Just curious. How has it almost shut you down?Originally posted by roymccoy
This flight restriction over DL and WDW is totally useless, unless you're Disney trying to keep out competition. As I have said before, my wife is a pilot and we own a small plane and the DL flight restriction has almost shut us down.
So let's suppose that you are right, and Disney stops doing the security checks. Now someone walks through the gates with a gun and opens fire at a crowd on Main St. Where was that gun hidden? In a diaper bag. I'm all for giving up some of my personal privacy so I feel a little bit safer while on vacation. Heck, why don't we just stop security checks all together everywhere?Originally posted by roymccoy
Oh, there's no doubt about it. This was all done for Disney in the guise of "security". It's the same reason that they still check your bags (even though nothing has ever been found, weapon wise, I'm told by a friend at TDA at DL.) They're looking for food and other contraband that isn't allowed into the parks for monetary reasons, not security reasons. They'd pat you down if they could get away with it, to check for contraband. Disney wants you to pay $2.50 for a 20 oz. Coke, not bring it in with you. They check our 1 year olds diaper and food bag like we've hidden the antedote in it, looking for contraband food and drinks.
So what about the other no-fly zones around the country? Do you have a problem with those also?Originally posted by roymccoy
Consider this while you're having some peace of mind at the parks, my wife and I are up there in our plane navigating between the Disney TFR and the mountains to the east of DL and we are putting our lives at unnecessary risk just to give you the warm and fuzzies while you're at Disneyland. Disney is in some of the busiest airspace in the world and it puts a substantial amount of sequencing of the airplanes around to not bust the TFR at DL. This causes airplanes to be funneled to one or the other side of the TFR and this makes for more of a chance of a mid-air collission or distractions for the pilot.
Without trying to sound rude. So because you and your wife are a little inconvenienced in your "jaunts" to San Diego that the possible safety of 10,000 others should be comprimised?Originally posted by roymccoy
hauntedmansionfan, we fly out of Fullerton Airport which is under the Class B airspace from Los Angeles Airport and right next to the new Disney TFR. We can now only leave Fullerton when the tower is open if we are departing to the south. (Towards Disney) The tower is open until 9pm and we usually leave at 10pm. If we are leaving after 9pm to the south, we have to fly all the way around the TFR or over the top at 3001 feet AGL. Many times, we are just hopping over to San Diego along the coast and the time that this adds on (not to mention safety concerns) makes those trips not worth it anymore.
So with the banner towing companies out of the way... wouldn't that mean less air traffic and less that you have to worry about?Originally posted by roymccoy
It's not an inconvenience, it can be a matter of safety. We have enough to worry about up there then to have Disney trying to keep the banner towing companies away in the guise of security.
I never said anything about my own "false" sense of security. But if it will came the fears of 10,000 people visiting a certain location then the fears of a family of 4. Then unfortunately... majority rules.Originally posted by roymccoy
Not to sound rude, but is your false sense of security at the parks worth it to put my wife and family at a little more risk?