Grand Californian at Disneyland no longer an option...

Discussion in 'DVC-Mousecellaneous' started by artsvdo, Mar 17, 2010.

  1. artsvdo

    artsvdo Earning My Ears

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    We have been DVC members since 2005 and live in California. We purchased membership solely for making reservations at the resorts at Disneyland. We have enjoyed using our points once for a villa at Saratoga Springs (our Home resort) in Florida in 2007.

    Up to the beginning of this year, we really enjoyed our DVC membership.

    Our membership simply worked for us and was great!

    In February of this year, we tried to make a reservation at the Villas at Grand Californian for June 2010, which of course was booked (there is only 50 units available). We then tried to make a reservation at the Grand California, which we learned at the time, was no longer an option.

    Of course we realize that we failed to read the fine print on last years point charts.

    And worse, we can't even book a room at the Disneyland Hotel with Concierge anymore. Just Premium and Standard view rooms.

    So like any good DVC member would do, we complained to our guide.

    Our guide acted like he knew nothing of the changes. He asked us to email him our concerns so he could show them to his leaders. Our guide also referred us to a Quality Assurance Representative.

    When the QAR called us back the next day, he mainly listened to our complaints.

    Our main question to our reps was this:

    How is our membership better today than it was when we purchased it in 2005?

    So far they haven't answered this.

    And we now know, thanks to this GREAT forum, that its going to get worse for us. We may or will be facing a $95 charge to stay at Disneyland Hotel and Paradise Pier.

    So my questions to the Forum membership are this:

    1. Even though our DVC Guide and the QAR acted like they knew nothing of these pending changes, did they?

    2. Is selling our membership an option? We have a 300 points at SS and owe less than 25% on the loan we took out.

    Well, thanks for listening!
     
  2. Avatar

    Google AdSense Guest Advertisement


    to hide this advert.
  3. bwvBound

    bwvBound DVC SSR & other timeshare

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,770
    Howdy neighbor! We are just a tad south of your location and also own at SSR. We've used our DVC points for stays in both GC hotel and GC villas.

    My hunch is that the guides and related staff knew that the GC hotel rooms, effective this year, were no longer offered via DVC points. Yes, you have the option of selling your points.

    Other options:
    • Try the waitlist for the GC Villas?
    • Consider the DL and Paradise Pier hotel rooms?
    • Consider adding DVC GC points to take advantage of home-resort window? (We haven't done it ... as we know we'd never book more than 7 months out ... but perhaps you might?)
    • Consider hotels or other timeshares located near DLR?
    I hope things look brighter for you soon!
     
  4. artsvdo

    artsvdo Earning My Ears

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Hello neighbor bwvBound!

    Thank you for the reply!

    After the whirlwind died down a bit, we made a reservation at the Disneyland Hotel for our vacation this June.

    From what I understand, in the future, there may be a $95 charge for reservations there and Paradise Pier.

    As for buying ownership points at Villas at Grand Californian, we did look into that originally but it just wasn't financially feasible for us.

    The waiting list doesn't work for us because we do plan way ahead for these trips.

    Why did they construct so few villas there. Did they think it wasn't going to sell?

    Thank you!
     
  5. bumbershoot

    bumbershoot DIS Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    52,169
    "Why did they construct so few villas there."

    Where is the earth available for them to build more? Anaheim is packed already!


    Is your guide in Florida or Anaheim? The Anaheim guides, I'm sure, knew about it. The Florida guides perhaps not.

    Sorry you didn't know about this ahead of time...we stayed at the hotel side in October, but it was shortly after that that points bookings at GChotel weren't allowed any longer.

    The concierge thing was just taken off a couple/few months ago. Was a bummer, as that's how we used our "bonus" points last May at the DLH.


    And I've learned from the boards that as soon as a hotel gets a DVC property, you can't book the hotel anymore on points. It's a common thing...so if the Poly gets a DVC, then you can't book at the Poly anymore with points.


    I could be wrong, I often am, but I'm not *worried* about the booking fee for the other hotels at this time...would seem a bit "shoot ourselves in the foot" of them, given how relatively small the GC villa area is.
     
  6. bwvBound

    bwvBound DVC SSR & other timeshare

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,770
    Good call! :banana:

    I hear you on the other comments (potential $95 fee, too few units, loss of concierge). Using my mom's advice, "Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first." ;) We enjoy what we can while we can.
     
  7. Pakey

    Pakey DIS Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    20,110
    I would guess that the guides did know about it but if you didn't specifically ask the question "are DVC rooms being built at DLR at such and such a time", they probably would not volunteer that information. I remember asking if we could use our points to book hotels at WDW and we were told sure, it's easy, yada yada but they certainly didn't disclose the points to dollars ratio.

