A Micro 4/3 at WDW - a photo trip report

boBQuincy

<font color=green>I am not carrying three pods<br>
Joined
Nov 26, 2002
Messages
5,086
Maybe even 2 micro 4/3s
*Long opening, skip down if you just want to see the photos.

We have all seen the requests for a camera that is small, light, inexpensive, and gets great action & low light photos. And we have notified the posters that it doesn't exist or we would not be carrying big heavy dSLRs. But what if recent developments have made such a camera possible, or at least met more of those requests than previously?

To reduce the weight of my kit I went from a Canon 30D to a Rebel Xsi three years ago, from a full size prosumer dSLR to an entry level model. Now to continue the quest for smaller & lighter I tried a micro 4/3, a Panasonic G3. The smaller sensor is going to give up something to APS-C (just as APS-C does to full frame), that is just physics, but is 4/3 large enough?

Some columnists and reviewers think so:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/panasonic_gh2_revisited.shtml
"I have an Epson 3880 printer here, and have been making 13X19" prints, with a number of them now framed and hanging on my walls in San Miguel, as well as several given and sold to friends and acquaintances here. No one has yet said – Gee, I wish you'd shot these with a larger format camera. Is the GH2's image quality good enough? Yes, it is for me..."

The G3 is small alright, the whole kit is just about half the bulk and weight of a Rebel setup! After a couple weeks of trying the G3 I really liked it.

Alright then, if this is going to be "my camera", the one I carry to WDW, then it is going to have to replace the dSLR. It definitely needed some accessories or as Cogsworth said "if we are going to do it, then let's DO it". I ordered a wide angle, long lens, extra battery, and cable release. The whole kit easily fits in the bag which previously held only two lenses, and not happily at that. The full camera bag also weighs less than it used to, a lot less! The G3 seems too small for a neck strap so I fitted a Canon video camera wrist strap which worked well for the trip. Since the camera is so small those with larger hands may not like it. Many people report that the Rebels feel too small and light, they will definitely not like the G3!

Image quality is good, ISO 3200 and up should get some noise reduction and the JPGs are heavily processed but I rarely use JPGs anyway.
Even the kit lens is good but the 45-175 is *really* good and the 7-14 is L series good! While on lenses, there is a 2x magnification factor. This is not a crop factor like APS-C since the u4/3 system was designed for this geometry from the beginning unlike APS-C which shares geometry with film SLRs. Anyway the wide lens equates to 14mm, still pretty wide, but the long lens equates to 350! That is mighty impressive considering it weighs about half a pound, is only 3.5" long, and has IS.
As with cameras, the best lens is the one you carry and for the entire trip I had all three lenses with me at all times, not so with my dSLR outfit.

The electronic viewfinder is different, not as good in some ways but better in many ways than optical viewfinders. It has it's limitations and tracking a subject with a long lens in low light is one of them. Think Birdie in Festival of the Lion King. Now think that if really good photos of Birdie in flight is your goal you may want to look at a different camera. *This was with a f/5.6 lens, when Panasonic releases their 35-100 f/2.8 (or maybe faster) lens early next year that could solve this issue. The viewfinder also seems to use the JPG engine for it's display so colors may be altered by the picture settings. The castle lighting looked more blue in the viewfinder then it really was but the RAW looked fine, for true colors use RAW and trust that you are getting the right color.

While discussing the viewfinder, the long lens shows the focal length in the display! Along with the live histogram (!) the brightness also changes as the settings are adjusted so it is a real live view. Adjusting the manual focus on the lens instantly shows a greatly magnified view to help with focusing. Since the viewfinder shows SO much information there is usually no reason to use the LCD screen. Videos are easy since the camera was designed for that from the start. The shutter is normally open, going through a "close, open, close, open" cycle each time a photo is taken. It sounds a little strange to someone used to a SLR.

