kimmar067
TAGS?? It's all about the 'likes' now!
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2001
- Messages
- 157,792
I reject the question. No store sells things for 91% off.
....you've never heard of a fire sale?

I reject the question. No store sells things for 91% off.

It was 9% OFF -- 91% of the regular price
I don't know what to tell you in regards to them not having been taught division yetreally?
but the answer is
(26/91)*100 = 28.57
Winner, winner, chicken dinner! OP, you just know too much math and automatically converted the 91% to a decimal! I would have done it your way, also, and spent quite a bit of time thinking about how to do this marlynnp beat me to it!
This way gives the same answer, and doesn't solve the problem which is that my kid can't divide by a two digit number.
Ooops, I was focusing on the 'dividing by a decimal' issue and forgot that they hadn't done double digit division yet. Actually, this is a peculiar issue, I think. I teach in special ed, and even my 5th graders are working on division with double digits. Granted, we use multiplication charts a lot, but we're working on it. Are you sure they aren't doing this and your student just doesn't understand it?
If you talk with the teacher about this problem, keep us in the loop!
He can do long division with a 1 digit divisor. Such as 23,945/4, and long division with decimals in the divisor.
We're in a common core state, and the common core standards for fifth have students exploring long division using place value models, repeated subtraction, arrays and other strategies. The standard algorithm is taught in sixth.
Ummm… explain that to the bank when the check bounces. SO I guess my snarky "Common Core" answer is that it doesn't matter if your student can get the right answer as long as he understands what he needs to do!
:good vibes:When you say long division with decimals in the divisor, I assume you mean single digit decimals? Otherwise, what's the difference between a double digit divisor and a 2-digit decimal divisor?
We are common core, too, but aren't implementing it until Fall 2014. I'm not excited about it, especially as the trainer told me that in math it's the process that counts and not the answer. Yes, I cross-questioned her and she said CC math doesn't care if you get the right answer or not, as long as you understand what should be happening.Ummm explain that to the bank when the check bounces. SO I guess my snarky "Common Core" answer is that it doesn't matter if your student can get the right answer as long as he understands what he needs to do!
![]()
:good vibes:
Seriously good luck with this. Maybe the teacher just forgot that she hasn't taught division with double digit divisors yet? It's easy to make mistakes when making up a worksheet BTDT!
He can do long division with a 1 digit divisor. Such as 23,945/4, and long division with decimals in the divisor.
We're in a common core state, and the common core standards for fifth have students exploring long division using place value models, repeated subtraction, arrays and other strategies. The standard algorithm is taught in sixth.

Learning to divide by decimals in long hand is dumb. Calculators exist for a reason.
FWIW - This is from the 5th grade Common Core standards:
Find whole-number quotients of whole numbers with up to four-digit dividends and two-digit divisors, using strategies based on place value, the properties of operations, and/or the relationship between multiplication and division. Illustrate and explain the calculation by using equations, rectangular arrays, and/or area models.
IMO, this seems to say that they should have been taught division by two-digit divisors in 5th grade. We are a state that has adopted the Common Core and I know my 5th grade daughter has covered it this year. The 4th grade Common Core has only a one-digit divisor in it.
In any case, good luck with the tutoring.![]()
CCSS.Math.Content.6.NS.B.2 Fluently divide multi-digit numbers using the standard algorithm.
You lost me at 26 = .91P
Seriously, I'm going to be the most useless parent when it comes to math. English, science, history... Got that covered. BUT MATH?! No bueno.