I would disagree that the price is too low since that is where transactions have been occurring over the year. The average contract of full 2016 and no banked has been ~115 this year. Disney is up to something as they have taken a lot of BLT recently.
Right, but in less than 2 months he passes the UY turnover. Then it becomes full current year plus a year of banked.
If you did full 2016 and no banked earlier in the year, that's reasonable. Like for a Feb UY closing in Feb of 2016, that would be fine. You get the current points, but you're not getting more for 12 months. In the current case it's more valuable because you're getting a double allotment so soon with that UY just around the corner. So you can't compare contracts that close at different times as equals. In some cases, they can differ by an entire set of points.
e.g.: "
2016 full points and nothing banked" means different values based on when you're buying:
On a Sep UY being bought in Feb of 2016... means you've got absolutely nothing for 7 months, and then nothing further until 19 months.
On a Feb UY being bought in Feb of 2016... would mean you've got 160 points, and then not again for a year.
On a Feb UY being bought in Dec of 2016... would mean you've got 160 points, and 160 more in less than the time it will take to close.
Even tho all of those can be described as "
2016 full and nothing banked" the timing means you've got either nothing, one set of points, or 2 sets of points. It's 160 more points than what you're describing as a typical ~$115 value.
I don't think Disney is up to something. I think they have targets they'll buy, and this with so many points coming so quickly is under that threshhold. They snatched up 2 equally low offers. I think what is needed is an offer more in line with $115 plus the value of the banked points to pass ROFR. Alternatively, if this contract had 160 coming instead of 320, then I think D would have waived it.