Overall the little G3 is fun to use, easy to carry, and gives image quality comparable to most entry level dSLRs at about half the bulk and weight. The price is not smaller though, in fact some entry dSLR kits sell for less than the G3 which may be why Canon and Nikon are only slowly losing market share to the mirrorless cameras.
Like dSLR lenses the price ranges from not bad to OMG! The little camera attracted some attention at WDW, when people saw us changing lenses they realized this was not a P&S dSLR lookalike and a few asked what it was (partly since the wrist strap read "CANON".

On to the photos:

We started at AK and Festival of the Lion King was the first time we tried these cameras in such low light.

fotlk_1000351.jpg


fotlk_1000380.jpg


fotlk_1000410.jpg


fotlk_1000412.jpg

7 mm takes in the giraffe, Pumba, and most of the warthog section!

flamingo_1000419.jpg

From Camp Minnie-Mickey it was around the tree and over to Asia

tiger_1000482.jpg


Then it was time to head to MK for the castle lighting. As expected the flagpole was gone for the parade taping weekend.

mainst_1000537_fused.jpg


and back to Boardwalk.

bw_1000591_2_3_4_5_fused.jpg



Day two was Epcot, where we had lunch at LeCellier

lecellier_fused.jpg


saw some holiday storytellers

canada_1000795.jpg


uk_1000811.jpg


and saw the Candlelight Processional (Edward James Olmos narrating)

cp_1000857.jpg


cp_olmos_1000842.jpg


cpmusic_1000854.jpg


close enough to play the music (if I could play music).

Speaking of music, these guys were really good!

revolution_1000911.jpg


Then it was time for Illuminations and to dispel two notions:
one, that micro 4/3 are not real cameras,
two, that we *must* have a tripod for good fireworks photos. These were taken at 2 seconds, f/16, with only a 3 ounce monopod!

roe_1000929t.jpg


roe_1000943t.jpg



The next day we were off to Hollywood Studios to see a beast.

bb_1010026.jpg


bb_1010044.jpg


bb_1010094.jpg


I always like the last photo as the curtain comes down. :)

The sunset looked good

mm_1010174.jpg


For our last night at Boardwalk I carried the tripod to get some HDR and long exposures.

bw_1010269_fused.jpg


bw_1010294_fused.jpg


bw_1010299_fused.jpg



2 Panasonic G3s? It was our 7th wedding anniversary trip and DW wanted her own G3 so I got her one just before we left.
 
Outstanding job!:thumbsup2 It certainly dispels a lot of myths about small cameras not being able to do the job. I would be proud of those images.
 
Awesome post. And more proof, it's the photographer and not the camera.
 

Awesome post. And more proof, it's the photographer and not the camera.

Thank you! :)

My thoughts are that the fireworks photos may be partly the camera, there is no way I could get clear 2 second exposures like that with my dSLR. The G3 has no mirror so vibration is almost zero when the shutter button is pressed. I may try 4 seconds next time!
 
Maybe even 2 micro 4/3s
*Long opening, skip down if you just want to see the photos.

We have all seen the requests for a camera that is small, light, inexpensive, and gets great action & low light photos. And we have notified the posters that it doesn't exist or we would not be carrying big heavy dSLRs. But what if recent developments have made such a camera possible, or at least met more of those requests than previously?

To reduce the weight of my kit I went from a Canon 30D to a Rebel Xsi three years ago, from a full size prosumer dSLR to an entry level model. Now to continue the quest for smaller & lighter I tried a micro 4/3, a Panasonic G3. The smaller sensor is going to give up something to APS-C (just as APS-C does to full frame), that is just physics, but is 4/3 large enough?

Some columnists and reviewers think so:
.

I too would like a big sensor smaller camera and those pics look good but is the Panasonic G3 (with lens) "pocket size"? I want a smaller camera and not have to carry in a separate bag, literally pocket size (but not a cell phone!)
 
I too would like a big sensor smaller camera and those pics look good but is the Panasonic G3 (with lens) "pocket size"? I want a smaller camera and not have to carry in a separate bag, literally pocket size (but not a cell phone!)

