Not at all. Children from two-parent families outperform those from single parent families, unless the household income is equivilant (meaning the single parent would have to earn as much as a two-parent household - not likely).
This is a not bash on single parents. It's just true. Especially in inner city areas.
I am a honors student living in a single family home with a mom who works part time while going back to school. Not only do I not have both parents living at home but we also do not have a high income. Not only is my dad not around now, but he has never been so I just do not see your point.
OK - if he has stopped progressing - what is the point of school? And how could any school continue to promote him to 7th grade when he is so behind?
At this point taxpayers are paying for babysitting - by your own admission there is no further progression to be had.
So yeah - I would kick him out of school.
I hope you never have power over who can and cannot go to school. If someone is forced to stay in one grade for years how do you know when they should graduate or do we just keep them in school forever spending even more money than before.
I don't think the money for free lunch comes from the school budget. Actually, I think it links the school to more Title 1 money. But I agree with you that money isn't as simple an issue as it seems. My youngest goes to a Catholic school with a large class size (30 kids per class). They can get away with having that work because there is no special ed and there is an overabundance of parent volunteers (seriously, we had an overnight fieldtrip once, and there were 27 chaperones for 30 kids. Plus the teacher and the aide.) Normally, in a class with more diverse kids, I would think 1:15 or 1:20 would be better.
In my school you have to fill out a form and the government decides if you deserve free lunch and they are also the ones who pay for it.
There are no self contained classes and yes all students are given the same material. The only difference would be an inclusion class would have an extra teacher and/or an aid. During reading, or free time, the spec. ed students would recieve their extra help. Now I think that is great for them, I am not saying they don't deserve an eductaion equal to the other kids but I don't think its fair for all the students. There are some that are well above what is taught in class yet they have no option except to be there, and remain unchallenged.
This is at my child's school, there are only a few in our district with self contained classes and sometimes special ed students are transferred to one of them, but these are for extreme cases.
FTR I do not believe special ed funding should be cut, I just think that there should be more going towards advanced ed, KWIM.
I must be one of the luckier people because my school has seperate classes for those who either need to be taught at a slower pace or higher one or whatever they may need. AP classes tend to have college level books where average and special needs classes have different materials to fit there needs.
I can only speak for myself, but yes we do at our house. My dh and I have always felt that our children's education is OUR responsibility and not solely the school's.
Unfortunately though I know many parents who don't feel this way.
This is sad but true with some parents. Lucky for me my mom supports me the best she can and apparently I am beating all odds since I am an honors student.
I will begin by saying again that I believe special ed children deserve an appropriate education.
But can you just imagine..... if each average, above average, gifted and profoundly gifted child had a full time one on one aide....... what THOSE children could accomplish??
I'm a "gifted" student and I really don't want someone with me constantly like that.
You know exactly what i was talking about.
99.9% of single parent kids do not fall in your category.
Its not just about schools either, Kids with both parents do better in general.
Man am I just screwed for life.
If "Kids NEED both" then, by definition, any child without both parents would either be a failure or cease to exist. You could agree that children do better with two parents, but you cannot make the claim that "Kids NEED both".
I don't get it either.
Are you denying that kids DONT need two parents?
Do you REALLY believe that?
Think about it, do you REALLY believe that?
I stated that kids with 2 parent homes have a much BETTER chance at success.
They get a better shot at a good life.
You are throwing rocks at me with no merit nor aim.
There isnt one post here that i gave that stated kids with one parent CANT succeed.
But if you think its BETTER that kids only have one parent, then you either
1. Dont have kids
2. Dont WANT to see the truth.
So the kid who has a lush for a dad and maybe an abusive mom is automatically given a higher chance at success then the child who has one full time parent who supports them and provides what the child needs?
I agree with this. Where I live they have a special school for special needs children. It would be nice if they were able to do that in other areas.
My school district has a building for people with very low IQ's and it is nice because they can be given the attention they need and have a staff that is trained for any behavior issues or anyother thing that may come up.
You know, actually most little boys DO play with trucks and toy tractors while girls actually DO play with dolls and play houses and stuff.
You know, we actually HAVE boys and girl clothes, is that a sterotype also?Gender sterotyping?
LOL
Its called reality.
Yes actually it is.
I was thinking the same thing. I remember this guy in high school who would constantly make fun of the special needs kids. I remember in English one day, this girl made a really dumb statement and he said, "such and such, you are so retarded, why don't you get a wheel chair and go join the rest of the drooling retards."
It was non stop with him. He picked on somebody everyday. Well, he is now married and has a wheel chair bound child (I think with spinal bifida).
I was made fun of the other day because I have a slight stuttering issue.
So in conclusion I am a bit confused. I come from a single parent, low income family and my ADHD puts me in the special needs categorie yet I am an honors student and took some college classes at the age of 16. So do I go to a private school to get away from all those "normal" people and where I can stop costing the government money, or should I be sent to a vocational setting because of my ADHD?