    Yes, you can sell your membership, if you can find a buyer. The sponsor on this board, the Timeshare Store, does resales. We used them to buy our 3rd contract and the personnel were very nice to deal with. I'm probably going to sell 2 of our contracts in the years ahead and I would use them.
     
  8. wbl2745

    wbl2745 Pointless infinite loops are prohibited.

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Messages:
    584
    If you look at the layout of the addition to the GC where the VGC are located you'll note that there are three "wings" only one of which are DVC villas. They could have tripled the number of villas by making all of the addition DVC. Ultimately this was a financial decision. Clearly at some point they decided they could make more money with hotel rooms than DVC units. (In which case why did they do it at all?) I've wondered to myself whether there might not be a plan somewhere that says that if DVC is a grand idea at the Grand Californian if they might not convert the hotel rooms in the wing to DVC units at some point in time?

    I've also heard rumblings about a DVC property in a fourth tower at the Disneyland Hotel. They also own property to the east of the resort proper. Perhaps something could go in there. Also, with the Anaheim Garden Walk in bankruptcy, one always wonders why the auction was called off at the last minute? Was there some behind the scenes dealing going on?
     
  9. artsvdo

    artsvdo Earning My Ears

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    I can't argue with land being a premium in Anaheim!

    I think if they could only build a "limited" amount of villas at GC, then they shouldn't have closed off GC completely, YET. I can understand their policy of closing off the main hotels, etc.

    "And I've learned from the boards that as soon as a hotel gets a DVC property, you can't book the hotel anymore on points. It's a common thing...so if the Poly gets a DVC, then you can't book at the Poly anymore with points."

    50 villas at VGC as compared to over 700 rooms at GC? Im only guessing but I'm sure when they did this, the villa section would have a comparable amount of rooms available.
     
  10. tjkraz

    tjkraz <img src="http://www.wdwinfo.com/images/silver.jpg

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    13,441
    That's a very subjective question so I wouldn't expect Disney to answer it for you. Each of us will answer that in our own way.

    Personally I've never booked outside of the DVC resorts so the $95 fee is of no impact. I own points at the Grand Californian so I'll be booking my stays there 11 months out.

    I can think of a number of perks introduced since 2005 which are beneficial to members, also upgrades to guest rooms, new destinations available, etc.

    If you feel the program is worse, you are certainly entitled to that opinion. But there will never be any universal agreement on the matter.

    Well, you could use the "may" qualifier with regard to just about any aspect of DVC. The common line of thought was that DVC didn't impose the $95 fee for Disneyland resorts because there was no DVC out there. But now there is a DVC (Grand Cal) and the fee is still not present. All we can do is speculate as to whether it will ever be added.

    Yes, they should have. And you probably should have realized it was a possibility, too. Going back almost 10 years to the opening of VWL, DVC has always eliminated the ability to book cash rooms at a resort after a DVC component was constructed. Wilderness Lodge...Beach Club...Animal Kingdom Lodge...Contemporary...Grand Californian...all have had their cash rooms removed from the list once the corresponding DVC villas opened.

    Well, all business decisions (and most personal decisions) have a financial component. ;)

    Hotel rooms are far more profitable so I agree with your reasoning. They knew demand existed for another 200 cash rooms so the hotel received the bulk of the expansion.

    The Disneyland guest demographic is much different than Walt Disney World. In many ways you could label the 50 DVC villas as a test program. Nobody really knew how DVC would be received out west. In fact, some critics have already labeled the Grand Cal a failure because they are still working to sell those 50 villas more than a year after sales began. (By comparison, Disney has sold about 150 villas in the Bay Lake Tower over an 18-month span. And those sales were concurrent with two other properties at Walt Disney World.)

    Yes, the possibility does exist. There are other options for building on the fringes like the 4th DL hotel tower.

    But I wouldn't expect any dramatic growth out west. Going into 2007 Walt Disney World already had over 2000 DVC units and they were constructing another 700+ spread over 3 sites (Bay Lake Tower, Kidani and Treehouses.) Disneyland doesn't have nearly that much demand so growth will occur at a slower pace.
     
  11. toocherie

    toocherie <img src=http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis-sponsor/images DIS Lifetime Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    6,332
    I always understood that the GCV villas were going to be at a premium--that is why I bought as soon as they came out. There is no guarantee that there will be availability at any resort--so I don't think the number of villas needs to come close to the number of hotel rooms for the hotel to cut off availability--and keep in mind there are the DLH and PPH available too. It's not like there aren't options. (It is a bummer about concierge--but I suspect those get booked faster than regular rooms and they don't feel the need to turn rooms over to DVC to fill them.)

    As for availability of the GCV--I think that if you are planning a three day or more trip (especially if a weekend is involved) you are going to need the 11 month booking window. Having said that--I'm local and not likely to plan any long-term trips, and have had little difficulty booking one or two nights when I want--in fact I just called last week and booked a studio for the second to the last weekend (Sat-Sun) in May. So there is availability, but once you get within that 7-month window you are going to need to be flexible.

