Goofyposter
Director of Farmland Defense
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2001
- Messages
- 2,388
Roy Disney and Stanley Gold Call Action By Disney Board A Blatant Rejection of Shareholder Will and Significant Step Backwards for Governance Reform in America
Burbank, CA -- March 4, 2004 --Roy Disney and Stanley Gold today called the move by The Walt Disney Company Board of Directors of naming George Mitchell as Chairman, while allowing Michael Eisner to remain CEO, "a blatant rejection of shareholder will, a betrayal of trust and a significant step backwards for substantive governance reform in America's capital markets.
"The unprecedented 43% No Confidence Vote on Michael Eisner is a sharp rebuke to his continued leadership," Messrs. Disney and Gold said, "More importantly, for the Board to endorse a lame duck CEO that shareholders have repudiated is untenable for the Company, its shareholders, its employees and its business partners. Good corporate governance mandates that Boards listen and be responsive to their shareholders. The Disney Board has minimized the message sent by their shareholders."
"This Board just doesn't get it. Once again, we see half measures, cosmetic changes and poor choices," Messrs. Disney and Gold continued. "Apparently, they think they can just ignore the 24% No Confidence Vote Mr. Mitchell received from the company's shareholders, which clearly demonstrates they do not believe in his leadership."
Mr. Gold added, "Mr. Mitchell has a checkered history as a corporate Director and lacks the business acumen, independence and credibility to serve as Chairman of The Walt Disney Company. His selection as chairman is a terrible choice by this Board. It is a grave disservice to their shareholders."
Messrs. Disney and Gold continued, "It is clear from this action that corporate governance is just talk at the Walt Disney Company. We renew our call for substantive change beginning with the immediate commencement of a search for a new CEO and the selection of a truly independent Chairman of the Board," they said. "The shareholders have spoken and the Board must respond appropriately."
Messrs. Disney and Gold said that the public outcry from investors has been deafening.
Sean Harrigan, President of CalPERS stated, "This discontent is too wide and way too deep in the marketplace, and it has led us to believe that Eisner should go and the Board should get quickly to work on planning for an orderly transition."
New York State Comptroller Alan Hevesi stated, "what Disney must do is 'separate the positions of chairman and chief executive and ... replace Mr. Eisner as soon as possible.'"
Cynthia Richson, the corporate governance officer for the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System stated, "I'm extremely disappointed with Mitchell. There are questions about his psychological independence, considering his long-standing ties with Eisner."
Robert A.G. Monks, Respected governance luminary, commenting on the vote stated ``This is so high. It would have been a discharge vote at 33 percent. At 43 percent, they shouldn't even take time to blot the ink on the resignation....He's got to go. He really does. You can't have this big shadow over the board and over the succession process. Unhappily, Michael was personally repudiated. He'll just have to take that and accept it... Michael and the Board have to soberly reflect that they've been rejected by their owners".
Patrick McGurn of Institutional Shareholder Services was quoted as saying, "...beyond a referendum on corporate governance. This is a referendum on Eisner's continued presence at the company." A spokeswoman for ISS added, "If the Disney Board believes this is the silver bullet to fix all the problems, they are sort of mistaken. The level of the vote makes it clear that investors have a lot more on their minds than just the splitting of the position."
The Council of Institutional Investors stated today, "And the most troubling thing of all? The company's response to this extraordinary shareholder proxy revolt trivialized it."
Charles Elson, director of the University of Delaware's Center for Corporate Governance said, ``Disney once again seems to be misunderstanding the situation. This is a shuffling of the chairs, not a change.''
Mr. Gold continued, "This knee-jerk decision by the Board of Directors is not surprising given its history of lip service and halfhearted measures regarding real corporate governance reform. Disney shareholders and all investors have been let down by the Board of The Walt Disney Company; yet again, they have failed to meet and honor the fundamental principles of good governance."
Mr. Gold and Mr. Disney plan to continue their campaign by speaking to and meeting with the Company's shareholders in the coming days.
"These issues are just too important for Disney and the overall credibility of our capital markets. We can't stop or slow down now," Roy Disney said.
Burbank, CA -- March 4, 2004 --Roy Disney and Stanley Gold today called the move by The Walt Disney Company Board of Directors of naming George Mitchell as Chairman, while allowing Michael Eisner to remain CEO, "a blatant rejection of shareholder will, a betrayal of trust and a significant step backwards for substantive governance reform in America's capital markets.