The G3 is not pocket size unless we have really big pockets. Panasonic's new GX1 shares the same sensor and with the X 14-42 lens it is pocket size! The GX1 does not have a viewfinder which is a requirement for me (I am concerned about the durability of add-on external viewfinders and the cost adds up to more than the G3) and that is why I went for the G3 instead.
 
The 45-175 lens seems like a really impressive lens!! You did a fantastic job with it.
 
Looks wonderful. Nicely done. Did you and your wife have a great time?
 
Just great Bob. Now I have to sell all the Full Size DSLR stuff that I've acquired over the last couple of years - you know - so I can buy a micro 4/3rd system and be able to take pictures like yours!!

:rotfl:

Seriously - Excellent pictures!
 
Excellent pictures! I'm still amazed at how clear and sharp pictures from mirrorless cameras can be. Looks like this would be a very nice back-up camera to a dSLR or a primary camera for folks who don't have a dSLR.

Great job again! :)
 
Looks wonderful. Nicely done. Did you and your wife have a great time?

Thanks Mike, we had a *great* time! The weather was perfect, about 80 each day (after last year's 40's) and the parks were not busy at all. We wore our anniversary buttons and were wished "Happy Anniversary" at least 100 times in a 4 day trip! Not to mention congratulatory champagne at Brown Derby. :)

DW loved her Panasonic G3 and it was so nice having "lens boy" (that's me) carry all the extra lenses for when she needed them! In Princess Bride tradition she would ask "Oh lens boy, I would like my telephoto" and I would answer "as you wish". ;)
 
Your pictures look great. I brought my G3 with the kit lens and a Lumix 45-200 to WDW in Oct and I got great results. I also use a wrist strap with it and my Nikon flashes work on it in non-ttl auto.
 
Thanks! It was partly on your recommendation and the quality of your photos that I bought the G3. I have two Canon flashes, maybe they will work to some extent on the G3?
The 45-175 takes some getting used to with the zoom-by-wire but I like how it doesn't change length (like my Canon 70-200 L). The 7-14 is top quality (and they charge for it), it feels like a Canon L!
 
Beautiful shots from a talented photographer!

I just ordered this camera tonight and I am so excited! Unfortunately, I am getting nothing but the kit lens to start with and I might see how I can use some of my existing lenses w/adapters before investing in any new ones.
 
Great shots Bob! I'd switch myself, but my doctor says it's good for me to get weight-bearing exercise..... :goodvibes

I'm so glad you got better weather this year. We were back the 9th to the 18th and loved the weather we got as well (outside of a couple rainy days).

It's funny you posted that Main Street shot with no flag pole. I was just mulling over when to go back next year but hadn't considered the fact that the garlands would be down over Main Street as well. Still, that gorgeous unobstructed view down Main Street..... Hmmmm...... Anyone know for sure when the flag pole comes down and when the tree goes up?
 
Great shots Bob! I'd switch myself, but my doctor says it's good for me to get weight-bearing exercise..... :goodvibes

I'm so glad you got better weather this year. We were back the 9th to the 18th and loved the weather we got as well (outside of a couple rainy days).

It's funny you posted that Main Street shot with no flag pole. I was just mulling over when to go back next year but hadn't considered the fact that the garlands would be down over Main Street as well. Still, that gorgeous unobstructed view down Main Street..... Hmmmm...... Anyone know for sure when the flag pole comes down and when the tree goes up?

Not only did our camera bags get lighter, my wallet got a lot lighter too! ;) Of course DW wants her own wide angle and telephoto lenses too! Valentine's Day is gonna' hurt! :(

We usually go to WDW the first week of December (wedding anniversary, Seabreeze Point) and the flagpole is usually back on Tuesday along with the tree. My guess is the flagpole is moved by Thursday so that only gives us 4-5 days and the parade taping days are much too crowded (there may also be TV crews taking over the train station deck). Sunday has always been good so that and Tuesday would give us all the various views down Main Street.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter
Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom