment on it are assuming she died right there. Obviously she didn't because the family went back to the park to continue their day...and an ambulance wasn't even called for either the kid or grandma. It could have been hours or even days later.
Florida statute of limitations for wrongful death is two years from the date of death. Of course the lawyer hasn't indicated when the death took place, although the snake incident was apparently in October of 2014. Even if the death was in October they'd still be in the statute period.
On the other hand, the family is alleging that the snake escaped from an exhibit at AK...Disney claims it wasn't their snake. Florida has plenty of wild snakes. If the snake was a wild, nonvenomous snake of the type that generally populates the area, the family refused transport to the hospital or further treatment or assistance for any family member when it was offered, and the death did not occur contemporaneously with the bite incident, where is Disney's liability?
I think my favorite comments are the ones that say Disney should be liable for even allowing wild snakes to enter the park. Absolute favorite is the guy who says Disney should be forced to pay this family for wrongful death because they built their parks outdoors in Florida, where there are wild animals. They should have built in Kansas or someplace to cut the risk of such a thing happening (like there aren't any wild animals in Kansas). They also don't seem clear on the fact that this lawsuit is not based on someone being bitten by a snake; they are claiming that a bystander died at some later time due to the trauma of observing someone else sustaining a minor bite by a non-venomous snake.