Without sending this discussion into a completely different direction, don't you think that very strict credit policies will hinder employment for the people who need it the most? Everyone thinks that people should support themselves and most believe that welfare is meant to be a short-term safety net.
So, then take the lowest paying jobs and make it impossible for anyone who has had past problems to get them. More highly qualified people with good credit aren't the ones after the $6.50 an hour job, so who then works them?
That's a little bit ridiculous in my opinion that you check a credit score to determine someone is a qualified canidate. In some cases even a criminal background shouldn't matter. Ah well... corporate American bullpoop.
Without sending this discussion into a completely different direction, don't you think that very strict credit policies will hinder employment for the people who need it the most? Everyone thinks that people should support themselves and most believe that welfare is meant to be a short-term safety net.
So, then take the lowest paying jobs and make it impossible for anyone who has had past problems to get them. More highly qualified people with good credit aren't the ones after the $6.50 an hour job, so who then works them?
True, but should employers be the ones to take the risk that those people will perpetuate their irresponsible behavior?
True, but should employers be the ones to take the risk that those people will perpetuate their irresponsible behavior?
I think that's the gist of the freecreditreport.com commercial about the guy working at the fish restaurant. It is becomming a lot more common - and when you have two equally qualified applicants would you rather hire the one who used poor financial judgment or the one who did not?
Now marketing credit cards to college students, that is another thread!
This makes the most sense- I completely understand why a reservation clerk should have a credit check.
Do we know for sure that they base the selection process on credit scores for ALL positions? Or is the OP assuming this?