    I think the guides and DVC expected GCV to sell-out immediately--and that would prompt another DVC development at DLR. However, with the sinking economy that didn't happen so think it will be a while before we see a second West-coast DVC.
     
  12. toocherie

    toocherie <img src=http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis-sponsor/images DIS Lifetime Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    6,332
    oh and about converting GCH rooms to GCV--someone recently posted a great map--and IIRC the hotel rooms were smaller than the studios--so it might not be so easy to do a conversion.
     
  13. artsvdo

    artsvdo Earning My Ears

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Thank you everyone for all of your answers to my questions! I really appreciate it!

    I realize now that my wife and I were never fully involved with all of the DVC rules and processes.

    In 2005, the "part" of our DVC membership that we used worked very well for us. No need to look into it further if it working for us.

    Now in 2010, those same "parts" now no longer work or have been greatly modified. Since its not working, now we are looking into it further. This is clearly our fault.

    But it's not the end of the world.

    Thanks again to everyone for all of you information!
     
  14. BigTigger

    BigTigger DIS Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2002
    Messages:
    772
    Don't beat yourself up too much as it's easy to miss the details as DVC has so many options beyond the DVC resorts and the changes in options is constant from year to year.

    It has been Disney/DVC policy to drop hotel rentals as an option when the DVC addition to the hotel opens. WL fell off when VWL opened, BC fell off when BCV opened (although you can do YC and the especially fun YC Concierge still), and AKL fell off when AKV opened. DVC also instituted the fee for using the hotels, but exempted DL hotels. I'd guess the DL hotels will get the fee now too.

    I can't find the link on DL hotel points to reference, but I believe concierge isn't an option as the DL hotel is undergoing a three year renovation and concierge in the main building is part of this year's renovation.
     
  15. ACDSNY

    ACDSNY I love my job! I love my job! I love my job!

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    10,966
    artsvdo - Are all your points at SSR in one contract?

    We've actually sold our small SSR contracts in order to purchase additional points at VGC as I was worried we would have trouble booking at the 7 month window. Yes, money wise it wasn't the wisest choice, but we're happy to have most of our points in the VGC as we vacation there way more often then WDW.

    I would also waitlist as it might come through has more units sell and are declared into inventory.
     
  16. tjkraz

    tjkraz <img src="http://www.wdwinfo.com/images/silver.jpg

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    13,441
    'course that only works if you're trying to book June 2010 far earlier than February 2010. I suspect OP is going to have to make changes to booking habits in order for VGC ownership to be of any real benefit.
     
  17. ACDSNY

    ACDSNY I love my job! I love my job! I love my job!

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    10,966
    So true! We had to change our booking habits for DL, now I put in early what I think we may want and I'll worry about changing later if I have to.
     
  18. artsvdo

    artsvdo Earning My Ears

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    We have:

    230 points at SSR that were purchased in 2005 that are paid for.

    in 2006, we purchased 70 additional points at SSR that we are still paying on.

    With some of the promotions that they keep giving and the fact we don't expect to go to Florida any time soon, it may be worth a "cut" in value to sell and purchase GCV.

    Wow, never thought of that.

    Thanks for the idea!
     
  19. lark

    lark DIS Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,794
    I think the OP's point is just further confirmation of the number 1 point to consider when buying DVC: Buy where you want to stay, or at a minimum, would not mind staying if you can't get on a wait list.

    Buying SSR hoping to stay at disneyland is not that different from buying Vero Beach hoping to stay at BLT. It might work sometimes. It might not others. At a minimum, you have to try at 7 months.

    It really is a very significant point that should be imparted to prospective purchasers doing their due diligence: Home resort matters. That and understanding dues are at or near the top of the list.

    With respect to VGC, though, there's not really enough data yet. An awful lot of people report being able to get in well inside the 7 months. I booked inside 2 months. And as they sell more of the resort, presumably more inventory will be declared. So it may be premature to assume it's going to be impossible to get VGC at 7 months.
     
  20. nunzia

    nunzia You can't top pigs with pigs, but you CAN top Toys

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,528
    I'm sorry this came at you in such an unpleasant way...Yes, 50 units seems very tiny, but they haven't sold out, so I guess they knew better than me, who was sure they would sell out immediately. There is a rumor floating around that if these units do well they would build more..maybe at PP somehow..That said, this is the same as any other DVC with a hotel attached..can't use points there any longer. And yes, they could start charging the $95 fee to stay at DLH and PP. I don't understand why they took the Conceirge option off the table though..I find that odd.
    If you tend to stay at the Grand more often than going to WDW would it be a possibility to sell your SSR poins and buy into VGC?
     
  21. nunzia

    nunzia You can't top pigs with pigs, but you CAN top Toys

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,528
    The auction was called off?? INtersting...
     

Share This Page