"The unprecedented 43% No Confidence Vote on Michael Eisner is a sharp rebuke to his continued leadership," Messrs. Disney and Gold said, "More importantly, for the Board to endorse a lame duck CEO that shareholders have repudiated is untenable for the Company, its shareholders, its employees and its business partners. Good corporate governance mandates that Boards listen and be responsive to their shareholders. The Disney Board has minimized the message sent by their shareholders."
"This Board just doesn't get it. Once again, we see half measures, cosmetic changes and poor choices," Messrs. Disney and Gold continued. "Apparently, they think they can just ignore the 24% No Confidence Vote Mr. Mitchell received from the company's shareholders, which clearly demonstrates they do not believe in his leadership."
Mr. Gold added, "Mr. Mitchell has a checkered history as a corporate Director and lacks the business acumen, independence and credibility to serve as Chairman of The Walt Disney Company. His selection as chairman is a terrible choice by this Board. It is a grave disservice to their shareholders."
Messrs. Disney and Gold continued, "It is clear from this action that corporate governance is just talk at the Walt Disney Company. We renew our call for substantive change beginning with the immediate commencement of a search for a new CEO and the selection of a truly independent Chairman of the Board," they said. "The shareholders have spoken and the Board must respond appropriately."
Messrs. Disney and Gold said that the public outcry from investors has been deafening.
Sean Harrigan, President of CalPERS stated, "This discontent is too wide and way too deep in the marketplace, and it has led us to believe that Eisner should go and the Board should get quickly to work on planning for an orderly transition."
New York State Comptroller Alan Hevesi stated, "what Disney must do is 'separate the positions of chairman and chief executive and ... replace Mr. Eisner as soon as possible.'"
Cynthia Richson, the corporate governance officer for the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System stated, "I'm extremely disappointed with Mitchell. There are questions about his psychological independence, considering his long-standing ties with Eisner."
Robert A.G. Monks, Respected governance luminary, commenting on the vote stated ``This is so high. It would have been a discharge vote at 33 percent. At 43 percent, they shouldn't even take time to blot the ink on the resignation....He's got to go. He really does. You can't have this big shadow over the board and over the succession process. Unhappily, Michael was personally repudiated. He'll just have to take that and accept it... Michael and the Board have to soberly reflect that they've been rejected by their owners".
Patrick McGurn of Institutional Shareholder Services was quoted as saying, "...beyond a referendum on corporate governance. This is a referendum on Eisner's continued presence at the company." A spokeswoman for ISS added, "If the Disney Board believes this is the silver bullet to fix all the problems, they are sort of mistaken. The level of the vote makes it clear that investors have a lot more on their minds than just the splitting of the position."
The Council of Institutional Investors stated today, "And the most troubling thing of all? The company's response to this extraordinary shareholder proxy revolt trivialized it."
Charles Elson, director of the University of Delaware's Center for Corporate Governance said, ``Disney once again seems to be misunderstanding the situation. This is a shuffling of the chairs, not a change.''
Mr. Gold continued, "This knee-jerk decision by the Board of Directors is not surprising given its history of lip service and halfhearted measures regarding real corporate governance reform. Disney shareholders and all investors have been let down by the Board of The Walt Disney Company; yet again, they have failed to meet and honor the fundamental principles of good governance."
Mr. Gold and Mr. Disney plan to continue their campaign by speaking to and meeting with the Company's shareholders in the coming days.
"These issues are just too important for Disney and the overall credibility of our capital markets. We can't stop or slow down now," Roy Disney said.
Now ... I've never run a multi-media conglomerate, nor have I ever sat on the board of an organization with a budget over $100K, but I don't see how everyone can get so up in arms about how "nothing has happened yet" when it's only been a week since the meeting. One of the big things everyone yells at ME for is having no succession plan, but yet Roy and Stan want him fired, and now. Yet, no one -- not really even any of the vehemently anti-Eisner camp here -- has offered up any suggestion for who would step into that role, except that there seems to be a consensus that there's no one in upper management of the Company who's ready. Which means a search and at least a couple interviews and some contract negotiations and all the other fun stuff that comes with replacing a senior executive. 
